Ok, it's an internet based check cashing service. Did you happen to notice in the online contract that they say that the law of Grenada applies; that you agree to arbitration no matter what; and that the apr on the loan is almost 500%?
How about this: a whois search using Registration Technologies' website indicates that the owner of "mycashnow.com" and "mycashnow.net" is:
Unlisted-Whois.com Protection Service
P.O. Box 229
Margaretville, NY 12455
US
Clearly a third party designed to keep you from knowing who's really behind that website. However, "mycashnow.org" (which has no website)is owned by:
Registrant Organization:mycashnow.com Inc.
Registrant Street1:Grand Anse
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:St. George's
Registrant State/Province:N/A
Registrant Postal Code:00000
Registrant Country:GD
(thanks to registrationtek.com for the data)
I suspect that whoever's behind mycashnow has "mycashnow.org" registered as a screen, so that people who attempt legal recourse against them will assume that they have to serve someone in St. George's, GD.
Here's the arbitration agreement you agreed to:
AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE DISPUTES. All disputes and controversies of every kind and nature between the parties hereto arising out of or in connection with this agreement as to the existence, construction, validity,interpretation or meaning, performance, nonperformance, enforcement, operation, breach, continuance, or termination therefore, as well as whether the controversy or dispute is subject to arbitration, and the amount of any loss or damage, shall be submitted to arbitration in a jurisdiction to be chosen by Mycashnow.comTM Inc. before three arbitrators appointed by the American Arbitration Association pursuant to the commercial rules of the American Arbitration Association in effect at the time any arbitration proceeding is commenced, which rules are hereby incorporated by reference thereto and made a part of this agreement. The foregoing notwithstanding, the company retains the authority to institute an action in any court to recover sums due company by customer hereunder. The arbitration award shall be final and binding upon both parties and judgement upon such arbitration award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The parties specifically state their understanding that the check casher cannot be sued in any court or any controversy or dispute. In the event this provision or any part thereof is held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining terms and conditions of this agreement shall not be effected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect.
I'd say that, as a purely technical legal matter, although not knowing what the laws of Granada would do or whether there is a usury defense or any other defense, they've got you well over a barrel.
There may be some ways out of it, however, as a strategic matter. Remember the legal system is confrontational in nature. Takes two to tango. The first thing I would do is find out whether the state you live in has what in Virginia is called a "home solicitation sales act". The mycashnow contract is probably voidable under Virginia law, and would provide for an award of damages to the consumer. Chances are there's some way to cancel the contract under state law. That doesn't mean "terminate" because that would imply that there was a contract to begin with. "Voidable" and "cancel" mean, like, there never was a contract, why? because you as the consumer take whatever legal steps are required under the laws of your state to "avoid" or "cancel" the contract. If there never was a contract, then you're not bound to the choice of law provision, although the arbitration clause may survive. There are federal cases that say that arbitration clauses stand alone and whether or not the rest of the contract is void, the arbitration clause survives. Those decisions rest on a principle of "mutual promises" as consideration for the limited contract to arbitrate claims. My reading of this arbitration clause suggests that that analysis would not prevail here because the contract is clearly not mutual. They reserve the right to sue you in court, and to pick the arbitrators and to choose the jurisdiction in which arbitration is to occur - there's no way for you to go to arbitration without sending them a demand for arbitration and waiting for them to pick the judges. No mutuality, no contract. (At least that's what I'd argue.)
Here's another thing: if you can't find out who they really are and where they really are, you can't get service of process on them very well. Their idea is clearly that they can avoid the consequences of litigation if they hide effectively. Not true. In the U.S., you can get service on them by serving them at their last known address, subject to some limitations. The only address I can find for them is the "St. George's" thing, which is probably bogus. Nevertheless, that's the address they gave, so you can have them served there via the secretary of state or clerk of the corporation commission, or whatever the office is called in your state. File suit against them in the lower level trial court (go to your county courthouse and find the office of the clerk of court, civil division, in the lower level trial court and ask them what you need to fill out to file suit and how much it will cost).
A wrinkle on service of process: you have to jump through a few extra hoops to get service of process in Grenada. Grenada is not a member state of the Hague Convention on Service of Process, but is a party to the international agreement abolishing the requirement that the papers be domesticated in Grenada. That means it's simpler to get service of process there than it would be to get it in, say, Germany. You could, alternatively, get service on the anonymous domain registration folks in N.Y., on the theory that they're the only agent you can find in the U.S. for mycashnow. Not sure how that would hold up if it were contested.
My goal if I were you, would be to get a declaratory judgment order from a local court to the effect that you don't owe mycashnow any money. If mycashnow wants to contest it, they can come in and yell "arbitration" and "grenada law" if they want to, but my guess is that they won't show up, especially if you're not asking for damages from them, only an order confirming that you've already paid in full. That way, you'll have something you can send to the credit bureaus to show (1) that the matter has been litigated and resolved in your favor; and (2) it precludes them from coming into court later and suing you for the deficiency on the theory of "res judicata" ("something already decided").
I suggest that you bite the bullet and find a lawyer in your county who can understand this strategy, most "pedestrian" lawyers won't. Pay that person some money to get the declaratory judgment for you, to make sure it's done right (and therefore unassailable later). You may be able to get a judgment on your own, but you may do something wrong, and if an order is entered on the basis of what you did wrong, that order can be vacated later.
Note of general importance to all: please, please, please read the contract before you sign up. The reason people use contracts is so that, when things don't work out as everyone might wish, there will be evidence that can be used in court (or arbitration) as to what the parties intended. Let me say that another way: the purpose of the contract is to make sure that the consumer is well and truly screwed if, as, and when, the creditor feels like applying the screwdriver. Don't sign up to something you won't really be able to live with. If that means you can't get a credit card or quick payment on your check, then live with that. You'll be better off.