logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Questions about states with "loopholes" regarding

Date: Fri, 06/01/2007 - 03:17

Submitted by Scooby4Prez
on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 03:17

Posts: 34 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 5


I've been doing alot of reading on here about IPDL's and what the legal status' are in various states. I've noticed on some postings that they say there are some states that have "loopholes" in the laws there that allow these companies in through the back door (so to speak). Does anyone know what states have these "loopholes"? I believe that could be of some use to someone when writing a settlement letter or for that matter anything dealing with a IPDL. And if someone lived in one of the states what are their opitions to try to resolve their PDL problems?


The only state I can think of is PA. There is some debate over this. I personally think and have been told by the AG there they have to abide by the interest the state law sets. However another forum member whom I do believe has received e-mails stating otherwise. Her e-mails have come from the department of banking. So this does seem to be a confusing situation. KYSIDE38


lrhall41

Submitted by KYSIDE38 on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 05:41

( Posts: 2477 | Credits: )


Some state's also don't have "long arm" statutes . . . . That's another way they can get through. These long arm statutes are what says that if a business enters into a transaction with a consumer in another state they are bound by the laws of the state of the consumer.

Minnesota is an example of that.


lrhall41

Submitted by goudah2424 on Fri, 06/01/2007 - 10:41

( Posts: 7935 | Credits: )