My post wasnt that long, how could you have missed me saying that was a possibility not once, but twice?
The ligation rate is no different than any other company. One of my jobs as a collector was to verify the suitworthiness of files. There are coded internal collections scores which express the priority of a debtor to be sued. The vast majority of people were not to be sued unless we could find that they had property which did not have a judgment or lien against it.
Banks typically have their own rules for us, like dont sue anything under $1500, and they only approve litigation in batches. It doesnt make sense for them to sue everyone, they would have to pay the lawyer's out of their own pocket and then wait until people could pay or had jobs. They then have to find out the people had jobs, and hire us again to garnish them.
Banks are not any more zealous than any other company when it comes to any general dollar amount.
Any company that handles debts above $1500 is going to have an above average litigation rate. This is because the average litigation rate is reduced massively by the companies that have a million $300 accounts they never sue.
For someone to have an accurate view of average litigation rates, they would have to reduce the standard deviation of the sample group to avoid the smallest and largest accounts.