unregistered
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,386


Sub: #1 Bad Neighbors
Replied on 06-08-2011, 02:11 PM
Reply With Quote


We were being sued by our neighbors. Forced to claim chapter 7 bankruptcy. They are now telling people that they can still sue because it’s only on a stay. Is this true? There is no judgement and it’s a personal injury case where they claim damages from my husband filing for a protection order against them to keep them from harassing us.
Thanks!




Posts: 13,401
Credits: 95,068


Send message to paulmergel
Sub: #2 not only bad,but stupid
Replied on 06-08-2011, 02:18 PM
Reply With Quote

these people are not only bad,but stupid as well.let's suppose they took you to court prior to you filing BK.the stay would negate the judgement.it would also negate pending lawsuits,garnishments.so again these neighbors are not only bad,but stupid as well.

__________________
giving hope to the hopeless,help to the helpless,and hap to the hapless.

Unregistered
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,386


Sub: #3 Bad neighbors
Replied on 06-08-2011, 03:40 PM
Reply With Quote

They are pretty much stupid.

I still cannot believe that they tried to sue us claiming that we destroyed their name and caused them major personal damage because we tried to protect ourselves. They have made so much trouble for us and it all began over something that had been decided upon and they changed their minds after it was started! Alcoholics.

Oh well. Thanks!

Sub: #4
Replied on 06-08-2011, 06:24 PM
Reply With Quote

While they cannot continue with the current suit at this time, they have thee choices.

1. File a complaint in the bk court asking the bk court to determine that any claim they have against you is non-dischargeable. Then litigate the issues in the bk court. This complaint must be filed within 60 days of your 341 meeting. However, if the complaint is not timely filed any claim they have will be discharged.

2. File the above mentioned complaint timely and then ask the bk court to lift the stay so that they may proceed in state court for a determination of liability and damages. If they are successful then they would bring that determination back to the bk court to have the judge "rubberstamp" it and hold the claim non-dischargeable. This avenue is not frequently used. Typically it is used if the litigation in the state court has progressed to a point where it makes more economic sense to let it continue to its final outcome. Again, remember, if the complaint to determine dischargeability is not filed within 60 days after your 341 meeting, the creditor's claim will be discharged.

3. Do nothing thus allowing you to peacefully get a discharge.

Des.




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 AM.






* Disclosures:
  • By signing up for counseling session, your provided details (Name, Email ID and Phone No.) will be forwarded to the company advertising on the DebtCC. However, you have no obligation to use their services.
  • Some creditors and collection agencies refuse to lower the pay off amount, interest rate, and fees owed by the consumer.
  • Creditors/collection agencies can make collection calls and file lawsuits against the consumers represented by the debt relief companies.
  • Debt relief services may have a negative impact on the consumer's creditworthiness and his overall debt amount may increase due to the accumulation of extra fees.
  • The amount which the consumer saves with the use of debt relief services can be regarded as taxable income.
Page loaded in 0.041 seconds.