Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Process serving never served papers

Date: Wed, 01/24/2007 - 07:50

Submitted by outlaw8117
on Wed, 01/24/2007 - 07:50

Posts: 164 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 23


Does anyone know the laws when it comes to serving someone court papers? My wages are being garnished but I was never served the papers. They just came by regular mail and I never saw a court date. So before I ask the collection agency for all the relevant paperwork, (because I'm going to make sure that they followed fdcpa laws) I am just curious what the process is.


Legal summons is served by the sheriff in your mailing address. You have to sign it after receiving the papers. Go to the court where the case is filed against you. Verify your info with the clerk because the collection agency must have filed a case and a hearing date is fixed. If there is no record, I doubt there is a case against you. I will only assume that the CA sent you fake legal papers and attempted to garnish your wages. First collect this info from the court and then move from there.


lrhall41

Submitted by mcranberra on Wed, 01/24/2007 - 09:43

( Posts: 524 | Credits: )


Well they already have the judgment because my wages are being garnished. I have the paperwork with the judges signature. I don't have any paperwork that shows a court date and time. Nor do I remember ever seeing that. I got that paperwork in the mail and it wasn't even certified mail at that. My question is what is the legal process? I am wondering if somehow they bypassed it to where I never got the summons to appear. The paperwork is in the courts, or at least it should be. I can't imagine a collection agency would commit that flagrant of a violation and come up with dummy court papers containing a judges signature. Shouldn't the collection agency be able to provide me with all of that paperwork when I request it? I want to check to make sure they followed the law and if not, then I will countersue.


lrhall41

Submitted by outlaw8117 on Wed, 01/24/2007 - 10:30

( Posts: 164 | Credits: )


Actually, it probably is perfectly legal...Your payroll dept would never honor a writ of garnishment that doesn't have a seal on it.

You don't always have to have the papers served to you. Having them sent by mail or just receiving a copy of the writ from your HR dept is perfectly legal..as long as the copy of the writ has a docket number on it. If a debt goes long enough unpaid, a creditor has the right to demand payment WITHOUT a civil lawsuit via wage garnishment.

If you have any questions about the legality of the garnishment, please feel free to pm me! I am HR, so that's one thing I can help with! :lol:


lrhall41

Submitted by finsfan13 on Wed, 01/24/2007 - 15:59

( Posts: 6919 | Credits: )


I knew they couldn't get the garnishment without a court order. What I didn't know, nor was I given the opportunity to show up in court as far as I can tell. I didn't see any of the court papers with a court date. Just the garnishment writ and the judges signature is all I have. I don't doubt the legitimacy of the garnishment, I wasn't sure of a court date if there ever was one and if I wasn't given a court date because I wasn't properly served, then I may contest that. If I even can fight that one.


lrhall41

Submitted by outlaw8117 on Thu, 01/25/2007 - 08:40

( Posts: 164 | Credits: )


texasconsumer- We were going through an auto accident claim at the time. Some dip was suing my son because he hit his hub cap, and the dip was on the wrong side of the road! Anyway, I called my attorney, and told him how this was served, he wanted all the info, but didn't seem too concerned on how it was served..KAren


lrhall41

Submitted by Bossy4455 on Thu, 01/25/2007 - 10:28

( Posts: 5854 | Credits: )


Mishele,

A creditor DOES always have to get a court order to garnish, but they don't always have to file suit. If they can prove negligence on your part then they can simply file for a garnishment without the hassle and extra expense of a civil suit. I think it does mainly happen when the debt is older, or if a person is blatantly avoiding contact. So it still is court-ordered, the debtor just isn't being sued.


lrhall41

Submitted by finsfan13 on Thu, 01/25/2007 - 11:24

( Posts: 6919 | Credits: )


So how would something like that show up on your credit report? Thanks for the info, fins. They can't garnish unemployment checks can they? I'm dealing with some seedy collection agencies right now while I'm trying to settle with the original creditors. The orginal creditors are cashing my checks and applying the amounts toward my accounts with them. I guess that is a positive factor for me.


lrhall41

Submitted by Cow & Chicken on Thu, 01/25/2007 - 14:29

( Posts: 3571 | Credits: )


Mishele,
it would show up on your credit report because it's still court-ordered. It's just the same as a judgement. I know that this doesn't happen everyday, but trust me, I have had a lot of employees crying because they had no idea this was coming..And in checking into it, I found this is what it was.

As far as unemployment, yes, they CAN be garnished, but not for consumer debts.


lrhall41

Submitted by finsfan13 on Thu, 01/25/2007 - 16:22

( Posts: 6919 | Credits: )


:) Just wanted to add my $.02. If they got the garnishment without a judgement showing you had a court ordered obligation to them,you can probably file a motion with court to drag them to a hearing. At hearing they would either show why they believe you owe money or the court can negate the garnishment order.

:twisted: Of course if you want to get nasty,prove to court they legally did not have right to garnish.After you do that move court to order that they pay back all that they have taken and that they be ordered to pay all legal and court costs.


lrhall41

Submitted by cajunbulldog on Fri, 01/26/2007 - 16:30

( Posts: 4850 | Credits: )