| Message |
Author |
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:28 am Subject: FDCPA Gurus |
|
|
Can someone explain section 807(14) to me. It says: prohibits the "use of any business, company, or organization name other than the [collector's] true name."
I am not sure if I may have some violations.
I have 4 different collection acency company's letterheads trying to collect for lvnv funding llc and 2 different lawfirms
13 letters total.
the different names are
Risk management Alternatives, Inc. (RMA)
Pioneer Credit Recovery Inc.
FMS, Inc.
National Enterprise Systems (NES)
Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP
Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP
They all show LVNV Funding as the current creditor.
with dates ranging from Feb '05 to Nov '07
Can LVNV use these different companies or are these violations?
Thanks
TimberWolfPeach
_________________ Register today to encash debtcc points.
|
|
TimberWolfPeach
Guest

Debtcc Points: 100
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:05 am Subject: |
|
|
I think basically they can't misrepresent themselves, but nothing can stop them from choosing to use various collection companies..it is how they figure to get out of debt validation..just pass the debt along if someone requests DV, and on and on until you get tired of it and pay up. Typical tactic.
_________________ Check out my credit repair blog. http://goldenbast.yesdebtfree.org/
|
|
goldenbast


Joined: 21 Aug 2007
Posts: 1109
Debtcc Points: 15552
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:33 pm Subject: |
|
|
The section you cited mainly is to prevent a CA from using fake business names and/or misrepresenting who they really are I believe. What you described is typical for LVNV; send a validation letter, and they pass it on to some other collection agency. (Because they can't validate).
_________________ He who has freed himself of the disease of "tomorrow" has a chance to attain what he came here for. --G. I. Gurdjieff (1872-1949)
The science is in knowing, the art is in perceiving - Robert Fripp (1946-)
Ever get the feeling you've been cheated? - Johnny Rotten (John Lydon) (1956-)
|
|
LawStudent
Moderator


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 1191
Debtcc Points: 16430
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 3:21 am Subject: |
|
|
to be honest, I would consider this to be harassment, actually. Think about it--
--LVNV knows the collection business, so they know how many times a CA tends to call a debtor
--LVNV then hires several different CA's to go to work, calling the same debtor over the same debt
--LVNV did this knowing full well that using so many CA's would likely result in you getting flooded with contacts from all sides
If one CA were to call you as much as that many CA's typically would, it would no doubt be considered a violation of the fdcpa. Note--the FDCPA prohibits any action which has the natural consequence of harassing or annoying...
However, since these CA's and lawyers have been hired, you pretty much have to tackle each one independently. I would send out DV letters by certified mail to each one. Come to think of it, if you use this as harassment, I would also mention that because they hired all these CA's, it forced you to spend the extra money to send certified letters to all of them instead of just one. But the DV letter is important--it is even possible that not all of these CA's were hired by LVNV. You need them to prove that they have the legal right to try to collect this debt.
honestly, I can only think of one reason why a CA would do this--and that is to harass or annoy a debtor. Doing this causes a whole new dillema--which one to pay, if the debt is really yours? This kind of confusion should not be allowed.
Are you getting any phone calls from them, or is it all just letters? If youre getting phone calls, you should review your phone bills so you can count up exactly how many calls they have made to you. That is evidence if they have all been calling all over the place. I seem to recall a case some time back--cant find it now, but a consumer successfully sued a CA for violating the FDCPA---the court ruled that one CA engaged in harassment by calling that consumer's house something like 10 times in a few days, trying to collect on one debt.
One other thing I would do at this point is check your state's secretary of state website. Many states require that businesses must be licensed or registered in that state in order to conduct business there. If your state has such a law, and any of those CA's isnt registered with your state, then they cannot legally contact you about a debt. That would violate your state laws if that were the case.
|
|
skydivr7673
Debt Samaritan

Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 887
Debtcc Points: 908
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 7:28 am Subject: |
|
|
Not to mention that if they are found to not be licensed, you should file a complaint for that with your state's AG and/or secretary of state. Might as well cause them as much trouble as you can, while you're at it.
_________________ Wulfisms: my blog
The four 'no's of dealing with collectors:
No validation? No payment. No way! No kidding!!
Tellin' you all the zomby troof
Here I'm is, the zomby woof
[Frank Zappa, 1988 - R.I.P.]
|
|
unclewulf
Moderator

Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 2455
Debtcc Points: 19576
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 8:39 pm Subject: |
|
|
Ive actually never talked to them, they may have called a long while ago, but I am not sure. I just thought it may have been a violation but alas no.
Thanks for the replies though.
_________________ Register today to cash in debtcc points.
|
|
TimberWolfPeach
Guest

Debtcc Points: 100
|
|
|
|