first, your original post was never deleted, it is still right there where you left it.
Second, your contact information is not the solicitation--you tried to sell your business, ask people to call you with any questions, and then say "if we arent the right fit for you we'll try to point you in the right direction". None of that does anything to explain your fee structure in any way--it's selling, pure and simple. So far, you have yet to actually say anything that explains your fee structure--all you did was try to sell the business as not being a scam and then ask for people to call you. Your contact info isnt the solicitation--its only the means you left for people to act on the solicitation. Do you really think that someone couldnt simply take the name of your company that you posted and search out the number because you didnt include it in your second post?
I dont see anything about "fee structure" or "policy and procedure" there. This is what you posted:
[queto]We do get many cases resolved before it ever goes to court usually through a
stipulated judgment or voluntary dismissal submitted to the defendant by the plaintiff
attorney[/queto].

Â*
[queto]We keep our overhead down to provide a valuable service at a low cost[/queto].
[queto]here are a lot of scams out there, but we try to help people find favorable
resolutions so everybody can get on with their lives[/queto].
[queto]We don't sell, but merely explain the process. If we aren't the right fit for you, we will
be happy to try to point you in the right direction to find a resolution by your own
means.[/queto]
If youre not making sure that the plaintiff validates the debt before youre charging your client money to mediate the issue, then something is wrong. You negotiate lower settlements with creditors--and then charge the consumer so that they have to pay both you and the debt collector. But what if the debt collector doesnt have anything to prove that they even have the right to collect the debt? Then your "valued customer" is now out the money they paid you, PLUS the money they paid on this unvalidated debt! And, to make matters worse, youre on here, in a forum where we encourage everyone to get validation FIRST before paying, trying to skip over that part in order to get paid. Come to think of it, why would a legitimate debt collector with a legitimately-owed and properly documented debt even agree to your terms? They have all the aces in their hand at that point. A legitimate debt collector would be able to prove the debt, prove the amount owed, prove who owes it, and they would have already done their homework before filing a lawsuit so that they would know if the defendant is capable of paying or not! WHY would they agree to LESS money if they know they have it in the bag for MORE money legitimately? The debt collection business is all about profit--why would they minimize their profit when at that point collection of a judgment is a non-issue, what with bank levies and wage garnishments available to them?
Like I said, youre most welcome to share your experience with us, but lets not try to get smartass here about how "I didnt know explaining policy was solicitation". You know what you posted, let's be honest already.