Quote:
Many collection companies take advantage of this part by giving an amount of $1500 on a $200 loan taken. The debtor wants to know the fact how the loan amount has boiled up to this amount within a period of few months. The agency replies, "we can't send you anything in writing..." How will the debtor know if the charges tacked with the principal amount are legitimate since the creditor won't give any information on the account as they don't have it?
that is when you would have to contact the original creditor to see what the balance is. then you can compare that with the balance the collection agency is trying to collect. although the original creditor probably won't send you another detailed statement, they at least should be able to let you know the final balance that was turned over for collections.
Quote:
One collection agency calls a person and asks him to pay on a certain debt. During these times, debtors contact the creditors with the account info. And see if they are holding that one with them. Yes, they are and also they are willing to work with them. But the collection agency insists that all payments have to be made to them. Why should that be? If the creditor has not sold the account to a collection agency, why they will pay to them? Since the collection agency is not giving any accurate info about the accounts, there is no reason for them to hound the debtor.
not correct. most of the time collection agencies are hired to collect on behalf of other companies. once that account is transfered to the collection agency, that agency in is charge of the account. period. and like i said before, it is against the law for two companies to collect on the same debt at a time.
look at it this way - you can't collect on a debt so you hire my services to collect for you. if i can collect the money i get a certain % of that amount for me to keep. if you start trying to collect on that account and you end up getting paid, then i get nothing. and odds are i have already made 200 calls to that person and wasted countless hours on that account. clients have contract with agencies and a general rule is that the client can NOT solicit payment from the debtors.
Quote:
So, does this mean that all options of getting the complete break up of an account come to an end here? And the debtor has to pay what the collector is asking for without anything on paper?
sorry, but the only other option i can think of is hiring an attorney to delve deeper into the situation. however, collection activity does continue until the agency gets full attorney information.
Quote:
There are still some good people in the collection field who will not oppress the debtor. And such good people will never tamper the accounts of the debtor understanding the fact that he already in a financial turmoil. But what to do with the other portion of people who are a bad name to the collection field?
know the laws and know your rights!!
Quote:
You will find most of the people in this forum complaining about such incidences. They know that they have a past debt and it needs to be paid but they want to be sure that their money goes to their debt account and not into someone's pocket.
yes, that's a tough situation. collection agencies are businesses. and like all businesses, some are more law-abiding than others. however, is it fair to look at all collection agencies are evil and out to rip people off? in this day and age, you could walk around all day and find excuses as to why you shouldn't trust every single company you find. how about making a purchase online from bestbuy.com? how about getting your car repaired? how about signing up for your household utilities? you have to give them your ss#, right? i understand collection agencies have a bad wrap, but it's unfair to assume your payment will not be applied properly to the account which you owe on!