logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

I noticed something on my Cashland PDL contract...

Date: Mon, 03/19/2007 - 16:20

Submitted by ladybugmisty
on Mon, 03/19/2007 - 16:20

Posts: 51 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 33


That I've never noticed before, and it's got me concerned. The following is what is typed on the back of the contract, and I'm wondering if it could mean wage assignment?





Does this mean wage assignment? I work for State government here in Ohio, so is it possible for Cashland to do a wage assignment on me? I thought I read somewhere on this board that wage assignments cannot be done on wages earned by State government jobs. Does it mean the new bank account I opened could be debited from by Cashland? Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!


Misty[/quote]


Sass,
Simply type up a letter stating you are in disagreement with that clause and forbid them to use that based on federal laws governing privacy of financial information.Send it certified return receipt.Ensure employer and any financial institution has a copy along with T&C. I am gonna dig up that law and get back to you;


lrhall41

Submitted by cajunbulldog on Mon, 03/19/2007 - 17:31

( Posts: 4850 | Credits: )


No, they can not just withdraw from her account. They would have to go to civil court in OH and get a judgement. They can then garnish her wages. The State of OH government does not allow for voluntary wage assignments of its employees it must be a court ordered garnishment. Also, by OH pdl law, the consumer is entitled to a re-payment plan.


lrhall41

Submitted by WHEREAMI? on Mon, 03/19/2007 - 18:09

( Posts: 5263 | Credits: )


When I spoke to Cashland a long time ago, they stated they have to run the checks through and the it would go to their collections department. They said they would work with someone on payments but they have to pay half of what is owed up front or something like that. I've heard they are easy to work with. Have you contacted them to let them know about your situation?


lrhall41

Submitted by Cow & Chicken on Mon, 03/19/2007 - 18:31

( Posts: 3571 | Credits: )


[Thanks a lot, Cajunbulldog. I will do that. What a nightmare...I never realized they could go look for a new account and take money from it!!!]

Hi -- just throwing my two cents in here, but wouldn't they need express permission from the accountholder to do anything with another account? I mean, I know from experience that we had to sign a form granting permission for the company to use the account (like the direct deposit form you get from your job).

If the company doesn't have one of those forms with you giving them permission, can they really do anything??


lrhall41

Submitted by mlposting on Tue, 03/20/2007 - 08:39

( Posts: 29 | Credits: )


Business's can't require you to give access to your account, but most of these people hope you get scared of their baseless threats and that you do not know your rights to protect your account. I like it when they say you have to give me your account information. I tell them I don't have to give you @#*&.


lrhall41

Submitted by WHEREAMI? on Tue, 03/20/2007 - 15:33

( Posts: 5263 | Credits: )


I am having a problem with them also. In fact when I told them that I was filing for bk, the lady who called me asked for the case number. Since I have not paid off my attorney as yet I only have a record number and this is what he told me to give the creditors who call me. She then asked me why I have not filed yet. I told her then that if I had the money to pay off my attorney that I would have paid cashland. she called me again today asking me for a case number and I told her the same thing (she called me at work.) When I got home there was a message on vm from her at 4:58 and she proceeded to say that since we talked she was going to have to go to legal and thatmaybe I should file bk before the legal department gets in contact with me and then she said the "Good Luck" thing at the end! This is a vm that everyone in this house has access to and this is no ones business but mine! I am beyond pi@#ed!!


lrhall41

Submitted by Colleen H Carrocia on Tue, 03/20/2007 - 16:22

( Posts: 1117 | Credits: )


She is trying to bully you. How much longer until you get the bk attorney paid? Just give them the record number. Hopefully you can get him paid soon. Let legal get in contact with you. Just state this is my record number and this is my attorney's number, leave it at that. Don't tell them you haven't paid him completely.


lrhall41

Submitted by WHEREAMI? on Tue, 03/20/2007 - 16:28

( Posts: 5263 | Credits: )


Hi, I am back after a nice long weekend....

About my comment/question about "express permission" on the 20th of March...

Yes, if you sign a contract and it is associated with one bank account you have, I don't think that they are allowed to do anything with another bank account, since it is not associated with that contract.

That is what I was getting at, and asking about.

Cheers!


lrhall41

Submitted by mlposting on Mon, 03/26/2007 - 09:01

( Posts: 29 | Credits: )


I have been dealing with CashLand for a few weeks now. The guy Drew has been a total a$$, not to mention everytime I call that company I NEVER get a real person, even during regular business hours, yet there seems to be no way to get a real person. CashLand called me a few weeks ago saying that I needed to step into the store and resolve the issue by 7pm as I was at work when they called I didn't get the message until 11pm, so either as soon as I got home or the next day I called them back, only to get a general voicemail box. In my message I explained what was going on (I had to put nearly $1,000 worth of work into my car in the matter of 2 weeks) and that I would be able to resolve the issue on 7 July 2007. I hadn't heard anything more for a few days, so I assumed they accepted my arrangement to take care of the issue on 7 July. Yet another call from the oh, so charming Drew, again saying that I need to step into the Cleveland Ave store and resolve this issue (wish I would have saved this message). I am off on this day, so I call back ASAP, this time I get a real person only long enough to explain to her why I am calling when she says, OK let me transfer you to Drew. According to "Audix" (a voicemail system) "Drew, is busy" and I should leave a voicemail. I leave a message referencing my voicemail on the general mailbox and again say I will be able to resolve the issue on 7 July 2007. Again no communication with the company (I assume it is accepted), until 29 June 2007, Drew calls yet again claiming to have previously called saying that the issue needed to be resolved during June (first my payday was the week before and I wont get paid again until 6 July, second in the message he is referencing he only said the issue needs to be resolved, finally this is the last BUSINESS day in June) again I get the message at 11pm upon arriving home from work, I call them back either when I get home or the following day (saying I will be able to resolve this issue on 7 July 2007). It is now 2 July 2007 and I get another message from Drew, this time before I go to work, saying that the issue needed to be resolved during June and that 7 July would not be a possible date to resolve the issue and saying something about roles being reversed and that the company is demanding their money (I think to myself I would gladly give you the money, if I HAD IT). I attempt to contact the company again only to get voicemail, at this point I'm running late for work so I give up and go into work.

This has been on my mind all day long, and obviously (as it is 5:00am EDT) I am not sleeping because of it. As I have read here, those in Ohio (where I am) with PDLs in default must be granted repayment options does anyone have or know where I can obtain this law? Wouln't my voicemails to the company constitute an attempt to set up a repayment plan? I don't know what else to do, I am totally stressed out about this. Any advice would be wonderful!


lrhall41

Submitted by osudougie84 on Tue, 07/03/2007 - 02:17

( Posts: | Credits: )