Posts: 224
Credits: 3,324


Send message to IPoured
Sub: #49
Replied on 03-19-2009, 11:16 AM
Reply With Quote

Does anyone know exactly what a motion to dismiss without prejudice means?




Posts: 4,687
Credits: 30,286


Send message to NASCAR_Devil
Sub: #50
Replied on 03-19-2009, 11:18 AM
Reply With Quote

It means that the action is being dismissed leaving the plaintiff the ability to re-file

Posts: 224
Credits: 3,324


Send message to IPoured
Sub: #51
Replied on 03-19-2009, 11:37 AM
Reply With Quote

I was told that I need to get a ruling from the judge on my motion to set aside default judgement. Does anyone know why or how the judge expects this case will be resolved by the plaintiff filing a "motion to dismiss w/o prejudice"? How do I do I make sure that the judge knows I need a ruling on my motion? It just seems that the courts want me to just go away with a filing of dismissal.



Posts: 1,449
Credits: 11,549


Send message to smo65d11
Sub: #52
Replied on 03-19-2009, 11:48 AM
Reply With Quote

is that what the judges chambers told you today?


Posts: 224
Credits: 3,324


Send message to IPoured
Sub: #53
Replied on 03-19-2009, 12:10 PM
Reply With Quote

I've only been talking with the clerks at the court house. Remember last week, (right after I filed my motion to set aside default judgment) the judge told the clerk (and the clerk told me) that if the plaintiff doesn't file a dismissal (?dismissal?) of the case within 2 days then he was going to set it for trial. I asked the clerk today (6 days later) if the judge was planning on making a ruling on my motion or going to set it up for a hearing? They told me to call back tommorrow by noon and the judge may have done something by then. You know that feeling you get like you are forgetting to do something or feel like you need to be doing something? I've got that! Do you think I need to write a letter to the judge about my case and file it today.

This is my theory about what could be going on here... If the plaintiff files dismissal of the case with the court, then the judge will erase the default judgement as though it never happened? Can he even do that??????? The consumer attorney I have is waiting on a ruling on the motion to set aside default judgment. Maybe there HAS to be a default judgment AND an order to set aside default judgement for the consumer attorney to have a good case for the FDCA violations. Theory feedback anyone? Argh!

Posts: 224
Credits: 3,324


Send message to IPoured
Sub: #54
Replied on 03-19-2009, 12:18 PM
Reply With Quote

Oh my I forgot to mention that when I called the attorney's for plaintiff today the legal assistant there also told me that Palisades sold my PIF account to a compnay called Track America. She said track america has had the account since last May (May 0. Palisades sued me last August (0 and has last reported to CB last Dec. (0 She even gave me the contact name for a guy over at track america. They are probably just trying to get me outta thier hair, idk.



Posts: 1,449
Credits: 11,549


Send message to smo65d11
Sub: #55
Replied on 03-24-2009, 07:49 AM
Reply With Quote

any new updates on this problem with Palisades?


Posts: 224
Credits: 3,324


Send message to IPoured
Sub: #56
Replied on 03-24-2009, 08:59 AM
Reply With Quote

The consumer rights attorney is waiting on resolution of the case (order to set aside default judgement) before he will take over. I filed motion to set aside with court but so far only motion to dismiss has been granted. (A motion to dismiss the case does not take care of the judgement.) So I guess I am still waiting on the judge to enter a ruling on my motion for setting aside default judgement.



Posts: 1,449
Credits: 11,549


Send message to smo65d11
Sub: #57
Replied on 03-24-2009, 10:54 AM
Reply With Quote

do you know when that might happen?




Posts: 1,449
Credits: 11,549


Send message to smo65d11
Sub: #58
Replied on 03-24-2009, 10:54 AM
Reply With Quote

do you know when that might happen?


Posts: 224
Credits: 3,324


Send message to IPoured
Sub: #59
Replied on 03-24-2009, 11:17 AM
Reply With Quote

I just got off the phone with the clerk at the courthouse and she said that the judge has only ruled on (granted) the plaintiff's motion to dismiss with prejudice. Clerk said my motion to vacate judgement along with my motion to dismiss with prejudice is still in the judges office. She told me to check back Friday.

My motion to dismiss also included a request the court to:

Due to the correct status of this debt, and due to the plaintif's fraudulent and deceptive handing of this matter, I therefore ask that the court vacate and set aside the judgment against me and consider this matter dismissed with prejudice. I also ask that the court to order plaintiff to reflect the correct status of this debt as settled in full and correct all of the information that has been falsely reported to all of the credit bureaus.

Maybe this is why he he is taking longer to rule on my motions. If the plaintiff and the defendent both file a motion to dismiss, does the judge have to rule on both motions individually?

The judge won't be back in until Friday, so I will just have to sit tight till then.



Posts: 1,449
Credits: 11,549


Send message to smo65d11
Sub: #60
Replied on 03-24-2009, 11:27 AM
Reply With Quote

well please report back as soon as you know anything at all!


Posts: 224
Credits: 3,324


Send message to IPoured
Sub: #61
Replied on 03-27-2009, 03:49 PM
Reply With Quote

Friday - I just wanted to report back on my progress. I am celebrating the completion of my first feat....DISMISSED AND JUDGMENT SET ASIDE! Oh my does it feel really good to assert your legal civil rights! I faxed all of the requested information over to the consumer rights attorney that smo65d11 found for me. Thank you smo! I will be waiting to hear from them. Due to the Colorado blizzard I may have to wait to hear back.

Posts: 224
Credits: 3,324


Send message to IPoured
Sub: #62
Replied on 03-27-2009, 04:01 PM
Reply With Quote

I just checked my mail and they sent me another copy of the motion to dismiss. This is the third one sent! Why so many? The first one was a "motion to dismiss without prejustice", the second one was a "motion to dismiss with prejudice" and the third one I received today is a "motion to dismiss with prejudice". Except the one received today has this added.

1. This matter has been resolved by and between the parties and accordingly believes that it would be in the best interest of all parties concerned that the matter be dismissed as to all claims, on as to the other.

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? Does this mean that they cannot be sued as to any FDCPA or FCRA violation?!!!!

If this is so this would explain why it has been taking so long for the judge to rule on my motion to set aside.



Posts: 1,191
Credits: 7,116


Send message to FloridaRon
Sub: #63
Replied on 03-27-2009, 08:12 PM
Reply With Quote

I thought, and I may be wrong, that FDCPA violation cases are separate from the debts themselves. So, no matter what happens with the original debt case, you should still be able to pursue the FDCPA case.

Of course, I'm not attorney so someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

__________________
-
Sorry Meg. Daddy loves ya, but Daddy also loves Star Trek, and in all fairness, Star Trek was here first.
... Peter Griffin/Family Guy
-



Posts: 1,449
Credits: 11,549


Send message to smo65d11
Sub: #64
Replied on 03-28-2009, 05:19 PM
Reply With Quote

please let us know what the attorney says (and I was happy to help you!)





Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 AM.





* Disclosures:
  • By signing up for counseling session, your provided details (Name, Email ID and Phone No.) will be forwarded to the company advertising on the DebtCC. However, you have no obligation to use their services.
  • Some creditors and collection agencies refuse to lower the pay off amount, interest rate, and fees owed by the consumer.
  • Creditors/collection agencies can make collection calls and file lawsuits against the consumers represented by the debt relief companies.
  • Debt relief services may have a negative impact on the consumer's creditworthiness and his overall debt amount may increase due to the accumulation of extra fees.
  • The amount which the consumer saves with the use of debt relief services can be regarded as taxable income.
Page loaded in 0.115 seconds.