You may be thinking of a Chapter 7 .... if you have substantial equity in a house and file a 7, the trustee could seek a sale of your assets for the benefit of your creditors.
In a 13, because it is a repayment plan, and unless you have substantial assets (I'm talking million-dollar homes, luxury cars, etc), the trustee is very rarely going to try to force the sale of assets. Now I'm not sure exactly what the BK laws are, and what exemptions you get, etc. But my understanding is that you're able to keep your house, even if you have a lot of equity in it.
I've probably seen over a thousand 13 plans filed by my own customers. Most pay out anywhere from 10%-25% to GUC's (General Unsecured Creditors). Figure if you have $200/month to pay into the plan, and you have a plan term of 60 months, that is 200x60 = $12,000 you'd pay over the BK. Now you will have trustee fees of about $3K and probably attorney fees of $3K, which means only about $6K of that $12K goes to repay GUCs. $6K/$50K = 12%, which is within the common range I've always seen.
As far as the credit cards objecting .... Basically here is what I just found in quickly reading some bankruptcy laws :
Quote:
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the court shall confirm a plan if-
. . . .
(4) the value, as of the effective date of the plan, of property to be distributed under the plan on account of each allowed unsecured claim is not less than the amount that would be paid on such claim if the estate of the debtor were liquidated under chapter 7 of this title on such date; . . . .
|
What that means to me is that, as long as your 13 plan pays your GUCs at least at much as they would receive if your house/assets were sold in a Chapter 7, then your plan will be confirmed. Your creditors can file an objection, but under the circumstances I stated above, I don't think they would win. Besides, most credit cards are not going to file a claim, let alone send their attorney in to object to your plan.