Ever heard of "FREDERICK J hANNA AND ASSOCIATES ?

Post New Thread
anie
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #17
Replied on 12-22-2009, 07:40 AM
Reply With Quote

Is it legal & sufficient service of summons if it just gets left on the porch?

Porch Service - No way!
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #18
Replied on 12-23-2009, 06:42 AM
Reply With Quote

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous View Post
Is it legal & sufficient service of summons if it just gets left on the porch?
Absolutely not. Complaints must be personally served on the defendant or a competent adult at the residence.

debtslave911
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #19 admit nothing make them prove everything
Replied on 12-27-2009, 12:09 AM
Reply With Quote

some tips to use against frederick j hanna...
never admit anything to them...
insist on affirmation of "alleged" debt...the original contract with your signature and the credit card co's signature (they never have it)
they fasley claim the credit card company contacted them as their client, a flat out lie...
and finally insist on seeing anything with your signature on it...they have nothing....
I went to the courthouse to challenge them in front of a judge, and it took only 60 seconds to get their dweeb of a laywer wanna be to didmiss the case before we ever got to see the judge.
these sack of shhtz prey upon people who are too afraid to challenge, and hope everybody will settle even for a small percentage of the alleged debt total.
Stand up to these jerks and make them prove everything they are accusing you of!!
Good luck!

flagman
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #20
Replied on 12-29-2009, 10:31 AM
Reply With Quote

How on my credit report can I see whether or not Hanna is working for the CC company or not?

Guest88
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #21
Replied on 01-10-2010, 11:22 PM
Reply With Quote

You can only see that Hanna has pulled your credit. You can't see whethere Hanna is working for the CC company. That is the point. They need to provie it to you.

net info
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #22
Replied on 01-11-2010, 06:51 AM
Reply With Quote

I'm glad I found this. I was served today by these people, a lot of good, useful info on here. Thanks to everyone, I will let you know how it turns out.

unregistered
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #23
Replied on 01-12-2010, 12:54 PM
Reply With Quote

Thank you thank you for your posts. I recently got a letter from hanna, and I am trying to figure out if they actually represent the credit card company. My gut told me know. I have not been served a summons yet, but I too am building a case against them. for a week straight, this twerp tried to verbally harass me on the phone, which I have on tape, (and he knows it)

I plan on going to court, and I am very prepared. These people are idiots.

I suspected they hacked into my credit report when they made up this story of how they got my name, via a debt consolidation company, which was a total lie. It was then that I knew that they did not have a third party relationship with my creditor and now I am going for the jugular.

unregistered
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #24
Replied on 01-12-2010, 03:13 PM
Reply With Quote

I am the process of researching all the back grounds of the attornies

I went to the state bar

listed on the letter

Frederick J. Hanna
Dennis E. Henry
James T Freaney
Louis R. Feingold
Michael S. Peskin
Robert A. Winter
Joseph C. Cooling
Scot D. Groghan
Clayton D. Mosely
S. Louis Schiappa

unregistered
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #25
Replied on 01-12-2010, 03:19 PM
Reply With Quote

Frederick J. Hanna - registered in GA
Dennis E. Henry
James T Freaney
Louis R. Feingold
Michael S. Peskin
Robert A. Winter
Joseph C. Cooling
Scot D. Groghan - Registered in Ga
Clayton D. Mosely
S. Louis Schiappa - Salvadore - Registered in GA

none of the other people showed up on the bar, so either they are licensed in other states, or not licensed at all.

unregistered
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #26
Replied on 01-13-2010, 10:04 AM
Reply With Quote

Guess what!! The whole law firm is not even licensed in my state!

unregistered
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #27
Replied on 01-14-2010, 08:35 AM
Reply With Quote

the stupidity of this firm, OMG! They got my cease and desist, and now they are masking their calls using a Bank of america number on their caller id.

so now, they are violating federal and state, telephonic law, as well, federal and state consumer protection laws.

Since I do not have a pre existing relationship with this business. stupid stupid stupid..

