| Author |
Message |
|
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:41 pm Subject: AZ laws on payday loans - revised
Latest Blog Post : http://treefrog.yesdebtfree.org |
|
|
I ran across this info and I would like if someone can put it in more layman terms. I think I understand it but would like another opinion.
I think it could be very helpful to Arizonians.
| Quote: | REFERENCE TITLE: regulations; payday loans
State of Arizona
House of Representatives
Forty-eighth Legislature
First Regular Session
2007
HB 2539
Introduced by
Representatives Ableser, Cajero Bedford, Hershberger, Kirkpatrick, Lopez, Lujan, Prezelski, Saradnik, Sinema, Senators McCune Davis, O'Halleran: Representatives Alvarez, Anderson, Bradley, Burns J, Clark, Farley, Gallardo, Lopes, McClure, Meza, Pancrazi, Schapira, Tobin, Tom, Senators Burton Cahill, Rios, Soltero
AN ACT
Amending section 6-1203, Arizona Revised Statutes; Repealing title 6, chapter 12.1, Arizona Revised Statutes; amending title 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding a new chapter 12.1; relating to payday loans.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE)
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
Section 1. Section 6-1203, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
START_STATUTE6-1203. Exemptions
A. This chapter does not apply to:
1. The United States or any department or agency of the United States.
2. This state, including any political subdivision of this state.
B. This chapter does not apply to the following if engaged in the regular course of their respective businesses, except that the provisions of article 2 of this chapter apply applies to:
1. A bank, financial institution holding company, credit union, savings and loan association or savings bank, whether organized under the laws of any state or the United States when the term "money transmitter" is used.
2. A person who engages in check cashing or foreign money exchange and engages in other activity regulated under this chapter only as an authorized delegate of a licensee acting within the scope of the contract between the authorized delegate and the licensee.
3. A person licensed pursuant to chapter 5, 6, 7 or 8 of this title, chapter 9, article 2 of this title, chapter 12.1 of this title or title 32, chapter 9.END_STATUTE
Sec. 2. Repeal
Title 6, chapter 12.1, Arizona Revised Statutes, is repealed.
Sec. 3. Title 6, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by adding a new chapter 12.1, to read:
CHAPTER 12.1
PAYDAY LOANS
ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
START_STATUTE6-1251. Definitions
In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
1. "Payday lender" means a person that advances monies in payday lending transactions.
2. "Payday lending" means all transactions in which monies are advanced to be repaid at a later date. END_STATUTE
START_STATUTE6-1252. Small loans prohibited; exemptions
A. A person shall not engage in any business in whatever form transacted, including by mail or the internet or electronic or telephonic means, that consists in whole or in part of making, offering, arranging or acting as an agent in the making of loans of three thousand dollars or less. This section does not apply to any of the following:
1. A person who is engaging in financial transactions otherwise permitted pursuant to this title.
2. Lawful loans pursuant to title 44, chapter 2.1.
3. Except as provided in subsection B, paragraph 4, a bank or thrift chartered under the laws of the United States, a bank chartered under the laws of another state and insured by the federal deposit insurance corporation or a credit card bank that is not operating in violation of the federal and state laws applicable to its charter.
B. This section applies to all payday lending even if the transaction also involves any of the following:
1. The cashing or deferred presentment of a check or other instrument.
2. The selling or providing of an item, service or commodity incidental to the advance of monies.
3. Any element introduced in order to disguise the true nature of the transaction as an extension of credit.
4. Any arrangement by which a de facto lender purports to act as the agent for an exempt entity. For the purposes of this paragraph, A purported agent shall be considered a de facto lender if the entire circumstances of the transaction show that the purported agent holds, acquires or maintains a predominant economic interest in the revenues generated by the loan.
C. A payday lender shall not include in any loan contract made with a resident of this state any provision by which the laws of a state other than this state govern the terms and enforcement of the contract. The loan contract shall not designate a court for the resolution of disputes concerning the contract other than a court of competent jurisdiction in and for the county in which the borrower resides or the loan office is located.
D. An arbitration clause in a payday loan contract is not enforceable if the contract is unconscionable. In determining whether the contract is unconscionable, the court shall consider the circumstances of the transaction as a whole, including:
1. The relative bargaining power of the parties.
2. Whether arbitration would be prohibitively expensive to the borrower in view of the amounts in controversy.
3. Whether the contract restricts or excludes damages or remedies that would be available to the borrower in court, including the right to participate in a class action.
