Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Mitchell N. Kay froze my bank accounts

Date: Sat, 10/20/2007 - 06:05

Submitted by katli10
on Sat, 10/20/2007 - 06:05

Posts: Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 46


I need help please. The "Law Office" of Mitchell N. Kay has not only sent us a letter garnishing my husband's wages, but yesterday I checked out joint accounts and found they had put a restraining order on them. We live paycheck to paycheck and one of the accounts frozen is the one where we get our paychecks direct deposited. I spoke to some idiot there who is NOT an attorney and he made it sound like Amex will do anything to collect and that they don't care that I have a family and that they will wait for our pay to hit our accounts and then take half of that (the half my husband is entitled to). This would bankrupt us, we won't be able to pay for daycare, We won't have enough money to pay for rent, etc. I said to this guy that I would be willing to work out a payment plan, but he started talking about Amex wanting $500 immediately and that they might not go for it and just take our money. This is pretty much a nightmare. Luckily I have my own personal checking account where I have some money, but not enough to last two weeks. If these people keep our accounts frozen we will have no income. I mentioned that to this idiot and he said that Amex has heard alot of "stories" and that people hide money all the time. When he froze our joint account, we had $2.00 in there. He said he is going to get back to me on Monday with a settlement, or payment plan. I'm afraid he is going to ask for money I don't have or that they won't release the accounts in time for my husband's pay on Thursday and mine on the 31st. I need help because if they do this to me, their office is ten blocks away from where I work and I'm going to go over there and show them that if they screw me and take food out of my kid's mouths, then I have nothing to lose and I WILL make them pay for it.


You have direct deposit? Can you change the direct deposit to another account? I'm sure it can be done in time, my wife did it and so did I. I did it the day before I was paid and it worked just fine. Can you have the money deposited directly into your other checking account that you talked about? I think if you talk to your payroll and bank, and your husband does the same, that should work. I'm not sure if that's even legal, because you said there is a restraining order on your account, but I'd at least look into it.
Hopefully someone will give some more advice on how to help you.
Good luck and let us know what happens.


lrhall41

Submitted by submarinesailor on Sat, 10/20/2007 - 06:49

( Posts: 114 | Credits: )


(((Hugs))) katli10! I know how it feels to live paycheck to paycheck, and have children to feed.

OK, first thing is first. Have payroll stop direct deposit IMMEDIATELY! Since you have a CA looking to seize assets, you'll want to get your paycheck via papercheck, if it's at all possible. And if you have any funds in your other account, I would withdraw them.

Some people might not like that idea, but you need to remember to worry about about your necessities first- rent/housing, food, utilities, and transportation to work/school.

I am assuming this CA has a court order against you?

After you take care of your necessities I mentioned above, whatever is left from the paycheck is what your going to offer to the CA.

I once has a freeze on my bank account for $1000.00, meanwhile I only had $700.00 in my account. I spoke with the collection Agency/Law Office, and begged, pleaded, and cried. I told them I had my son to feed and house first. I kept calling and calling, all day long. They eventually gave in. They reduced the freeze on my account to $600.00, and took that as a down payment. They then set up payment arrangements for $250 a month; which was still very steep for me. The first month, I had to borrow money from my parents to get through things!!!


lrhall41

Submitted by Kelly from NY on Sat, 10/20/2007 - 07:42

( Posts: 35 | Credits: )


Hi Katli! I am in TOTAL agreement with Kelly. Change your paycheck to receive it in paper form, put an account in someone else's name that you trust, do ANYTHING that you have to (that is legal of course), but you have to make sure your family is ok. Beg and plead for a payment arrangement that meets your budget, but protect your paychecks as best you can. I am surprised that you got some sort of notification, but at least you did and you can do a little something to make sure you get your bills paid. I know that this may not be the best advice, but it is the only thing I can think of at this point that might half-way work. Good luck, and please, please keep us informed.


lrhall41

Submitted by eleroo on Sat, 10/20/2007 - 08:05

( Posts: 1220 | Credits: )


Contact them to determine if they have received a judgment against you, if they say yes then ask for a docket number as well as the court where the judgment was issued and the name of the magistrate as well as the attorney that had represented them. If they did not sue you and get a judgment against you then wage garnishment and account levies are illegal. If they did sue you and you were not notified of the suit then you could get the judgment thrown out based on improper service.

