I live in GA and was served by Hanna and Associates for a Capital One account.
In Georgia, or at least in my county, people being sued must have a court mediation to see if we can work it out without a hearing. We had ours on Wednesday. The lawyer said he can do $xxx amount with $xx/month payments. I told him I cannot and will not make those payments. He then pulled out a copy of the generic Customer Agreement(that several of us have seen) with no signature on it, but with the phrase "cap 1 4-1-05 to 6-30-08" written in pen in the top right-hand corner. I told him I want to go to the hearing next week. He then said he had some statements. He then pulled out a Capital One photocopied "statement" that had a name on it that may or may not be mine. It only had the amounted owed on it. Nothing saying when or if the card in question was used. He said, "You should really just set up a payment arrangement because of this." I looked at it for a good 10 minutes before saying, "Let's just go to the hearing." He then said, "How about this. I am able to cut it down to $yyy.yyy with $yy.yy/month payments." If he is able to cut it down just like that, I'm sure he could go lower. I looked at him and said again, "Let's just stop wasting time. I'll see you Wednesday for our hearing." I'm pretty sure from what I have read here that due to the agreement having some clause about the agreement being based on VA's statue of limitations. I think the SOL in VA is 3 years. I'm doing research still. If that is so, shouldn't the court dismiss it? My other concern is the photocopied "statement" their lawyer had. I don't feel that is enough to prove I owe a debt. In my answer, I added my affirmative defense. It stated this as my D:
1. Lack of Privity with the plaintiff.
2. Unjust Enrichment
3. The plaintiff is not the real party interest and has failed to name all necessary parties
4. Plaintiff fails to state a claim
5. Plaintiff failed to provide any contract or agreement bearing a signature of the defendant nor any itemized statements or billing of debts
6. Plaintiff failed to provide proof of a relationship between themselves and the alleged original creditor and the authority of the plaintiff to collect the debt on behalf of the original creditor.
I had a couple more defenses listed, but I can't remember at the moment. Should I worry? I am going to ask the FJH lawyer for a voluntary dismissal with prejudice on Wednesday before the hearing anyways. Also, thanks for forum. While this is the first time posting, I have followed it. I wouldn't have made it though mediation without you all. So, thanks!
- notasimpleway
Edit: Also, I noticed the list of cases for that day had several Cap1 cases by FJH. But none of them were consistent on how Capital One was listed as the plaintiff. The papers I was served with say, "CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A." while others were "CAPITAL ONE" and "CAPITAL ONE BANK". You would think they would use the same name for plaintiff since they seem to "represent" Cap1 all the time. This just reminded me of this guy that kept getting sued, but they were all dismissed because the name(s)/business(es) listed were wrong. I know it's the plaintiff and doesn't matter most likely, but still. If you're gonna sue, get your name(s) correct.