4. Whether the arbitration would take place outside of the county in which the loan office is located or any other place that would be unduly inconvenient or expensive in view of the amounts in controversy.
5. Any other circumstance that might render the contract oppressive.
E. Any person who violates subsection A or B is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor. Each loan transaction is a separate violation of this section. Any person who aids or abets a violation, including any arbiter or arbitration company, is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor. If a person has been convicted of violating subsection A or B on three prior occasions, all subsequent violations are class 6 felonies. END_STATUTE
START_STATUTE6-1253. Violation; civil action; costs and attorney fees
Any person who violates section 6-1252, subsection A or B shall not collect any indebtedness created by the loan transaction and the loan transaction is void. Any person violating section 6-1252, subsection a or b is liable to the borrower in each unlawful transaction for three times the amount of any interest or other charges to the borrower. A civil action for a violation of Section 6-1252 may be brought on behalf of an individual borrower or on behalf of an ascertainable class of borrowers. In a successful action to enforce this chapter, a court shall award a borrower or class of borrowers costs, including reasonable attorney fees. END_STATUTE
START_STATUTE6-1254. Violation; civil penalty; civil action
A. Any person who violates section 6-1252, subsection a or B is liable to this state for a civil penalty equal to three times the amount of any interest or charges to the borrowers in the unlawful transaction.
B. A civil action for a violation of Section 6-1252 may be brought by the Attorney General, a county attorney in the county in which the borrower resides or the loan office is located or a private party. If a successful civil action is brought by a county attorney, one-half of the damages recovered on behalf of this state shall be distributed to the office of the county attorney in order to fund the budget of that office. END_STATUTE
START_STATUTE6-1255. Violation; certificate of authority prohibited
All corporations, limited liability companies or other business entities that are engaged in payday lending in this state shall not obtain any certificate of authority from the Arizona corporation commission. Engaging in payday lending activity in this state shall result in the revocation of any existing certificate of authority. END_STATUTE
START_STATUTE6-1256. Public nuisance
The site or location of a place of business where payday lending takes place in this state is declared a public nuisance. END_STATUTE
START_STATUTE6-1257. Loans to members of the military
A. In addition to the other obligations and duties required under this chapter, if the customer is a member of the military services of the United States or a spouse of a member of the military services of the United States, the following apply:
1. The payday lender shall not do any of the following:
(a) Garnish any military wages or salaries.
(b) Conduct any collection activity against a military member or the spouse of a military member if the military member has been deployed to a combat or combat support posting for the duration of the deployment.
(c) Contact the commanding officer of a military member in an effort to collect on a loan to the military member or the member's spouse.
2. The payday lender agrees to both of the following:
(a) To be bound by the terms of any repayment agreement that it negotiates through military counselors or third-party credit counselors.
(b) To honor any statement or proclamation by a military base commander that a specific payday lender branch location has been declared off‑limits to military personnel and their spouses.
B. If the customer is a member of the military services of the United States or a spouse of a member of the military services of the United States, the following disclosures shall be made in writing by the payday lender:
1. A notice that the payday lender is prohibited from garnishment of any military wages or salaries.
2. A notice that the payday lender is prohibited from conducting any collection activity against a military member or the member's spouse if the military member has been deployed to a combat or combat support posting for the duration of the deployment.
3. A notice that the payday lender is prohibited from contacting the commanding officer of a military member in an effort to collect on a loan to the military member or the member's spouse.
4. A notice that the payday lender agrees to be bound by the terms of any repayment agreement that it negotiates through military counselors or third-party credit counselors.
5. A notice that the payday lender agrees to honor any statement or proclamation by a military base commander that a specific payday lending branch location has been declared off-limits to military personnel and their spouses. END_STATUTE |
|
|
alittletreefrog
Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Debtcc Points: 665
|
|
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:50 pm Subject:
|
|
|
Looks to me like they are specifically saying that internet and phone based companies must comply with AZ laws!
It also says any binding arbitration clause is not valid if the contract isn't fair.
They say that the ipdl CANNOT state in their contract that you agree to follow the laws of another state.
