Internet's first get-out-of-debt community - 136,000 members

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:25 pm Subject:

C, was your comments directed towards us or the company in question?

If it was for us, didn't you see the post I made earlier where I copied and pasted the converstation I had with the FTC!! It was directly from the source so are you saying FTC is uneducated when it comes to fdcpa laws? Rolling Eyes

Funny how Charline did not respond to that post or perhaps its you all along, Charline?

Intimidated · Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:31 pm Subject:

Ofcourse they are one in the same.

Take your own advice "C", "Charline" or whoever you are and educate yourself because your bluff has been called and you have been exposed as truly not knowing what you preach - AND that is what is amusing!

MOVE ALONG!

Kudos to your postings Jedijeff13 and Sapphiredreams!

C · Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:55 pm Subject:

Hurray to all of you. I'm not hiding, I sign everything C - it's Charline.
I promise I won't ever post again, not as guest, not as C and not a me, Charline. You've all done much research, and that's a good thing. We should all know the real deal.
I wish you no ill will, I'm glad you owe no money, and I'm sorry you had trouble with Mr. David or whoever from the Law Office.
I came here to answer questions that you wanted had. Sorry, I've obviously not said what you're looking for. I've been truthful, and respectful.
You've been provided the necessary information to contact me personally so I could review your file in an attempt to resolve your concern. No calls, not one.
Speak amongst yourselves, and make the best you can of a bad situation. This forum is about helping each other which is what I've tried to do.

Follow your dreams - I'm not the evil person you've decided I am.

Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:22 am Subject:

While many may be calling for your head, Charline, I have said kind things about you and your offers for assistance. My only issue with you is your statements that we amuze you and the we should learn the laws. Other than that, I say thank you for your offers to assist anyone that calls you. I think most of us on here haven't called because we have no reason to - we know what debts we have, and we know that your company does not have an honest file on any of us.

All I have done is post the laws. And the fact is that the company you work for has numerous people that have not abided by them. No one that has a file in your office is attempting to get out of their debt. I think myself, Intimidated and others have a big issue with how they were treated, and also with the fact that any debt "turned over" to your office is non-existant. It is well documented that Mr. Kupferstein and Liability Solutions purchases write off debt with an attempt to collect. The debt is written off for a reason, and 99% of the time, that is because the original debt was a fraud. Those debts were excused, but your company purchased proof of these debts and attempted to collect. Many people fell into the trap of the scam, and paid out monies they did not owe. It was others, like us, that asked questions and determined the true intent of Mr. David, Mr. Savage and others. And knowing what we know of the illegal activities of the afore mentioned lawyers, we are here to inform people of their rights.

I have paid many a debt. I have gone through a time in my life when money was very tight and I had a few collection agencies calling me. Many were very nice, informed me of what was due, for whom, and worked with me on a payment plan. They are a credit to the industry and an absolute dream to work with. And I told them so.

Your company does not fall into that category. Maybe if you got my file, it would have been different (and I would have double-paid a bill). But now I know the truth, and so willl everyone else.

Intimidated · Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:08 am Subject:

Well written Jedijeff13 - I second and agree with everything you wrote.

Great job on group efforts here on this forum with researching and posting all information found so that everyone knows the truth and their rights.

Jedijeff13, JJ, Sapphiredreams, Guest, Guest8 you are a valuable asset to this forum - keep up the great work!

Goodbye Charline, good luck. Hopefully if you last working with a company like Paul Kuperstein's you can set this company straight once and for all.

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:46 pm Subject:

spam message deleted

FrankyJD · Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:09 pm Subject:

EM and FG are connected somehow with the scam. I have recently been contacted by a "Mr David" from the Law Office of Paul Kupferstein . . . he claims I owe some company i have never heard of $1000+ . . . however he refuses to send me documentation validating the debt, alleging that he is not "required" to. No legitimate law firm would fail to do such, and sue someone instead, esp if the law firm is in Canada and the suit is to be filed in the States. . . the costs of such a suit would be much much more than the effort and expenses it would take to merely send someone proof of the alleged debt. IT IS A SCAM.

