ok, this time, you need to make motion for dismissal "with prejudice" to the court during the hearing. This is VERY important--last time you were able to show that they could not prove the account as yours. You were also able to show that the only providian account you ever had was paid off in full years ago. Take this same information to the hearing again, and present it to the judge--state that you have repeatedly asked for proof of the debt and they have consistently failed to provide it. Thats why you won a dismissal last time. The "with prejudice" is very important-it would deny them the ability to sue you again over the same debt.
At the same time, stipulate to the court that you request that the court forbid the plaintiff from selling the debt to some other junk debt buyer--that way, you wont end up getting sued again in two more years from some other collector on the same debt.
It also would be a good idea to bring documentation that you paid off your providian account--if you could get a letter from them stating that you paid your account in full, that would be a huge boost to your case. If you can get them to send you a letter like this, also ask them to state in there that this was the only providian account you had. That way, the CA wont have a chance.
golden mentioned countersuing--I would definitely do this. But I did find a Norfolk Financial Copr. listed in the Mass. corporations database, and they have been registered there for some years now it seems. I found two addresses in Boston for the company:
30 Rowes Wharf, Boston MA
600 Atlantic Ave. Boston, MA
is the address you have the same as one of those? Now, I dont know all the laws up there, this is only the secretary of state's corporations database. Your state may have an additional requirement that any debt collectors be registered with the banking commission or some other financial agency in order to operate in MA.....you'll have to check on that one. But they are at least registered to conduct general business in MA, unless this is a different company. That is something you need to look into before you head to court. If you find that they are still not legally operating there, you need to throw the book at them. fdcpa offenses carry a total penalty of up to $1000 in statutory damages, no matter if they break the FDCPA one time or a hundred. But I would still go after them for that. I would state the following in a countersuit:
1--list FDCPA violations in detail, including the portion of the FDCPA that addresses what they did.
2--state that they are not legally operating in MA, and were told to stop conducting business, but have ignored that and have continued to illegally operate there--state this ONLY if the company I mentioned isnt the same one as the collector thats suing you.
3--state that you are seeking actual damages due to harassment and stress--for example:
--they sued you once, and their lawsuit was frivolous, it was dismissed because they could not prove anything about their claims.
--they have repeatedly changed their story, claiming different original creditors and different amounts allegedly owed.
--they now have brought a second suit against you on the same exact debt that they have refused to provide proper validation for. This constitutes yet another frivolous lawsuit.
Also, to make sure that these guys really get a wake-up call, I would contact the bar association in your state, and file a formal complaint against this attorney's office. Bar associations tend to look kinda seriously at lawyers who make a habit of filing frivolous lawsuits and you now have this same one doing it twice to you on the same BS case. Repeated behavior like this can eventually get a lawyer disbarred. Its often taken that seriously.
Be very thorough, get everything together that you possibly can and take it all to the hearing, and prepare to slam-dunk them.