If I can be of any further assistance please let me know.

Regards

JCEMT


lrhall41

Submitted by JCEMT on Sat, 10/20/2007 - 15:33

( Posts: 2934 | Credits: )


Also if they were to properly obtain judgment they magistrate would not force you to stay a payment plan or other legal actions that would place you in too much financial hardship.

P.S.
If they had performed these actions illegally (as it sounds so far) it may be a scare tactic to force you to make a promise to pay to trap you into paying (possibly for something you might not even owe)


lrhall41

Submitted by JCEMT on Sat, 10/20/2007 - 15:36

( Posts: 2934 | Credits: )


I am not familiar with the collection agency name. Are they collectors or attorney's for AMEX. There is a slight difference but not much that will help you.

When you come to the point of not paying an account for a certain period of time creditors are less willing to work for you and they don't really care about anyhting but the contract you signed saying if you default you will pay the balance in full immediatly.

Did you recieve any documentation before all of this happened? What state do you live in?


lrhall41

Submitted by FYI on Sat, 10/20/2007 - 15:50

( Posts: 1950 | Credits: )


Yes, but no magistrate that I have ever met will issue a judgment that will destroy a persons financial ability to live. One of the big questions is: were they served? Based on what I have read so far it doesn't sound like it, of course we won't really know until we obtain further clarification from the original poster...


lrhall41

Submitted by JCEMT on Sat, 10/20/2007 - 16:00

( Posts: 2934 | Credits: )


I tried posting a reply but it didn't go through. We weren't served anything, everything was mailed. We recently received a notice from the city Marshall's office with a docket number announcing that they were garnishing my husband's wages. Then last week I received copies of restraining orders for every major bank in NY. Except ours. Well they found out where we bank and this week we received a copy of an order for our bank and our accounts were frozen. Now I'm not sure we can switch to paper checks in time. I work for the city and they take forever and payday is coming up soon. My husband is not sure either. So we have only $400 to last us and daycare to pay for at the end of the week. They won't let me children go back if we don't pay. I won't be able to work. Yeah, we are panicking. These people, law firm, I don't know who they are are really putting the screws to us. I have a docket number but have no idea who to call who the judge is or anything and I can't take off work. I called Amex and they replied that they no longer service this account so I'm guess this is a CA that bought the account and is suing us. The guy I spoke with Friday sure sounded like one. He said he is going to get back to me on Monday with information on what "the client" will accept. How do I handle this? We are freaking out and this has been a hellish weekend. The b**terds deliberately did this on a Friday so we would have very little time to do anything except panic. We live in New York City, not too far away from Mitchell N. Kay actually. Any advice is appreciated. BTW, they are all over the internet in terms of bad collection practices and violations.


lrhall41

Submitted by katli10 on Sun, 10/21/2007 - 10:12

( Posts: | Credits: )


Check back with the city marshal, find out what court it was was from, whom the magistrate is. Inform the magistrate that you were never served papers. I'm guessing if they did actually go through the court system they either never served you or they sent the service documents to the wrong address (most likely on purpose) so that they could get a default judgment since you would not have shown up. You need to let the magistrate who awarded the judgment know that you were never serviced and see about getting the judgment overruled. If the magistrate will not help you be prepared to speak to a attorney because what has been done to you is very wrong, you should consider suing for punitive damages, mental anguish, etc.


lrhall41

Submitted by JCEMT on Sun, 10/21/2007 - 10:27

( Posts: 2934 | Credits: )


kati - do you know if you particular city department has a web site? Do you know how to contact your HR/payroll rep? Call them first thing tomorrow. This may or may not help; my purse was stolen & my check book was in it. I called my bank & reported it & the lady told me to call my employer & have the electronic direct deposit stopped immediately. I did; my company processes payroll on Tuesday and I'm paid the following Friday.
My employer explained to me that they have a deadline to electronically submit the payroll. If you call first thing tomorrow morning - your payroll/HR will help you.


lrhall41

Submitted by hvn_sent on Sun, 10/21/2007 - 11:07

( Posts: 218 | Credits: )


I want to make sure this poster gets the help she needs, so I'm going to keep this thread visible to them=
Bump


lrhall41

Submitted by JCEMT on Mon, 10/22/2007 - 07:19

( Posts: 2934 | Credits: )


I can tell you based on my experiences - The courts in my state care very little about what you can afford. I went to court a few months ago and the very first thing the judge said was "If you are here with a defense of I can't afford it. then you may as well leave because that is not a valid defense" or something along those lines. The courts only care if the debt is valid and legal, not if you can afford to pay it.

