Navigation
  #17  
Old 11-28-2008, 06:31 AM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

OK I filed my answer and now I guess I have to wait. I got the letter from the court for the case management conference and it isn't till March of next year, WTF!!!!

Should I send them a request for production of documents and also should I send them interrogatories OR should I wait for them to send to me first?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #18  
Old 11-28-2008, 06:40 AM
NASCAR_Devil's Avatar
NASCAR_Devil NASCAR_Devil is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,566
Credits: 26,618
Default

I'd go ahead and get the jump on them. Hit them with the Request for POD and Interrogatories. If they don't respond w/in the timeframe outlined in your states RCP, then hit them with a Motion to Compel
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #19  
Old 12-02-2008, 10:22 AM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default Norfolk Financial Company and Forsyth "Law" office

I have been in a battle with this ass and his "lawyer" for a while now, but sadly, even the courts seem to be on their side, at least at the district court I went to. Even after well presented evidence that Norfolk was still unlawfully running a collection business through Forsyth Law (which is just a collection agency with a law degree) the "couldn't be bothered-what time is lunch" judge denied my motion.

I want to start a class action against this creep. Who's in?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #20  
Old 12-02-2008, 06:23 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

I heard there is a group of people who are in fact going after him but there is not enough people yet. I am one of them people. I have been in contact with a person who started it all and I guess it's a wait and see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #21  
Old 12-03-2008, 03:44 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

OK I got the Interrogatories, request for admissions and request for production of documents today. They want my Social Security number, every credit card and bank account I have or had including the account numbers. Do I have to give them this information?

Also in the interrogatories they say it's an Compucredit/Emerge credit card but in the summons they put a credit card agreement for Providian. What kind of morons are they?

They also say I have no valid defenses to any action and any answer filed in this case was alleged in bad faith and was for the purpose of interposing delay.

They also say I am liable for amounts set forth in this complaint plus all costs for collection, including attorney fees.

WTF!!!!!!!!!! IT IS NOT MY BILL!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #22  
Old 12-03-2008, 05:35 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

anyone???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #23  
Old 12-03-2008, 07:50 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

Ehh I just answered that giving my SS # is an invasion of my privacy rights along with all my credit card numbers I have now and all the bank accounts I have or had since 2000.

I told them I am disabled and I am Judgment proof 2 times already what a bunch of morons. They can't even use spell check, a lot of misspelling in the interrogatories. Plus I compared his signature on the court documents to signatures he has on the secretary of state website and they are not even close, I think they are forged and I think he never even reviewed the case and the debt collector is the one filing everything under his name.

Let them waste their money cause they can't get a dime out of me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #24  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:07 AM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

Guest, someone will be along to assist you with this matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #25  
Old 12-04-2008, 09:33 AM
goldenbast's Avatar
goldenbast goldenbast is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,733
Credits: 20,988
Default

Well, you could answer that since it is not, nor ever has been your debt, they are not entitled to such personal information. With any question about the debt itself, answer: Without sufficient documentation to render an answer.

As for them trying to say you are just stalling..I would slap a big fat DISAGREE on that. As a matter of fact, when you send yours, you should put the same exact thing..only they are delaying with producing documentation because they don't have any because none exist because it is not your bill.

Are you countersuing for violations?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #26  
Old 12-04-2008, 06:35 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

I already denied all allegations in my answer to the summons so I should probably stick with that. If I start saying I can't answer without proof they will think I am lying,right?

I plan on calling the attorney general tomorrow along with the Boston Globe, they did a number of stories on Norfolk Financial Corp. in the past so maby they will do it again and hopefully get more people to act on a class action lawsuit. He is not a licensed debt collector so anyone that was forced to pay him are entitled to get their money back.

I was going to countersue but I made a note of the violations in my answer but never said I was countersuing. It might be too late now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #27  
Old 12-06-2008, 07:09 AM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

I got all my stuff together and was up till 2 in the AM. 19 pages typed.

I answered the interrogatories, request for docs, admissions.

I am also serving them a Request for production of documents and first set of interrogatories. I put about 7 items I want for documents, and I also have about 16 interrogatories i am sending them. They want to play hardball I can do the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #28  
Old 12-10-2008, 05:11 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

Now the waiting game, papers served and accepted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #29  
Old 12-11-2008, 12:44 AM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

Guest, GOOD LUCK...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #30  
Old 12-12-2008, 03:32 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

OK so I filed my interrogatories and request for production of documents. With the questions I want them to answer, which I know all are true, how do you think I will fare with them responding? For the request of production of documents I pretty much put everything that you would ask for in a debt validation letter.

For the interrogatories I asked pretty much everything that the owner of Norfolk Financial corp has done. Research his name Daniel W. Goldstone and you will see what I mean,lol.

Another thing I did was went to the BBB website and looked up Norfolk Financial Corp.. The address they use in the summons the BBB cannot contact them at, mail was returned as undelivered no address available. The other 2 addresses, one a Boston P.O. box which is the same as above has a D+ rating and the other is a RI address and that has a F rating,lol. So I plan on bringing all this information to the hearing to show the guy has a poor reputation in the business he conducts.


Anyone else have some tips for me that will help me win this case easier?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #31  
Old 12-12-2008, 04:23 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

Oh and I just sent a nice letter to the Division Of Banks. I told them I am fed up with this illegal company and I want something done or I am going to the attorney general, the governor the senate and whoever else I have to contact to put a stop to this.

I really am FUC*ING PISSED RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #32  
Old 12-13-2008, 07:03 PM
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Credits: 0 [Check]
Default

I just noticed another thing. Norfolk Financial Corp. has a registered agent in Massachusetts. It is Peabody & Arnold LLP, one of Bostons oldest law firms. I looked up Peabody & Arnold LLP and noticed they have 6 attorney's who deal with fdcpa and FCRA violations.

Do you think I should give them a call and tell them the person who they are a registered agent for is an unlicensed debt collector and is suing me on a debt that is not mine? Plus should I tell them all the other corrupt things they are doing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Name:
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Options

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:42 AM.




About Us | Contact Us | Affiliate | Sitemap | Espanol | RSS Feeds| Terms of Services Navigation