ripped off by jackson crowder law firm

You know, I am finally moving forward again. I called my Congressman and he told me what i needed to do for free. I followed his instructions and I saved my house. Of course this was while a company named Meltzer Law was instructing me that they were in touch with my mortgage company while taking $250 a week from me for 8 weeks. However they were never in touch with my mortgage company and when the FTC shut them down and the timing was terrible because I had just paid my last payment to them and they had just instructed me to not contact my mortgage company and that they would contact me within the next few months to let me know what was up and not to call them they would call me. So my debt grew and I was only informed by a local lawyer who was contracted out by them after his checks started bouncing and they weren't returning his calls that they had been shut down by the FTC. The FTC is not in the business of shutting down companies randomly. My point is this, they were screwing people when they were at their lowest points and when they knew they couldn't fight back. They ruined lives and families, sure they didn't create the problem but they drove the final nails in the coffin after stealing the rings and watches as it were. I personally no longer am trying to hunt down and expose them, but as I hear more about what is happening to them I am thrilled to see them twist in the wind. They are lawyers, they worked hard to get where they are and deserve the good life, but when they take the last dollar from the hands of those at the very bottom of the dogpile they get what they deserve.

THEY ARE ALL SCIENTOLOGIST IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE SCIENTOLOGIST IN LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA. STAY CLEAR OF THIS CULT THE ARE ANTI-GOD AND WILL LIE AND DO ANYTHING FOR A BUCK.

Loislaw Federal District Court Opinions
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. WASHINGTON DATA RESOURCES (M.D.Fla. 3-25-2011)
CASE NO.: 8:09-cv-2309-T-23TBM.
March 25, 2011

The Federal Trade Commission (the "Commission") sues (Doc. 1) and alleges a violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (the "FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 45(a), [fn1] and a violation of the Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 C.F.R. §§ 310.1-310.9 (the "TSR").[fn2] The Commission seeks disgorgement and a permanent injunction. The pro se defendant Tyna Caldwell moves (Docs. 222, 26 for summary judgment. The defendant Richard Bishop moves (Doc. 234) for summary judgment, and the pro se defendants Brent McDaniel and Douglas Crowder join (Docs. 225, 226) Bishop's motion.[fn3] The Commission responds (Docs. 248, 252) in opposition.