Skip to main content
index page

Debt Validation Followup

Submitted by on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 09:59
Posts: 202330
Credits:
[Donate]

I have asked Asset Acceptance (via certified letter) to prove that I owe a debt that they claim that I owe and they have not been able to prove anything. I’m at a roadblock I’m not sure what to do next. I’ve given them a 30 day deadline to provide proof. How do I get this off of my credit report? I’ve been searching your templates for an idea the last letter I used was from your website which has been SO helpful!!!! But I’m stuck. How do I get these people to go away for good this time! They haven’t a leg to stand on! I guess I need the legal words to get them off my back! Help!! Please!!


This sample letter was in the do it yourself section of this community.

If your collection agency fails to send you an adequate proof of your legal obligation to pay a debt, then you might write them a letter.
Quote:


Company:
Address:

Date:

Re: Account no

Dear Sir/Madam,

This letter is to dispute the account referred to above. There is a serious misunderstanding with the collection agency. While you are able to verify my debt, no number of requests or in-personal contacts with the agency could get them validate the same. This is really strange! The debt is not mine.

According to FCRA you are required to verify the validity within 30 days. It also states that if you cannot do the same the disputed item should be deleted from my credit report in right earnest. The debt was not verified accurately. I will be forced to take legal action if you do not comply with the law. You will be forced to pay damages and declaratory relief under the norms.

I am not in favor of the litigation process to get my redress, but nonetheless I would have to sue just the same.

I am enclosing herewith the copies of my request for validation to the collecting agency and the receipts with my signature. I hope this matter is resolved without further hassles
Thanks,
Sincerely,


Your Signature
Your Name
Your Address


Submitted by Shazzers on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 11:40

Shazzers

( Posts: 17344 | Credits: )


I was under the impression that you, as a consumer, had 30 days to respond when you get their letter to dispute the debt. And that, the Ca had no time limit to respond, unless you live in Texas, and I believe there may be a few other states as well.

When I have sent a follow-up letter, I included a copy of my first one,along with an "I am still waiting for the complete info to be sent", and the last time, mentioned that they had been contacting me before validating, as well as giving my info to someone else..Good Luck

I may be wrong on this, if so, someone will come along and help!!..karen


Submitted by Bossy4455 on Tue, 08/26/2008 - 07:17

Bossy4455

( Posts: 5854 | Credits: )


This was the letter that I sent. Should I follow up with a different one stating that their time is up they couldn't validate therefore it should be removed immediatly from my credit report. I know what I want to say but maybe a more "legal" way to put it to get them to take it off or I will pursue. . . that sort of thing

Thanks


Submitted by on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 10:05

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Quote:

who exactly would the above letter be sent to? It refers to the collection agency as being another entity ... isn't a letter like that sent TO the collection agency? I am super confused!


Hummmmmmm, I was thinking that letter would be more geared toward the CRA to get the CA removed from your credit report. :?


Submitted by Shazzers on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 10:34

Shazzers

( Posts: 17344 | Credits: )


So now what? I wait? The one thing they did say is that this was a debt about 13 years old. I know the SOL in TX is 4 years. So if this is that old they shouldn't even be reporting at all right! I just need this to go away already. I don't even know who this debitor is anyway. I think they are crazy.


Submitted by on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 10:55

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


If it is 13 years old it should not be on your credit report. I would dispute it with each one if it is on there. You will have to wait for their response and then pull a new report. If it shows up again then the CA violated the FCRA and you could sue and win. While you are disputing with them I would also send another DV letter to the CA with a full Cease Comm attached.


Submitted by DOLLARSandSINCE on Wed, 08/27/2008 - 11:20

DOLLARSandSINCE

( Posts: 1078 | Credits: )


OK, not to stir that pot any.

A few months back, when I was being sued by CA, I asked my attorney from Legal Aide exactly how long a CA had to respond to validation. She responded it was 30 days.

Now, I don't know if that's Florida thing or not, as I thought Texas was the only state that did set a time limit for CA's to respond. It does seem, though, there is a lot of confusion surrounding that 30 day window, with all parties involved.

Just thought I'd share.


Submitted by FloridaRon on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 02:15

FloridaRon

( Posts: 1190 | Credits: )


If it is 13 years old it should definately not be on your report, it could be a case of re-aging which is a big no-no. You mentioned TX SOL, does that mean you are a Texas resident? If so..then you actually are in a prettey good position, because according to TX law they HAVE to respond to any DV request within 30 days or they HAVE to remove it from the credit report, period. Furthermore, you could dispute with the CRAs while it is under DV and when they verify they have just violated even further and if you include the written notice in your letter, you could take them to court for thousands of dollars and win because you have them hands down. TX law is nice like that...


Submitted by goldenbast on Thu, 08/28/2008 - 09:28

goldenbast

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )


Sometimes I tend to write really fast and right in the reply block, not bothering with spell checking, especially if I am in a hurry. I figure no one will mind if I misspell something, like I spelled "prettey" wrong too. :) Besides, I have a tendency to get judged on things other then my spelling so I really don't care about the spelling, the message is the same, weather I type faster then I think or not. :)


Submitted by goldenbast on Wed, 09/10/2008 - 06:17

goldenbast

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )