Bull D, I appreciate that someone took the time to set up this forum. My hat is off to them, with much appreciation, whoever they may be.
All I'm asking is for wolf to let you (and me) know what was deleted. I mean, it must have been VERY bad for him to delete my post. Either that or have him let us know he posted using my login. This speaks to the integrity of this board.
I am NOT making a personal attack here, but I am posting an opinion when I say that your last post skirts the topic of my post you are claiming to answer.
You say: "Willy when you run a board,perhaps you can dictate how it is run. This forum has a zero tolerance policy on personal comments." I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and substitute "attacks" for "comments" (otherwise, if personal comments were not allowed, there would be no forum).
I don't want to run a board.
What I've been asking is for you moderators to PLEASE please please point out one or more of my "personal attacks". This will allow me to know what can and cannot be posted.
And if/when you find one, please point out how that "attack" is any different from what others (unmolested by and often including moderators) have said about me.
I understand that this is a private forum and I don't expect freedom of speech. But
is it too much to ask an answer to this question?
As far as the "Terms of usage and conditions of service"
http://www.debtconsolidationcare.com/tos.html , I am VERY glad you pointed me in that direction, as it seems that many people have not been there yet.
For instance, mobile has violated Rule #4 MANY times: "Do not post extract from any press release, email, newsletter, web page in the forum instead you can give an inactive link. Links to government, law and other informative and relevant sites can be kept active. Direct or whispering promotional posts will be deleted without any notice."
Not a word from the moderators. A synopsis with a link would more likely be read by anyone who cares.
I am being charged with Rule #11: "Please do not make any personal attacks to any individuals in the forum." Yet you moderators have not pointed out what personal attacks have been made by me. How can I not make a personal attack if I don't know what you moderators consider a personal attack?
Of a related matter, does my stating that mobile is in violation of rule #4 constitute a personal attack?
Will this post see the light of day or will it be "edited"?