This is great stuff!!!!
The rest of it looks like it only applies to military people . . . ..
|
|
goudah2424
Moderator
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 8007
Debtcc Points: 111513
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:52 pm Subject:
|
|
|
I especially like:
| Quote: | | E. Any person who violates subsection A or B is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor. Each loan transaction is a separate violation of this section. Any person who aids or abets a violation, including any arbiter or arbitration company, is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor. If a person has been convicted of violating subsection A or B on three prior occasions, all subsequent violations are class 6 felonies. |
It looks to me like AZ has really enacted some great laws to stop these ipdl's! This is awesome news!
|
|
goudah2424
Moderator
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 8007
Debtcc Points: 111513
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:53 pm Subject:
Latest Blog Post : http://Lukesykwalker.yesdebtfree.org |
|
|
why cant someone like this look into the check n go store fronts in Il. they are wrong and help to ruin peoples lives too.
|
|
Lukeskywalker
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 1836
Debtcc Points: 15902
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:55 pm Subject:
|
|
|
What do you mean Luke? If check n go is operating within the laws then the laws would have to be changed . . . . Send a copy of this bill to your state reps, with a letter explaining your situation and how laws like this would help to protect many consumers.
|
|
goudah2424
Moderator
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 8007
Debtcc Points: 111513
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:56 pm Subject:
Latest Blog Post : http://treefrog.yesdebtfree.org |
|
|
What do you make of:
START_STATUTE6-1256. Public nuisance
The site or location of a place of business where payday lending takes place in this state is declared a public nuisance. END_STATUTE
Is this talking about storefronts?
|
|
alittletreefrog
Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Debtcc Points: 665
|
|
|
|
|
Lukeskywalker
Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 1836
Debtcc Points: 15902
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:56 pm Subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Any person who violates section 6-1252, subsection A or B shall not collect any indebtedness created by the loan transaction and the loan transaction is void. |
yay! 
|
|
goudah2424
Moderator
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 8007
Debtcc Points: 111513
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:58 pm Subject:
|
|
|
I would take the public nuisance clause to mean that they are banning any payday lenders from the state? Maybe? I'm not sure about that one . . . . We'd have to look into what AZ laws says regarding public nuisances.
|
|
goudah2424
Moderator
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 8007
Debtcc Points: 111513
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 2:58 pm Subject:
|
|
|
I just want to make sure - Has this bill been passed? Or is it just in the works?
|
|
goudah2424
Moderator
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 8007
Debtcc Points: 111513
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 3:23 pm Subject:
Latest Blog Post : http://treefrog.yesdebtfree.org |
|
|
I check the site and it looks like it is on the upcoming calendar. But the current law has some good stuff in it already. Check this out...this part is a passed law:
| Quote: | 6-1262. Violation; classification; individual liability
A. A person that provides deferred presentment services without a license is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor.
B. A licensee that violates this chapter or the rules adopted pursuant to this chapter is subject to revocation of the licensee's license and is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor.
C. An officer or agent of a corporation or association who participates in a violation of this chapter is subject to the penalties prescribed in this section.
D. Except as the result of an accidental or bona fide error, if the licensee charges, contracts for or receives any amount in excess of the fees expressly permitted by this chapter, the deferred presentment is voidable and the licensee has no right to collect or receive any fees in connection with the deferred presentment transaction. Any deferred presentment transaction that is made by a person who is required to be licensed pursuant to this chapter but who is not licensed is void, and the person has no right to collect, receive or retain any principal or other fees in connection with that deferred presentment transaction. |
|
|
alittletreefrog
Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 16
Debtcc Points: 665
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 6:41 pm Subject:
|
|
|
Actually this is the new bill that was just re-drafted by a couple of legislator's in Arizona. It is coming up on a vote fairly quickly but please understand that the last bill regarding payday loan companies did not make it off the floor. This bill was redrafted and seems more promising to pass the house and possibly the senate before it is enacted. However, the Arizona law currently is pretty strong but I have to advise you that the AG's office in Arizona is very slow to respond and in many instances sends Arizonans who are involed in internet payday loans to the state in which the company is physically located. However, the DFI of Arizona is much more proactive and will work with individuals and does get results from their inquiries.
|
|
ctraslavina
Joined: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 52
Debtcc Points: 1941
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
