Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Dealing with Debt Collectors

Date: Sun, 01/28/2007 - 15:06

Submitted by kelly_irl
on Sun, 01/28/2007 - 15:06

Posts: 10 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 35


Well after taking a long hard look at my DH credit report we've decided to start paying off all his past debts. As he is set to deploy soon I have been given the task of doing all the administrative work I'm at a loss as to where to start. Some of his old accounts have been charged off and handed over to companies such as Asset Acceptance. Now my problem is I cannot seem to find matching amounts on the credit report, meaning debts that match the exact amount of the charged off card. I'm wondering if these debts being collected are valid debts at all. I don't know how to go about finding out if these debts are valid, and if so how do we go about negotiating with the debt collectors? We just want to clear his credit and start working on rebuilding it asap. If anyone has any ideas, sample letters or just general advice I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks!!!


The first thing you need to do is ask each collector to validate the debt, which means to ask them to provide you with documentation as to who the original creditor was, what the amount owed is, and so on. Send your letter to the collection agency by Certified Mail, with a Return Receipt Requested, so you have documentation proving that you made the request.

collection agencies will frequently fail, for whatever reason, to provide you with that documentation, which is fine, because if they don't, they're legally prohibited from collecting the debt. On the other hand, if they *do* validate, you'll obviously be better informed about the debt and be able to make a better decision about how to proceed for that reason.

debt validation typically takes several months when it happens at all, so in the interim, while you're waiting for validation, you might want to think about other things you need to handle, like drawing up a budget and disciplining yourself to stick to it.


lrhall41

Submitted by Debt Padawan on Sun, 01/28/2007 - 16:14

( Posts: 89 | Credits: )


No. For one thing, the agencies don't *want* to validate the debt because it's such a hassle, so if you fax or call them, they'll just start pressuring you to pay immediately. Also, once you've asked them to validate, they *can't* collect the debt until they've validated -- it's illegal.

Asking for validation benefits you. Either they won't validate, in which case they can't collect the debt, or they'll validate and you'll be able to get your accounts straightened out. Another benefit of asking for validation, as I said, is that it takes a few months, during which time you can start thinking about other things. For example, you need to be aware that paying off older bad debts can actually harm your credit rating and start figuring out ways to pay off the debt safely.


lrhall41

Submitted by Debt Padawan on Sun, 01/28/2007 - 17:32

( Posts: 89 | Credits: )


Ok thanks a million, I just took a look at our CR and I've noticed that there are only two collection agencies, the other two are charged off cards which have not yet been "sold" so we'll contact the creditors directly on those. I really appreciate your help, and plan on getting those letters off in the mail tomorrow :)


lrhall41

Submitted by kelly_irl on Sun, 01/28/2007 - 17:45

( Posts: 10 | Credits: )


I hope everything goes well. Working with the original creditor is usually better, by the way... working with a collection agency can be problematic because so many of them are so shady.

Please keep us informed... it sounds like your troubles are actually pretty minor compared to those that a lot of us have, so take heart -- it's probably not going to take much work on your part to get everything straightened out. Good luck. :)


lrhall41

Submitted by Debt Padawan on Sun, 01/28/2007 - 17:54

( Posts: 89 | Credits: )


They can collect on debt even if your request for validation. What they aren't supposed to do is collect on it before the first letter has been sent, and if it has been sent to an old address and not your current one as long as their system says it has been sent then they can collect.

Collection sgencies, most of them only report once or twice a year unless you are trying to dispute it by credit report then they will report again to counter your dispute. Credit Cards gain intrest even when charged off but it is a yearly intrest rate not a monthly.

The account numbers might not match to the CBR's because you are assigned a new account number usualy when you are placed in collections and they may or may not have the credit card number. It does depend on if the creditor allows them to have it or not. The creditor my company works with does not allow us to have the full CC#.

Also, since military members aren't supposed to be in debt I wouldn't go passing around number or web sites because you don't want that information to happen upon to a suerior officer who has it out for your spouse because that creates a whole new set of issues unless you are specificaly asked by someone.


lrhall41

Submitted by FYI on Wed, 01/31/2007 - 04:24

( Posts: 1950 | Credits: )


Quote:

Also, since military members aren't supposed to be in debt I wouldn't go passing around number or web sites because you don't want that information to happen upon to a suerior officer who has it out for your spouse because that creates a whole new set of issues unless you are specificaly asked by someone.


