| Message |
Author |
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 3:57 am |
|
|
As per the IRS article, I can claim a deduction for destroyed, damaged or stolen property that happens due to casualty or theft.
Now can anyone explain the paragraph below?
| Quote: | | If your property is covered by insurance, file a timely insurance claim for reimbursement of the loss. Otherwise you cannot deduct this loss as a casualty or theft. This does not apply to the portion of the loss not covered by insurance. |
I thought it would be the opposite than what is stated here.
_________________ Read my thoughts about Debt and Credit.
|
|
stanley
Moderator

Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 1716
Debtcc Points: 251
|
|
|
|
cajunbulldog
Moderator

Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 4769
Debtcc Points: 34560
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:51 am |
|
|
Thanks for helping me understand this cajunbulldog.
So the portion of loss that is not covered in the insurance is tax deductible right? But the quoted text in my first post is saying something different or it's me who does not understand it correctly.
_________________ Read my thoughts about Debt and Credit.
|
|
stanley
Moderator

Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 1716
Debtcc Points: 251
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:12 am |
|
|
There's two sentences. The first sounds like it is saying if you have insurance but don't file a claim, then you can't claim your loss as a deduction. However, if you do file a claim, then you can deduct your net loss (total loss less insurance proceeds).
|
|
DebtCruncher
Moderator

Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1332
Debtcc Points: 15942
|
|
|