"Much different" doesnt even come close to just how different these idiots are. First of all, Banks are heavily heavily regulated and under a constant microscope. I would think by now, they have figured exactly to a science just what is involved and what is compliant, enforceable and indeed legal in order to issue a loan. Dont get me wrong, I know not all banks are fully compliant and I do completely support the validation process which is what NFDRS claims "their attorneys" argue on your behalf. First of all, there is a thing called "unauthorized practice of law" which is a very serious offense for attorneys who represent clients beyond their jurisdiction or where they are not licensed. So, giving the benefit of the doubt, lets say they have counsel in Ca. They can only represent Ca. clients. Do you live in Ca? Probably not. So, everyone else who signs up with FDRS is being sold on the fact that their "attorneys" are challenging the validity of the debt. A little inside information for the naive...this is a process that is not new by any means. Any debtor represented by an attorney will request from the plaintiff attorney proof of the alleged debt. This is called "validation of debt". An attorney will a) confirm that there is a debt but will use this tool in order to find a loop hole or non-compliance to get out of a debt. Therefore, NDRS is offering a program that enables people to commit fraud by way of a 3rd party but advocates not paying your bills which to me is the same as stealing no?
If a debt is not valid, by all means dispute it til its gone but if it is owed it is your responsibility to fulfill your obligation according to the contract you signed or by renegotiating a contract by means of debt settlement or reduction to interest or principal based on your extenuating circumstance.
There are a few (very few) innovative styles some uses to settle debt. FDRS advocates thievery, dishonesty and fraud. If you enroll with them, rest assured you will not benefit. Although "debt validation" is your legal tool as a debtor, there are many creditors who see this type of dispute as a refusal to pay resulting in an immediate lawsuit ending your bankruptcy alternative program.
Knowing this, reading how they are responsive still to sales calls, and not at all responsive to active clients inquiries tells me they are only out to take your money and accomplish nothing for you.
Good luck if you choose that route.