Being a former member of the U.S. Military all I can say to this last paragraph is WHAT???? What are you talking about? You may work in the collections industry but clearly you know nothing about the inner workings of the U.S. Military. I don't necessarily mean to be rude, but this borders on being completely asinine. Perhaps you should leave military matters to those of us that actually served.


lrhall41

Submitted by fjv4 on Wed, 01/31/2007 - 12:23

( Posts: 62 | Credits: )


Quote:

Also, since military members aren't supposed to be in debt I wouldn't go passing around number or web sites because you don't want that information to happen upon to a suerior officer who has it out for your spouse because that creates a whole new set of issues unless you are specificaly asked by someone.


Sorry, I shot right past this last part of your post FYI, eck. I sincerely hope than none of our service personell, spouses or family has had this happen to them. The following is from the US Code; Title 10; subtitle A; PART 2; Chapter 47; Sub-Chapter X (10) of the UCMJ

Link 1: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode10/usc_sup_01_10_10_A_20_II_30_47_40_X.html

Link 2:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00000921----000-.html

Link 3:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00000927----000-.html

Link 4:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00000933----000-.html

Link 5:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00000934----000-.html

Link 6:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode10/usc_sec_10_00000923---a000-.html

This only a minute portion of what an officer/enlisted could face within the military courts; later to be remanded to custody of the FBI or US Marshal & charged apropriately with additional violations of the related CFR's in civialian court of law.

Theoretically speaking......


lrhall41

Submitted by texasconsumeractivist on Wed, 01/31/2007 - 15:47

( Posts: 664 | Credits: )


FDCPA Section 809. Validation of debts

[quote][15 USC 1692g]
(b) If the consumer notifies the debt collector in writing within the thirty-day period described in subsection (a) that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, or that the consumer requests the name and address of the original creditor, the debt collector shall cease collection of the debt, or any disputed portion thereof, until the debt collector obtains verification of the debt or any copy of a judgment, or the name and address of the original creditor, and a copy of such verification or judgment, or name and address of the original creditor, is mailed to the consumer by the debt collector.
[/quote]
They do have to stop collection after a dv letter is sent by the consumer.


lrhall41

Submitted by Cow & Chicken on Wed, 01/31/2007 - 16:08

( Posts: 3571 | Credits: )


Thanks Mishele. There was some commenting made on FYI's last paragraph in her post. Myself, have no problem with her post overall. I researched the UCMJ as it relates to her last paragraph in an effort to suppliment it & hopefully clear up any misunderstanding. I hope it comes across in the way it is intended & not misconstrued as being disrespectful of FYI.

I'll feel pretty terrible if it does.

:(


lrhall41

Submitted by texasconsumeractivist on Wed, 01/31/2007 - 17:57

( Posts: 664 | Credits: )


I apologise if I was mistaken. I remeber a few years ago when my spouse was in the military sitting in one of the military's lawyers office over a certain problem and him telling us that there was supposed to be no unresolved debt on his part. So I was drawing my conclusion on previous experiences.

As for the DV letter thing, I was not thinking about the "within 30 days" period of the first letter because from most of the post here it deals with old debt where the first letter had already been sent and the first thirty days has already expired.


lrhall41

Submitted by FYI on Thu, 02/01/2007 - 04:01

( Posts: 1950 | Credits: )


For Mishele: Collectors do have permissible purpose to pull a credit report.If you could prove that either their account info is incorrect or they are pulling multiple times to poison your report they can be sued under fcra.

On to topic,service members are help up to a higher standard as per moral or character.Only time I would think military would get frisky about debt is security clearances. Most service members have just as many if not more rights than regular civilian.


lrhall41

Submitted by cajunbulldog on Fri, 02/02/2007 - 11:23

( Posts: 4850 | Credits: )


Quote:

Also, since military members aren't supposed to be in debt I wouldn't go passing around number or web sites because you don't want that information to happen upon to a suerior officer who has it out for your spouse because that creates a whole new set of issues unless you are specificaly asked by someone.



This is a misconception that many debt collectors have. I've been told by CA's that they're going to call my 1st Sgt have me discharged for financial irresponsibility. The first thing the 1st Sgt is going to say is "I can't force him to pay his bill, but will talk to him/her." Then they're going to tell the collector it's a civil matter. Unfortunately in this day and age everybody carry's debt and not everybody can avoid issues that result in debts becoming past due. Now, if a member goes out and gets loans with the intent not to pay them back, that is a different story. Troops will get in trouble if they show total irresponsibilty and have collectors calling them on a daily basis at work and not try to work and get the problems resolved. With everything the military has to deal with they can't get bogged down with debt collectors calling the first sgt/commander. It needs to be taken care of in court. I'm in the military and went through some very stressful situations with debt collectors and them threatening my career. If I knew then what I know now, a couple of them would have ended up in court for violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. As it was, I ended up worrying so much about losing everything, they almost put me in the hospital for a nervous break down. That is when I decided to start educating myself about my rights as a consumer and fight these idiots back. Now, if your husband was an officer, that's a horse of a different color. Officers are held to much higher standards than enlisted members. I've been in for 22 years and have yet to see an officer working a part time job to help pay their debt.


lrhall41

Submitted by macwetzel on Sat, 02/03/2007 - 08:45

( Posts: 10 | Credits: )


Tasha: I would need more info to comment properly so I will give you info generally.

