Navigation

citi cards collection

Message Author
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:23 am Subject: citi cards collection

I am writing this letter to help you all out. I am a late stage collector (4-6 months) for Citibank, At&T, ANB , and Key Bank Credit Cards. All which are part of the Consumer Card Portfolio for Citi. I am writing this from a collectors standpoint. One we are people most of whom have famlies and children, or we are students working our way through college. I am speaking only from a citi standpoint and no other companies, but we have programs with apr redcutions down to 0% as well as payment reduction programs, though they are based off your CURRENT balance. There are also 5 year programs designed to pay off the acct at a fixed rate of either 9.9% or 0%. Believe it or not we are looking at your account and going damn if they would only pick up the phone and not cuss me out for saying hello I could proably help them out. But 99.9% of people are calling me names before I can get my name out. YES there are collectors that are assholes but chances are the concsumer is being on as well. But all credit cards do have hardship programs and Citi has some great ones. The number to reach Citi is 1-888-309-7367. Mon-Fri 8am-Midnight EST Sat and Sun 8am-9pm EST, If you have a Citi Card call them you will be suprised what they can do for you.

---A Collector / Student

_________________
Register today to encash debtcc points.
collector
Guest




Debtcc Points: 100

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 8:49 am Subject:

Collector,I appreciate your post and I can understand why you would be upset getting cussed out all the time. I do have very little use for collectors because so many of them treat people like dirt.I do agree that if a person can get into some of them programs they will save money and Citi will get their share too. Please post some info on these programs if you are allowed to and also please post if your office follows the guidelines set out in the FDCPA. I am unsure if you are original creditor or not.
_________________
Cajunbulldog
Keeping an eye out for consumers.
http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpa/fdcpact.htm#809
http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcrajump.shtm
http://www.debtconsolidationcare.com/forums/about216.html
Use this letter to protect your rights under the FDCPA
myfairdebt.com & myfaircredit.com-Good source of case law in forums.
cajunbulldog
Moderator
cajunbulldog
Moderator

Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 4886
Debtcc Points: 37793

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:14 pm Subject:

IMO, it is the continuous annoying phone calling that angers people until they reach the boiling point.

After four or five calls with no response, it should be obvious to a collector, the person does not want to talk with them.
When people are pushed to answer their phone out of frustration, of course, they are angry.

I had a collector phone one of my neighbor's a month or or so ago.
The collector accomplished nothing as it only made me angry, and motivated me to send them a C&D letter.
The collector called my neighbor for the sole purpose of trying to embarrass me so I would answer my phone.

Reesie



Leave a quick message for Reesie
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 123
Debtcc Points: 2921

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2007 5:18 am Subject: citi cards

That's a good point collector and a good option for people to have. I think what happens though is when people are unable, for whatever reason to make payments on their credit cards they know you are calling and are embarrassed and/or afraid to pick up the phone thinking that the collector is going to be rude and unreasonable. And I know that not all are, I've dealt with very nice collectors before. About seven years ago instead of a call on a credit card I had I received a letter explaining that if I was having problems they could put me in a program to pay off the card. No more interest fees, no more late charges. I could no longer use the card even after I paid it off, but it was worth it and saved me a bunch of hassles. By sending it in the mail I was able to see what plans they had and call back.

Does citi send out letters like that?

ramj70



Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 203
Debtcc Points: 928

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2007 10:34 am Subject:

I still have to ask, why is using the telephone the only option? My friend has a psychological phobia of telephones and everytime he tried sending letters, the only response he got was 'call us and we can help!'
drjonah



Leave a quick message for drjonah
Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 103
Debtcc Points: 2371

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2007 7:00 pm Subject:

Answer this collector. How come you reduce yourselves down to scum by calling family members, neighbors, and jobs. To belittle and embarrass the holder of the debt to the point where he doesn't even want to talk to you anymore. How would you feel if they did the very same thing to your wonderful "family"
or started calling your "college" that you are working so hard to get through???
Even after numerous attempts to work work out a payment plan with creditors it just seems like you are only interested in the full amount, and just keep calling even though you know the scoop. And you wonder why we don't want to talk with you. Its like trying to tell a fly to stop banging into a window pain because it thinks its going to get out.

