Internet's first get-out-of-debt community - 136,000 members

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:18 pm Subject:

I second that. Enough of the name calling.

Question, Charline: if you know who Intimidated is, why has your company not contacted him? And granted, you have no clue who I am, but why when I stated to Mr. David that I had a feeling his attempts at collection were a scam, he stopped calling? Again - a $2000 debt. I know I wouldn't just write something off like that. Hell - I'm still trying to collect over 2 grand in back pay from a company that went backrupt. But my $2000 debt......just dust in the wind the moment I starting pushing back.

So maybe Mr. Kupfer.....er.....Mr. David should go through his old records and give me another call. It's been months and I miss him so. And if he could have proof of the debt ready to fax me, that would be great.

Thanks! See ya at TGIFridays.

Charline · Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:10 pm Subject:

Now we have an internal issue on our hands. Mr. David indeed. You know who you're dealing with and they won't sit pretty!
FYI - 'Yall' is not a word.
In case you're all wondering...Mr. David and Charliine are the same person. (please note the way Charliine is spelt - two i's - you are very clever)
We have never, not even once purchased any debt files.
Jedijeff13, it was very easy for me to determine who Intimidated was. If you read back through the posts (she or he) gives some very specific information. The reason we are not longer able to contact Intimidated is written for all to see.
I have no idea why Mr. David has not contacted you again. Why don't you call him yourself and ask? Like I've said many times, call me and I'll be more than happy to validate your debt.
Hey JJ, are you able to track IP addresses, we may very well have a law suit on our hands...

Mr. David · Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:07 am Subject:

So Charline, can you explain this article? .... http: //www . click2houston.com/news/5428045/detail. html

How the hell do you expect people to take you seriously with publicized crap like this?

Char · Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 1:21 pm Subject:

You are clearly a lier, and I couldn't have said it better myself -'publicized crap!'

Roberto · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:32 am Subject:

HAHAHA. Nice one. Yeah Charlene, I'd love to hear this explanation.

Intimidated · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 6:37 am Subject:

Do as you wish Charline - sink a little lower!

Your threats mean nothing to me AND you do not have anything on me.

Try posting any wrong info or slandering me in any way. I have now hired a lawyer and are sitting pretty just waiting for you to screw up so my lawyer can serve you LEGALLY with a legit law suit - that is a law suit that will stick unlike what you and your office does. It would give my nothing but pleasure to take money (via a winning law suit) from a company that tries to take others money illegitimately.

You have absolutely NO idea who I am despite what you might think or unprofessionally write.

Once again, I thought you were never going to post here again - another idle comment of yours.

Never did answer my questions/comments from my last post - what else is new - apparently nothing in the world of Kuperstein & Associates.

Intimidated · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:30 am Subject:

By the way (because I as well as others would like to know), here is my last posting for you to response to.

If a file is handed over, then Kuperstein should have all the same documentation that eWallet Express has.

What are you trying to say Charline, that Ewallet said "hey, we'd like to hire you, here is a phone number, name, amount - now collect" but that they didn't provide you with any other particulars. Give me a break!

If you were hired by eWallet to collect the money and that you request the money be sent to you, then you should be one the one sending out debt validation. The company hired you, doesn't that mean you are the one in charge of this file now - why do you need to contact them back to authorize them to send out validation. Why on earth would a company hire you when in the end you are dumping the responsibility back on them to send out validation. They could have done that in the first place themselves and not needed you. They hired you to take charge of this account now take charge and send him validation or is it that this is another boggus scam out of this so called law firm.

How do you jump from $330.00 to $2000.00 - this one definately has SCAM written all over it. How do you explain the difference of amount Charline or are you going to come back with the same old comment "contact our office with your case number". I don't expect you to trying and justify this with an intelligent straight forward comment - you'll just beat around the bush again.

Don't do anything jockman811 until KUPERSTEIN sends you validation because they were the ones hired to collect, they should be the ones sending you validation - plain and simple.

Charline · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:31 am Subject:

Relax Darling, no one knows who you are. I've not threatened you in any way - to share a situation without disclosing any confidential information is not illegal.
-happy to be everyones punching bag!