I'm confused - If you are getting all the court documents and such mailed to you, then that would be the address they sent the original summons to.

I agree that you need to try to get paper checks. Do not put anything into your bank account. You have to take care of the necessities first, then deal with this.

But getting a judgement thrown out after it's been awarded is an uphill battle. Especially if you actually owe the debt.


lrhall41

Submitted by goudah2424 on Mon, 10/22/2007 - 07:59

( Posts: 7935 | Credits: )


Quote:

Besides, if a magistrate were to issue such judgment then they will eventually lose their jobs, then they will never see the rest of the money they are seeking.


What do you mean? They courts are there to determine if the debt is legal and valid, not if the debtor can afford to pay. The judges don't get any part of the judgement, they are paid by the state or county. Are we talking about two totally different things here? I'm confused . . . .


lrhall41

Submitted by goudah2424 on Mon, 10/22/2007 - 08:03

( Posts: 7935 | Credits: )


Here is what NACA lawyer Bud Hibbs has to say about Mitchell N Kay.
"Lawyer Mitch Kay is also involved with Plaza Associates and MKM Acquisitions. His organizations have a bad reputation for fdcpa and FCRA violations. They hire under-trained semi-desperate collectors who are hell-bent on a paycheck at any cost. I suggest that you give them the boot via the FREE cease-comm letter. You need not worry about their threats of a lawsuit, Kay likely hasn't seen a court-room since law school."


lrhall41

Submitted by Frogpatch on Mon, 10/22/2007 - 11:17

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )


I am confused also. Once I made a "payment" to a lawyer as an installment and he used the account info on my check to freeze my account. I think something like that may have happened in this case. It is scary that anyone who is a lawyer can freeze an account just on their say so. I had some dealing with Kay in the past but I do not remember for what. It may have been Amex.


lrhall41

Submitted by Frogpatch on Mon, 10/22/2007 - 11:24

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )


Whenever a magistrate issues a judgment in favor of any debt (be it commercial or individual) there is supposed to be a separate hearing for the collection of said judgment. The debtor will have to list all assets, etc. based on that the magistrate will issue the order for any garnishment/levy/lien based on the person's assets (including income) I would guess that the only reason that the levy on the account is so high is because of the default judgment that the CA most likely received. Also, something that I remembered today, when katli10 stated that they would be taking half of the pay, I remembered that there is supposed to be a cap on the percentage of garnishment per pay check (I believe it to be 20%) There are so many things fishy about this scenario.


lrhall41

Submitted by JCEMT on Mon, 10/22/2007 - 13:13

( Posts: 2934 | Credits: )


Things that jump out at me:
1. Garnishment above what is legally allowed
2. A bank levy that absorbs what is left (in effect making the garnishment 100%)
3. A notice from the city marshal's office as opposed to court documentation
4. No summons received
5. The poster originally stated that the garnishment was received via the law firm (also no court official involvement)


lrhall41

Submitted by JCEMT on Mon, 10/22/2007 - 13:35

( Posts: 2934 | Credits: )


Quote:

I am confused also. Once I made a "payment" to a lawyer as an installment and he used the account info on my check to freeze my account. I think something like that may have happened in this case. It is scary that anyone who is a lawyer can freeze an account just on their say so.


How can this be legal frogpatch?

It is my understanding someone has to obtain a Judgement and go through the Courts to levy a bank account....unless, of course, it is good 'ol Internal Revenue that is doing the levying.

On the issue of attorney's obtaining a judgment without ever notifying the debtor..... An Attorney informed me in the past, in some cases a collection attorney who can provide clear evidence that you owe the debt,can slip in, and convince a Judge to grant a summary Judgement.