_________________
Register today to cash in debtcc points.
michael D
Guest




Debtcc Points: 100

PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2007 8:51 pm Subject:

Quote:
Answer this collector. How come you reduce yourselves down to scum by calling family members, neighbors, and jobs. To belittle and embarrass the holder of the debt to the point where he doesn't even want to talk to you anymore. How would you feel if they did the very same thing to your wonderful "family"


That's a very easy question to answer. Some collectors have ethics and morals, some do not. Interesting that you instantly assume this collector is just like the others. He/she could very well be, but since you don't actually know this person, I think you are jumping the gun a little.

Quote:
After four or five calls with no response, it should be obvious to a collector, the person does not want to talk with them.


Abusive collection methods aside, many more debts would go unpaid if there were no collectors attempting to recoup payment. Collectors are given a batch of accounts to call, and their employer requires them to cold call in addition to performing follow up. There is absolutely nothing wrong with any given collector calling you for a legitimate debt when they adhere to all relevant laws.[/quote]

_________________
The only people with whom you should try to get even are those who have helped you.
-John E. Southard
Morningstar
Moderator
Morningstar
Moderator

Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 1653
Debtcc Points: 10696

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:07 pm Subject:

Quote:
Abusive collection methods aside, many more debts would go unpaid if there were no collectors attempting to recoup payment. Collectors are given a batch of accounts to call, and their employer requires them to cold call in addition to performing follow up. There is absolutely nothing wrong with any given collector calling you for a legitimate debt when they adhere to all relevant laws


Sorry, but I don't agree with your opinion.
It depends on what you consider harrassing.

Calling someone twice a day, seven days a week, is nothing short of harrassment.imo

After five or six calls and leaving messages that are not returned, they should assume the person is not willing to talk with them.

This is exactly why the FDCPA put a regulation in place that a debtor can send a C&D letter to seek relief from the phone calls.

Reesie



Leave a quick message for Reesie
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 123
Debtcc Points: 2921

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 2:09 pm Subject:

you can gain relief from the calls by simply paying what you owe. The FDCPA was not put together as a means for you to get away with not paying your bills.
_________________
Register today to cash in debtcc points.
guest
Guest




Debtcc Points: 100

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 2:32 pm Subject:

Quote:
you can gain relief from the calls by simply paying what you owe. The FDCPA was not put together as a means for you to get away with not paying your bills.


I can also gain relief by sending a C&D letter if this is what I wish to do.
Whether debtor's pay the debt or not, they do have this option.

I don't know of anyone who has indicated that FDCPA regulations were put together as a means to get out of paying bills. Rolling Eyes

Reesie



Leave a quick message for Reesie
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 123
Debtcc Points: 2921

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:32 pm Subject:

Quote:
After five or six calls and leaving messages that are not returned, they should assume the person is not willing to talk with them.


Quote:
It depends on what you consider harrassing.


That's personal opinion, not legal fact. The law requires them to do no such thing. If you wish to change that, you must either bring about the change through legislation, or in a court of law.

Quote:
This is exactly why the FDCPA put a regulation in place that a debtor can send a C&D letter to seek relief from the phone calls.


Absolutely correct. It is up to each individual debtor to exercise their rights. The failure to do so brings many unwanted calls to people's phones.

Quote:
you can gain relief from the calls by simply paying what you owe.


Thank you, guest, for your highly original and informative post. Rolling Eyes No one has ever heard that line before...

_________________
The only people with whom you should try to get even are those who have helped you.
-John E. Southard
Morningstar
Moderator
Morningstar
Moderator

Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 1653
Debtcc Points: 10696

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:55 pm Subject:

Quote:
That's personal opinion, not legal fact. The law requires them to do no such thing.


Apparently, you failed to notice that I ended my statement with "imo".
Quote:
Reesie wrote: Calling someone twice a day, seven days a week, is nothing short of harrassment.imo


I did not imply the law requires them to do such a thing.