Guest · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:44 am Subject:

Oh but I (as well as this entire forum) recall you saying you did know who I was - back tracking are we?!

I suppose it would be much easier for you to disclose something if you were hiding your identity but unfortunately for you, you have indicated who you are over and over again on this forum - so know you will be under close scrutiny that if you try to slander me in any way with your false and untrue comments, you will face legal action. If you truly knew who I was was then you would know whether or not I was a "he or she".

I have nothing to hide but apparently you are back peddling now.

Are you going to answer the questions to my last post or continue avoiding them?!

Intimidated · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:46 am Subject:

I forgot to place my name in the last posting for anyone wondering who wrote it - Intimidated.

Charline · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:14 am Subject:

I'm not back peddling - you don't want me to know who you are, so I'll say I don't know who you are. Yes, I am going to avoid answering your questions to your last post because your case has absolutely nothing to do with eWallet, and besides I've already answered that question. You keep wanting to hear something that just isn't there.
I'm tired of playing games.

Guest · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:34 pm Subject:

You don't know who I am so once and for all give it up with pretending you do to intimidate people that your firm has some clue as to how to operate a legit firm legally.

No you have not answered the questions I brought up in support of jockman811. This is a free speaking site so if I wish to touch base on any topic here whether it relates/is addressed to me or not, I will do such so that it brings out the truth for the people asking the questions. You see Charline, all of us here are here to help one another unlike yourself who seems to avoid questions brought up.

My case has nothing to do with anything regarding your firm because I don't have a case - end of story.

Intimidated · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 12:36 pm Subject:

No matter how you explain it, you are back peddling or is is called damage control?!

Guest 1 · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:28 pm Subject:

I am having trouble getting on to the link addressed in the previous page - does anyone have any suggestions on how to retrieve it or can someone give a brief overview of what it says? Thanks.

Guest 2 · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:32 pm Subject:

Here you go Guest 1.

Telemarketing Scam Uses Bad Credit To Snag Victims
File Complaints With Better Business Bureau

POSTED: 1:51 pm CST November 29, 2005
UPDATED: 5:10 pm CST November 29, 2005

HOUSTON -- An urgent phone call demanding that you pay off a bad debt may end up costing you more than you bargained for, the KPRC Local 2 Troubleshooters reported Tuesday.

"It can be very intimidating," Blake House said.

"This is Mr. David calling from the Attorneys Office of Paul Kupferstein & Associates. I am calling regarding an urgent legal matter," a phone message to House said.

House received a letter from the same law firm in Canada. The important legal matter was an alleged unpaid bill for $102.

"I just didn't feel that I owed this and I needed somebody to show me that I did. And they couldn't," House said.

John Owens, with the Texas Attorney General's Consumer Division, said Canadian scams targeting U.S. residents are on the rise.

"There's a lot of corrupt telemarketing going on in Canada, I hate to say," Owens said.

In this case, the Troubleshooters discovered the law firm of Paul Kupferstein is not even registered to collect debt in Texas. Every bill collector calling Texas consumers must be licensed and bonded, and with the Secretary of State.

The Canadian collector refused to talk about it.

"We represent about 60 different clients, so there's nothing I need to speak to you about at this time," a representative said over the phone.

House filed a complaint with the Better Business Bureau and never heard from the company again.

But others are still receiving harassing letters and phone calls, according to the Troubleshooters.

"Contest the debt in writing and send it certified mail," Owens said.

If that does not work, House said to try his tactic.

"I'll hang up on him," he said.

Mr. David · Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:53 pm Subject:

Charlene, still eagerly awaiting a response from the above article. Again, how the hell do you expect people to take you or your company seriously with this crap?

*Name:
*Email:
*Phone:
*Zip:
*Debt

	* denotes required field

Internet's first get-out-of-debt community - 136,000 members

Paul Kupferstein - Mr. David - EBSI- 900 Number Dialers

Members Area

Free Debt Counseling

Ask the community

Also See

Featured Discussions

Featured Articles

Recent Forum Discussions

Recent Blog Post