With Judgement in hand, the Attorney can then levy your checking account before the debtor is even aware anyone has a Judgement against them.


lrhall41

Submitted by Reesie on Wed, 10/31/2007 - 08:51

( Posts: 122 | Credits: )


You have to be sued, and loose. Some CAs will attempt some rather underhanded tactics such as send you a manufactured document with a altered court date or send the summons to a address that you have not lived at or have not lived at for some time. In which case you may speak to the magistrate to have the judgment vacated due to improper service.


lrhall41

Submitted by JCEMT on Thu, 11/01/2007 - 17:37

( Posts: 2934 | Credits: )


during the summer, i was sued by an creditor and judgement was enter against me, i could not afford to have my check garnished so i filed what is called a slow pay. that is were you pay the clerks office a 25.00 fee and they set you another court date. also, i had to list all my debts and when i went to court, the judge determined that i could not afford to have my check garnished, so i had to pay the courts $25 a month on a $2,000 bill. now that's how they operate in my state. you should check with your county clerks office.


lrhall41

Submitted by granny on Thu, 11/01/2007 - 17:49

( Posts: 450 | Credits: )


This is just a note to add to this threadl I have been taken to court. It turned out OK..I had a credit card company sue me and threatened garnishment (which is 25% of your spendable income..which is anything after taxes) and I went to court on that day. When I arrived they called my name and before we got to court the lawyer(for this ccc) asked if I could afford a payment plan..she was very nice..we worked out a deal and I eventually paid them off. Moral of the story...when you get mail that states it is from a court you need take action. Yes it does makes you nervous and uncomfortable..but don't just ignore it and hope it will go away.


lrhall41

Submitted by laura19544 on Tue, 11/06/2007 - 07:31

( Posts: 456 | Credits: )


I noticed a judgement against me dated 2003 on the public records section of my bank account. I never received any notice whatsoever to indicate that I was being sued at all. I had no information of who the original creditor was.

I received a package in the mail this past Saturday from Mitchell N. Kay with what appeared to be court documents threatening to levy my accounts. Today (Thursday) I checked my account an found that I was overdrawn $6,566.70!!! To make a long story short, I contacted Mitchell N. Kay, they told me the actual amount was for $3,291.90 and told me the only way for them to unfreeze my account is to settle the amount. The lawyer couldn't tell me what the original amount was for, so I pulled a number out of my a$$ and told him $2,800. I now feel like I was hoodwinked. He's checking to see if the original creditor (Orchard Bank) will accept that amount over 3 payments.

Should I have done something else?


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 11/15/2007 - 08:25

( Posts: | Credits: )


I meant to say on the public records section of my CREDIT REPORT, not my bank account... sorry!


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 11/15/2007 - 08:28

( Posts: | Credits: )


I really think that you should go to the NACA website and get yourself an attorney that is experienced in these cases. Some of them will take the case on contigincy if they think there is a winnable lawsuit there. Others may set up a plan to pay them. Mitchell Kay, from what I have read, will not set foot in a courtroom against another attorney because their practices are so underhanded.


lrhall41

Submitted by Frogpatch on Thu, 11/15/2007 - 08:34

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )


Just to keep you all posted, the attorney I found on the NACA website told me that the judgment against me is so old, the actual file was archived. He tells me that is good news, because if the courts don't have the papers readily available, chances are that Mitchell Kay doesn't have the documents they'll need to win their case, but that I'll have to wait about 4 weeks for him to get the file.

In the meantime, I have been cashing my check at the local check cashing business to survive.

So, at least 4 more weeks until the next update. Keep your fingers crossed for me!!! I am glad I took frogpatch's advice and obtained a lawyer!! I feel so much more at ease knowing that someone who has experience is at the helm.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 12/03/2007 - 12:18

( Posts: | Credits: )


UPDATE: I took "the Law Offices of Mitchell N. Kay" to court yesterday to vacate the judgment against me (including the freeze on my bank account). My attorney told me that a lawyer from Mitchell N. Kay called to tell him they would not contest our motion. The attorney from Mitchell Kay did not even show up. Although we expected the judgment to be vacated, the judge actually dismissed the original summons and complaint against me by Mitchell Kay!!! CASE CLOSED!!!

Thank you frogpatch, for the excellent advice about getting an attorney from the NACA website! I'm so glad I listened!

Now that I have that judgment off my public record, I can continue on the road to rebuilding my credit-worthiness. :D


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 02/21/2008 - 09:10

( Posts: | Credits: )