Navigation

SOL on Credit Card debt in California

Message Author
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:20 pm Subject: SOL on Credit Card debt in California

My husband was a partner in a business that was disolved in 1999. The business American Express credit card account was opened with him signing the application as guaranter (spelling?). When he left the partnership, he notified, in writting, all company cards that were in his name that he would no longer accept responsibility and a request to close the account. At that time (about March 1999) The debt was about 1500.00. The remaining partner accepted responsibility of the debt since he would retain the assets that were purchased. A few years later, when we applied for a home loan, we find that not only did American Express not close the account, but another 2700.00 (approx)was charged and the expartner did not make the payments (nor can we find the expartner now). The credit report states the date of last activity to be 6/1999. He disputed the validity of the debt, but since American Express charged it off and the rest of his credit is impeccable and it did not stop us from getting a loan, he did not pursue the matter further. Now, 2005, we are getting a collection letter from Capital Management Service, Inc. trying to collect the debt on behalf of Gulfstate Credit, neither of which my husband ever entered into an agreement with. What is the SOL on a situation like this (we live in California, always have) and, if some of the purchases charged on this card were made from companies outside of California, does the California SOL still apply? or would it be in the state where the company is that the purchase was made from? We have requested a copy of the charges, but we have never received a reply from American Express. We have no intention of paying this debt. What recourse can we expect that they may take against us? Thanks, Tigger
_________________
tiggertales
tiggertales



Leave a quick message for tiggertales
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 3
Debtcc Points: 150

PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:57 pm Subject:

Tiggertales

When a business is dissolved, all the paperwork is required to be submitted with the financial institutions so that they are notified about the situation. It seems that the credit company was not informed about the business getting dissolved and that is the reason the debt has added up with interests in his account. Ask your husband to look out for the documents that can legally prove that the expartner is responsible for this debt. But chances are, the credit company will not find this defense to be a strong one because they should have been informed about it. And since the partner can't be found now, you are in their target.

Now, looking at the other side of the story is the fact that the date of last activity in this account is 6/1999. The statute of limitation in California is 4 years and this takes the debt out of the legal collection period.

It seems that Gulfstate Credit has been transferred this debt by American Express. As per the state laws, the SOL is calculated on the debt where it actually took place and the date of last activity on it.

Considering the fact that the debt is out of the SOL period, you can't be forced to pay it and can't be entered into a lawsuit. The SOL does not restrict the lender or the collection agency to attempt collections, but you can escape it legally if the debt is out of this period.

Make your side stronger by sending letters to the company and request for information. Send your letters certified with return receipt requested. You will be documenting everything for your future use if it takes a legal turn. Please keep us informed on this matter.

ben

ben

Leave a quick message for ben
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 2095
Debtcc Points: 41174

PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:20 pm Subject:

Thanks. Since he is out of the SOL period, then I assume a letter to the collection agency disputing the debt and bringing to their attention that the SOL period has been exceed should suffice? Otherwise, we have not received any phone calls at all and I am completly okay with just trashing their written correspondence now that I know they can't sue us.
Regarding bounced checks....the ex partner also wrote and a bad check, but it was done one day before my husband file the papers. Since it was my husbands SS#, they have reported it on his credit report. However, no one has taken any action to collect on this bounced check. The check was a NSF March 1999. Is there an SOL on bad checks? And can it be removed from the credit report after 7 years as is the case with credit card debt?
Thanks, this is a great site....I have learned a lot!

_________________
tiggertales
tiggertales



Leave a quick message for tiggertales
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 3
Debtcc Points: 150

PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:46 pm Subject:

Writing a bad check is not good because it has lots of unpleasant consequences in the future. I will write them here in my next post. Please do have a look later.

However, now the point we are discussing is whether there are any state laws for writing checks. You need to check the state laws for this purpose. Some states have a specific statute to rule over the uniform commercial code. A check is a negotiable instrument and governed by the uniform commercial code. To have the bottom line idea, you should check the state laws and the uniform commercial code and the SOL for collection on checks.

ben

ben

Leave a quick message for ben
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 2095
Debtcc Points: 41174

PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:51 pm Subject:

Even if the check was written and signed by the other partner? Does that still make my husband resonsible because it was his SS# on the bank account? (The partner was named on the checking account and thus had authority to sign checks. The bank account was under the Business name).
Thanks,

_________________
tiggertales
tiggertales



Leave a quick message for tiggertales
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 3
Debtcc Points: 150

PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 5:58 pm Subject:

Since the partner was given the authority, he wrote the check. Since your husband’s SSN# is appearing in the bank account, it perhaps, makes him responsible.

But the eventual fact is that the debt is out of the SOL period. So, there is something less to worry on it.

ben

ben

Leave a quick message for ben
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 2095
Debtcc Points: 41174

Quick Reply
Your Name (optional)
Subject (optional)
Message
All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Espanol | RSS Feeds| Terms of Services Navigation