It may be that payday loan companies are illegal in Ga., I don't know. I know they're severely regulated in most states, and required to be licensed. If they're not registered in your state as a foreign corporation (that means out of state, not just out of the U.S.), then they don't exist in your state and can't file suit unless there's a statute that authorizes it.
I've begun to wonder whether the offshore payday loan sharks aren't fronts for terrorist organizations who are ripping off Americans in order to finance their war against us.
I have come to the conclusion from most of the comments I've read about people's experiences with payday loan companies that they are in serious violation of Federal law, specifically the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) which provides both criminal penalties as well as a civil cause of action to any individual or class aggrieved by the actions of people who violate the law. One of the predicate crimes is the making of extortionate loans. The definitions are included in the statute I'm going to include here:
==
Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Crimes
Extortionate Credit Transactions
18 U.S.C. § 892 - Making extortionate extensions of credit
(a) Whoever makes any extortionate extension of credit, or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(b) In any prosecution under this section, if it is shown that all of the following factors were present in connection with the extension of credit in question, there is prima facie evidence that the extension of credit was extortionate, but this subsection is nonexclusive and in no way limits the effect or applicability of subsection (a):
(1) The repayment of the extension of credit, or the performance of any promise given in consideration thereof, would be unenforceable, through civil judicial processes against the debtor
(A) in the jurisdiction within which the debtor, if a natural person, resided or
(B) in every jurisdiction within which the debtor, if other than a natural person, was incorporated or qualified to do business at the time the extension of credit was made.
(2) The extension of credit was made at a rate of interest in excess of an annual rate of 45 per centum calculated according to the actuarial method of allocating payments made on a debt between principal and interest, pursuant to which a payment is applied first to the accumulated interest and the balance is applied to the unpaid principal.
(3) At the time the extension of credit was made, the debtor reasonably believed that either
(A) one or more extensions of credit by the creditor had been collected or attempted to be collected by extortionate means, or the nonrepayment thereof had been punished by extortionate means; or
(B) the creditor had a reputation for the use of extortionate means to collect extensions of credit or to punish the nonrepayment thereof.
(4) Upon the making of the extension of credit, the total of the extensions of credit by the creditor to the debtor then outstanding, including any unpaid interest or similar charges, exceeded $100.
(c) In any prosecution under this section, if evidence has been introduced tending to show the existence of any of the circumstances described in subsection (b)(1) or (b)(2), and direct evidence of the actual belief of the debtor as to the creditor's collection practices is not available, then for the purpose of showing the understanding of the debtor and the creditor at the time the extension of credit was made, the court may in its discretion allow evidence to be introduced tending to show the reputation as to collection practices of the creditor in any community of which the debtor was a member at the time of the extension.
====
Linear Mode