Charline · Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:16 am Subject:

FrankyJD, please contact me at 905-474-3535 ext. 513 so that I may assist you with this matter.
Charline

moosecammello

I received a voicemail(which I have saved)on my work phone number on June 15, 2006. A Mr. Sargeant indicated to me that there was a pending lawsuit against me and requested me to call 905-474-3535 immediately to resolve this urgent matter. The call just did not seem right, so I figured I would pull some information on this so-called lawfirm from the internet when I got home. I am very glad I did, thanks to all of you that have encountered this 'lawfirm'. I have tried to call the RCMP Phonebusters, but they are closed for the day. I will call tomorrow to report these guys.
Thanks!

Giddy UP!! · Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:17 pm Subject: Dear " Mr. Sargeant"

You are very unprofessional especially when you are asked to provide backup of your 'claim', there was no need to yell and carry on the way you did! Oh and BTW: 'In Alberta, Canada, the time available to sue is set out in the Limitations Act. Generally speaking, individuals and companies have two years to file a lawsuit from the date they ought to have known they had potential for a lawsuit.' To all of you that have had harrassment from this Jack *ss, lets get this guy stopped! Enough is enough!

Charline · Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:39 am Subject:

(x) pursue a non‑judgment debt where the last payment or written acknowledgement by the debtor is more than 6 years previous;
This clause is from the government of Alberta website, under Acts and Regulations section 12, subsection (x).
Contact me if you require assistance.
Charline 905-474-3535 ext. 513

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:34 am Subject:

Charline - could you please post a link to that? Because when I go to the Alberta gov't website, the closest I seem to find that fits your company's activities is this:

http://www.qp.gov.ab.ca/documents/regs/1999_194.cfm

And there is no subsection (x) under 12. I must be looking in the wrong spot, so if you could help me out, I would really appreciate it.

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:39 am Subject:

Also - I thought you guys were based in Markham, Ont. Your phone number verifies that. How does a law from the province of Alberta apply to your company?

Giddy UP!! · Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:05 am Subject:

Thanks jedijeff13 for the link! It appears as though Paul Kupferstein and ASS. is in default of a lot of the (Section 12)'Prohibited Practices,Prohibited practices for collection agencies' in the ALBERTA REGULATION 194/99 Fair Trading Act - COLLECTION AND DEBT REPAYMENT PRACTICES REGULATION. Charline, perhaps you should read the entire act as Mr. Sargeant apparently has not!! Also, the section of: Accounting 23.2(1) A collection agency must provide the debtor on request with a complete accounting of all the details of the debt and, if such an accounting is not in the possession of the collection agency, the agency must request that the creditor provide it. Please inform Mr. Sargeant that if he wants me to pay, then he is going to have to provide me with a paper copy of the backup of his so-called 'pending claim'! Also, I would like to see a copy of your Collection Agency license!!

Giddy UP!! · Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:29 am Subject:

Oh, and BTW 'Charline', I do not require any of your kind of "assistance" especially when you work for that so-called lawfirm! Thanks anyways!! Perhaps you should move to Alberta, there is no end to the jobs out here, I am sure you could work for a more reputable employer...

Charline · Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:15 pm Subject:

JediJeff13, I called the Alberta Government and they walked me through the website to find this information. I will find the site and post the walk through for you.
Giddy UP!!, I'm not the person you should be angry with.

*Name:
*Email:
*Phone:
*Zip:
*Debt

	* denotes required field

Internet's first get-out-of-debt community - 136,000 members

Paul Kupferstein - Mr. David - EBSI- 900 Number Dialers

Members Area

Free Debt Counseling

Ask the community

Also See

Featured Discussions

Featured Articles

Recent Forum Discussions

Recent Blog Post