Please don't put words in my mouth.
Thank-you~

Reesie



Leave a quick message for Reesie
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 123
Debtcc Points: 2921

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 4:30 pm Subject:

Words were not put into your mouth. I did not address the "imo" portion of your post. I replied to the portion a reader might consider as being more factual...I would not a reader to misconstrue that portion of your post as such.
_________________
The only people with whom you should try to get even are those who have helped you.
-John E. Southard
Morningstar
Moderator
Morningstar
Moderator

Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 1653
Debtcc Points: 10696

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 6:11 pm Subject:

Quote:
Words were not put into your mouth. I did not address the "imo" portion of your post. I replied to the portion a reader might consider as being more factual...I would not a reader to misconstrue that portion of your post as such.


Please advise me what part of my post you are referring to that a reader could misconstrue?

I very clearly stated in my initial post,calling someone twice a day, seven days a week is nothing short of harassing. "imo".

Reader's have their own levels of what they consider harrassment.

I believe most people who have experienced the annoyance of someone calling them twice day,seven days a week, will most likely agree.

I would have let your post slide, but I didn't care for the tone of your comment.
Quote:
The law requires them to do no such thing.


I think the problem here is that someone disagreed with you and maybe you didn't like it. imo








Quote:
Reesie wrote:Sorry, but I don't agree with your opinion.
It depends on what you consider harrassing.

Calling someone twice a day, seven days a week, is nothing short of harrassment.imo

After five or six calls and leaving messages that are not returned, they should assume the person is not willing to talk with them.

This is exactly why the FDCPA put a regulation in place that a debtor can send a C&D letter to seek relief from the phone calls.

Reesie



Leave a quick message for Reesie
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 123
Debtcc Points: 2921

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 7:18 pm Subject:

Quote:
Reader's have their own levels of what they consider harrassment.


And they have only themselves to blame for phone calls that do not meet the legal definition of harassment when they fail to exercise their rights. I.e., not sending a CND letter. Happened to me many years ago.

What I don't want a reader to misinterpret:

Quote:
After five or six calls and leaving messages that are not returned, they should assume the person is not willing to talk with them.


Quote:
It depends on what you consider harassing.


I am sorry you have such an emotional reaction to fact:
Quote:
I would have let your post slide, but I didn't care for the tone of your comment.
Quote:
The law requires them to do no such thing.


Quote:
I think the problem here is that someone disagreed with you and maybe you didn't like it. imo


Sorry, I prefer facts, not opinions. If I wanted to argue, I'd call my ex-W. That said, I'm done with this thread.

_________________
The only people with whom you should try to get even are those who have helped you.
-John E. Southard
Morningstar
Moderator
Morningstar
Moderator

Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 1653
Debtcc Points: 10696

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:29 pm Subject:

Quote:
And they have only themselves to blame for phone calls that do not meet the legal definition of harassment when they fail to exercise their rights. I.e., not sending a CND letter. Happened to me many years ago.


Would you advise me exactly what the legal definition of harassment is, please.
There are quite a lot of variables that play into what may be considered harassment in a Court of Law.

Why in the world would a reader misconstrue the following to the extent my comment would do any harm?
Quote:
Reesie wrote:After five or six calls and leaving messages that are not returned, they should assume the person is not willing to talk with them.


I.E.-If you called an acquaintance five or six times, each time leaving a message with a call back number - would you not assume the acquaintance does not wish to talk to you?
In my opinion, the lack of response speaks for itself.


Quote:
Sorry, I prefer facts, not opinions.

Actually, whether you realize it or not, some of your own statements were opinions. Rolling Eyes

Reesie



Leave a quick message for Reesie
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 123
Debtcc Points: 2921

Quick Reply
Your Name
Subject
Message body
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
1 2  Next  
Page 1 of 2

 
About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Testimonials | Sitemap | Espanol | Media Kit | Terms of Services Navigation
Hacker Safe   Member of IAPDA   DnB Listed