I am so taking them to court.

unregistered
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #28
Replied on 01-14-2010, 08:36 AM
Reply With Quote

BTW, I got it all on tape. I called the number back and it was a Bank of america rep telling me it was Frederick J hanna, just using their number to get me to answer the phone. Hmmm.... federal telephonic law, is $500 per violation.. Cha ching! I am so suing.. I am also getting them for misrepresenting themselves, they do not even have the power to sue in my state.

Going to Court
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #29 Here we come Fred!
Replied on 01-24-2010, 01:18 PM
Reply With Quote

We were served back in December by Hanna and promptly answered the lawsuit. Hanna attached some stock credit card agreement to the complaint and, despite numerous demands ever since, to validate the debt our requests have gone unanswered. Interestingly, Hanna's goons continue to contact us in an effort to set up payment arrangements to avoid "further inconvenience." I have some bad news for Hanna - we will be in court tomorrow with a little surprise with us.

Although we are scared, we will not be ruled by fear from scum like Hanna. If they are going to garnish anything from us, it will not happen without a fight. Hanna will need to prove his case to get anything.

Worrier99
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #30
Replied on 01-25-2010, 03:24 AM
Reply With Quote

Thank you for all the advice here. I too was served 1-16 with a summons from Hanna & Co. There seems to be a pattern -- after I sent the DV letter, I get this reply from a "legal assistant" who just re-states the amount. About 1-1/2 month later, I get hit with a lawsuit.

Can anyone help me with a template or some ideas for answering such a lawsuit? This was filed in Superior Court, in GA. Do I file a Motion to dismiss? Intent to defend? I have no idea.




Posts: 17,302
Credits: 156,355


Send message to Shazzers
Sub: #31
Replied on 01-25-2010, 05:28 AM
Reply With Quote

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous View Post
Thank you for all the advice here. I too was served 1-16 with a summons from Hanna & Co. There seems to be a pattern -- after I sent the DV letter, I get this reply from a "legal assistant" who just re-states the amount. About 1-1/2 month later, I get hit with a lawsuit.
Can anyone help me with a template or some ideas for answering such a lawsuit? This was filed in Superior Court, in GA. Do I file a Motion to dismiss? Intent to defend? I have no idea.
That definitely doesn't constitute validation. A letter from an employee is heresay. I am going to forward this post to skydvr, he is well versed in this type of situation. Meanwhile, keep checking back for more replies.


Screw Hanna
Anonymous
Posts: n/a
Credits: 50,410


Sub: #32
Replied on 01-25-2010, 07:25 AM
Reply With Quote

I am please to report the case Hanna filed against us was dismissed this morning. The attorney for Hanna's office said he read our answer and wanted to know what our position was on the alleged amounts due, attorneys fees etc. I told him we would not confirm or deny anything absent some admissible evidence to support their claims. He then pulled out a voluntary dismissal and said it would "take a couple days to get that kind of evidence". I chuckled to myself and though 'you've had 2 months since filing this bogus lawsuit to gather your evidence - you and your client have none.'

It was nerve-wracking, but we stuck to our guns and you should too. As much as we hate Hanna, I must admit the lawyer that appeared on behalf of Hanna (Daniel Greene) was very professional and calm. He was a young lawyer and I hope he finds employment somewhere other Than hann's office.




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:49 AM.






* Disclosures:
  • By signing up for counseling session, your provided details (Name, Email ID and Phone No.) will be forwarded to the company advertising on the DebtCC. However, you have no obligation to use their services.
  • Some creditors and collection agencies refuse to lower the pay off amount, interest rate, and fees owed by the consumer.
  • Creditors/collection agencies can make collection calls and file lawsuits against the consumers represented by the debt relief companies.
  • Debt relief services may have a negative impact on the consumer's creditworthiness and his overall debt amount may increase due to the accumulation of extra fees.
  • The amount which the consumer saves with the use of debt relief services can be regarded as taxable income.
Page loaded in 0.057 seconds.