Internet's first get-out-of-debt community - 136,000 members

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 12:09 pm Subject:

what then were the findings of the hearing?.. I am assuming that the hearing was a result of allegations that were investigated and then a statement of charges or allegations was prepared and a hearing was held to review them and determine if further action was necessary, if so then there must be a findings of fact or some similar end result of the hearing

Guest · Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 12:23 pm Subject:

"Information", sounds to me like you may Mr. David or a collegue of Mr. Kuperstein's office. Please enlighten us with answers to JJ's questions. In the meanwhile, I will check the Upper Canada website for my own personal curiosity. How on earth could a company that conducts business so illegitimately get off - can't see that happening "Information" or are you just trying to intimidate people into believing that nothing happened in order to come across that your company operates legitimately?
P.S. Still waiting for a follow-up call from you but then again it has only been 7 months since your last boggus call when I asked for validity. In return, you cowardly hung up and surprise, surprise, haven't heard from you again.

Guest · Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 1:12 pm Subject:

Wait to see the updates on the LSOUC site and read for yourself. You people seem to seek trouble.

Information · Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 1:40 pm Subject:

For some strange reason, my posts seem to be getting lost!
To all concerned, follow up with the LSOUC site for info pertaining to this nonsence.

Guest · Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 1:52 pm Subject:

I suggest "Guest / Information" you re-read your comment and ask yourself who really is the one looking to seek trouble as it is certainly not the victims of Paul Kuperstein, etc.
AND I eagerly wait to see the updates as I am sure it will be just as long as I have been waiting to get another call back from this boggus firm - which will more likely than not be NEVER as they have no leg to stand on and they know it. I am sure you will have yet another comment defending this firm.

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:25 pm Subject:

According to the website it was a) a disciplinary hearing meaning that there was sufficient evidence upon investigation to hold a hearing and b) based on the text of the hearing schedule the charges do relate to actions indicatinve of some of the issues raised herein.

As of today there haev been no outcomes posted. An email was sent to the law society asking about the outcome. the response will be posted here when received

Guest · Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 5:39 am Subject:

Thanks JJ!

Guest · Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 7:54 am Subject:

You're not a victim of Paul Kupferstein's, your a victim of unpaid debt.

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 9:03 am Subject: Hearing Results

The following are the results of the hearing. While it appears to be a slap on the wrist, it is something that most good attorneys would be emabarrased about. Additionally it means that any transgressions should continue to be reported as bar associations (law Societies) tend to get a little cranky with repeat offenders..

have received your email re Kupferstein matter, file number CN88/05. The Hearing panel ordered that the member be admonished and costs payable to the Law Society in the amount of $750.00.

A copy of the order can be sent to you via mail or facsimile.

Should you require any further assistance please contact the Tribunals Office directly at 416-947-5249 or via email at tribunals @ lsuc.on.ca.

Thank you

Mirka Adamsky-Rackova
Administrator
Tribunals Office
The Law Society of Upper Canada
(416) 947-3300, x 2238

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 9:05 am Subject:

To the last Guest post.. this kind of post is unproductive and without merit. Please refrain from posting these pointless slams.

Guest · Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:20 pm Subject:

Yes Mr. David (aka Guest) not only refrain from these posts, if would be great if you could refrain altogether and slum away and not be heard from again BUT unfortunately you know nothing else.

Intimidated · Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:27 pm Subject:

Thank you JJ for the information. Either way, Paul Kuperstein, Mr. David, etc. are never EVER going to receive a cent from me and as long as this forum maintains available to other victims, I hope they do the same. The more people find out about this scam of a company, the better for everyone. Do you get it now Mr. David, not ever will you receive a cent from me and I am still waiting for a follow-up call as I can see others on the forum are too! No matter what happens with charges being laid, complaints being made, etc. you will never get anything from me and hopefully everyone else too. NOT EVER.

Guest · Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 8:43 pm Subject:

You still don't understand. Intimidated, good on you, never pay PK a cent - but pay the company that you are indebted to. Not paying for a service that you were provided is theft. You've committed a crime. The charges against Mr. Kupferstein were for allegedly not properly supervising his staff and mailing a letter(s) from and address other than his own. Clearly a slap on the wrist is all that was deserved.
JJ, how is pointing out to someone that their unpaid debt is what precipitated Mr. Kupfersteins office to contact them a pointless slam?

Trevor · Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 8:48 pm Subject:

I've been skimming through all of these collection agency things, and it seems like some people just don't want to pay for a bill.

Intimidated · Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 6:55 am Subject:

This is for Guest otherwise known as "Mr. David" - I DON'T OWE A CENT!!!! So explain this to me, why are you calling me and threatening me? I expect from you a response to my question or have you not been taught how to response to that one and just hang up the phone and never call back again KNOWING you will not receive money from yet another victim of this office. Slap on the wrist is all you say this boggus law firm deserves??? Clearly you lack much intelligent in this matter or are completely oblivious to the way you conduct yourself. My suggestion to Paul Kuperstein and Associates is that if he cannot properly train his employees to act professional then he should get out of the business or he has some real problems with the people he hired who are inturn giving his so called firm a bad reputation. I HAVE COMMITTED NO CRIME despite what you write. In fact, you have committed a crime and it is called verbal harrassment. Paul Kuperstein is obviously operating a corrupt system - why else would he be mailing out documentation from an unknown address. I have been trained in the legal environment and not once have I ever heard a legit lawyer operate in this matter. I have said it before and will say it again, this a boggus, scamming operation going on. The compant feeds off threatening people into sending them money and then you never hear from them again. Guest, you are the one who doesn't understand. Stop preaching to me and move on. And to your comment to JJ, I would like to respond to that if I may. It is a pointless scam when in my situation I don't owe a cent (and I am sure there are others - probably the vast majority of who you harrass). As said in previous posts, you are the only one defending the boggus company and changing your name to give the impression there are others out there who agree with you doesn't fool anyone.

Guest · Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 2:14 pm Subject:

Intimidated, provide me with a case/file number and I'll explain to you and everyone else why Mr. David has been contacting you.

*Name:
*Email:
*Phone:
*Zip:
*Debt

	* denotes required field

Internet's first get-out-of-debt community - 136,000 members

Paul Kupferstein - Mr. David - EBSI- 900 Number Dialers

Members Area

Free Debt Counseling

Ask the community

Also See

Featured Discussions

Featured Articles

Recent Forum Discussions

Recent Blog Post