Creditors are allowed to pull your report when you open a new account,to collect on existing account,to review an existing account, and if you are not opted out to do promotional reviews to mail consumer preapproved cards or offers.

All of the information I am giving you comes from the fdcpa & FCRA statutes.You can go to ftc.gov and study up on them. The good thing about this statute is if you can prove inquiries are illegal,they have to delete them and you have a cause of action for getting money for them.

Good Luck,
cajunbulldog :D


lrhall41

Submitted by cajunbulldog on Sun, 02/04/2007 - 05:26

( Posts: 4850 | Credits: )


From what I know, military members are just like anyone else and get in debt like anyone else. I think the misconception comes from the time of enlistment. At that time military members should not be in debt but if it's not something anyone is made aware of, they enlist anyway. This is an example of the "Don't ask; Don't tell" policy. I think that they can't enlist if they are going through a bankruptcy because it's an open court matter and enlistment can't happen until the court matter is resolved. As for the SAR, there is a lot of misconception about that too -- especially by debt collectors. If a member of the military is deployed and actively serving duty in a war zone, they are protected by the SAR. However, if they are deployed overseas and their permanent duty station is not in a war zone, then they are not protected. Because of the complexities of the SAR, most collection companies won't go after a member of the military for a debt owed until they are back in the U.S.

The SAR is very confusing because it doesn't specify under what circumstances a military members are protected and when they aren't. It's so complex that even the judicial system prefers to avoid the issue.

As for the senior officers, my belief is that their job is to ensure that each serviceman under their command is performing their job as to "ensure the mission." In other words, whatever that mission is, if the man or woman is performing in such a way as to ensure the success of that mission, that is all the senior officers, i.e., command really care about. However, if a serviceman's debts, personal life (such as a marriage or stress at home) affect their ability to perform in the mission, then that is when a senior officer gets involved. Although the military doesn't like the "black marks" that gets placed on the military by its servicemembers, they aren't going to do anything until such time as they believe that a black mark is going to occur.

We learned this the hard way with my daughter and her husband. He cut off my daughter's dependent support and had an affair with a senior officer. All of the other officers knew about it and looked the other way. Then when my daughter tried to contact her husband about it, they ran interference for him -- to the extent that when she called to his base from the U.S., even the operator would send the call off into Neverland so that my daughter hardly ever got through to the right person. When she did get through, all they would do is get surly with her and told her all they would do is take a message.


lrhall41

Submitted by DebtFairy on Sun, 02/04/2007 - 09:59

( Posts: 402 | Credits: )


We ran this through our local congressman's office which in turn contacted the pentagon. This was after she got the judgment for over $17,000 from him and then when a portion of it got paid by the military and deposited into his account, he took about $2,000 before sending the rest on to her. The pentagon only collected about $800 for her. Basically, we've had to scratch our way through this on our own. We just filed a motion for contempt against him and a motion for sanctions against his attorney. The scum bag "volunteered" for duty in Afghanistan right after he took the money despite the fact that he was ordered to mediate as soon as possible. He's back from Afghanistan in Germany now and taking leave mid-Feb through early March. Guess he has a surprise waiting for him when he comes back. In short, we've had no assistance or support from the military on this and only limited support and assistance from the congressman's office. We've had to feel our way all along in this process. So far we are holding our own and I think it's going to end up in my daughter's favor since he never responded to her counterclaim to his initial divorce petition over 2 years ago. By now, his lack of response is deemed an admission of guilt for an At-Fault divorce.


lrhall41

Submitted by DebtFairy on Sun, 02/04/2007 - 14:26

( Posts: 402 | Credits: )


debt collection agencies are works very efficiently,
large agencies are get more results with in short span of time, fair debt collection act is stops the debt collector, harassing the people. i know one good resource on how to manage the problems arised due to debtcollectors harassment and how to manage debts collectors.


lrhall41

Submitted by shyamprasad_5292001 on Sun, 02/04/2007 - 21:40

( Posts: 2 | Credits: )