logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Going To Court

Date: Sun, 05/20/2007 - 11:52

Submitted by fedupinpa
on Sun, 05/20/2007 - 11:52

Posts: 1511 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 60


Well guys and girls, Blatt, Leibsker & Moore finally gave me a court date with the local magistrate. 6/12/07 I will go to court, they hired a lawyer from Pa. I am hoping that my correspondence will hold some weight. For the past 3-4 months they wanted me to pay large sums that I could not afford. They hung up on me once when I called to confirm their fax number. They said they never recieved my correspondence, when I sent it to the fax number on the letterhead, they stated it was the wrong one. I have made settlement offers and payment arrangements offers that they have completely ignored. What are you guys thoughts? I have copies of everything in my attempt to work this out, they have not cooperated from the beginning. They are representing the original creditor, capital one. Original debt was $500, they wanted $1200, I made an offer between the two. No negotiation, no communication, just threats and now a court date. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.


I will cajun, I am going to request that, just not sure how I will handle the wording yet in my return discovery. this is possible right? Wording it something like.

Jeff Meek, attested to first hand knowlege of debt and will be available to testify to his knowledge in court setting.
admit_____
Deny_____

if deny, please explain Mr. Meeks capacity in this case. (See exhibit 1) Copy of affadavit.

I want to add a few more in the discovery process about Mr. Meeks. Like questioning, who he is actually employed by, etc.

Do you think this is the way to approach it from the discovery end of things. I am trying to come up with wording in my discovery that makes them lay EVERYTHING out.


lrhall41

Submitted by fedupinpa on Sat, 06/23/2007 - 04:39

( Posts: 1511 | Credits: )


Fed,you would look into challenging the paper in a few different ways. One is motion to strike it as hearsay followed by requiring person to come to trial to testify if it is allowed in. You could write up a request for admissions and forward it to the person to declare under penalty of perjury that they have first hand knowledge of the debt.Review your rules of civil procedure and have fun.


lrhall41

Submitted by cajunbulldog on Sun, 06/24/2007 - 04:40

( Posts: 4850 | Credits: )


I was just kidding ang, LOL, it sure does get me to get off my butt and do research on things that I generally would not care about that is for sure. My degree is in criminology and I work as a veterans employment representative. So far out of the field it is pathetic. Debt collection sure does not fit in there anywhere.


lrhall41

Submitted by fedupinpa on Sun, 06/24/2007 - 07:09

( Posts: 1511 | Credits: )