Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

I made a BIG mistake talking to CA HELP!

Date: Tue, 10/30/2007 - 13:29

Submitted by anonymous
on Tue, 10/30/2007 - 13:29

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 23


I spoke with Enhanced Recovery Corporation last week about a collection debt I have. The amount I owe is 2,433.00. They said they would be abe to take a settlement payout of 1634.00 in 4 installemnts. At the time I agreed since I do have the money and just wanted them off my back. They also told me I was being recorded.


I did give them my debit card number which they insisted in having to start the payment installments. Well the card number I gave them is inactive. I canceled this card ( guess they will realize when they try and use it next week) when my first payment was to of posted.

Anyhow now I have changed my mind and want to send them a validation letter first before I start paying them.

Am I allowed to do this or am I stuck with the agreement I made over the phone with them last week?

I am so worried because I was being recorded. Can they come back and tell me that if i don't do what we agreed upon that the settlment is off the table and i have to pay the whole amount or and Sue?


From what you said it sounds like you are stuck with that agreement you made over the phone, and yes the validation letter should of been sent first. Anyway, that is water under the bridge. Instead of the validation letter at this time (you may be able to send it later), I would send a letter stating what had happen when you made the conversation that you forgot the debit card was cancelled and would like to make a new arrangment by mailing money orders and most places if they want there money will do that. In the meantime, I would not talk to them over the phone untill they get this "new payment plan" letter from you. Send this letter certifed mail with a return reciept request as soon as possible and keep us posted here so that we can help you futher.


lrhall41

Submitted by Lukeskywalker on Tue, 10/30/2007 - 14:33

( Posts: 1909 | Credits: )


Then this is what I would do. Do not talk or call them on the phone and send out "validation" letter with a new payment request stateing that you did not realize that the debit card was closed. Make sure that you are clear that you need it validated before any payment plan is in effect from you and if they can not validate it, then I believe that you should not pay it. Do this asap cc/rr.


lrhall41

Submitted by Lukeskywalker on Tue, 10/30/2007 - 14:43

( Posts: 1909 | Credits: )


No do not call them, relax, and let the validation letter stand. I hope you have a copy of it. If they call you, try to let them leave a message without talking to them in hopes that they will mail you a response to the validation letter. So, let them make the next move, but in the mean time, come up with a letter about the new payment plan.


lrhall41

Submitted by Lukeskywalker on Tue, 10/30/2007 - 14:52

( Posts: 1909 | Credits: )


Quote:

Instead of being underhanded about it why don't you call them and tell them that the card is inactive. The person you are working with now, and could be still after the debt gets validated, might like a little honesty.


When dealing with CA's who are very often underhanded themselves... imo, the debtor should proceed with what s/he feels is best for her/his specific situation.


lrhall41

Submitted by Reesie on Wed, 10/31/2007 - 09:20

( Posts: 122 | Credits: )


Ah, I forgot we are dealing with a monkey see monkey do situation. Not all collection agencies or collectors are underhanded. Each situation should be treated accordingly. If you act dishonest do you expect honesty in return and are you suprised when you don't get it?


lrhall41

Submitted by FYI on Wed, 10/31/2007 - 14:40

( Posts: 1950 | Credits: )


Quote:

Ah, I forgot we are dealing with a monkey see monkey do situation. Not all collection agencies or collectors are underhanded. Each situation should be treated accordingly. If you act dishonest do you expect honesty in return and are you suprised when you don't get it?


I don't conclude that a person is acting dishonestly because s/he changes her/his mind, and decides on a different course of action to secure her/his best interests.

Its very obvious after giving the situation more thought, the poster didn't feel comfortable making payment until the CA validates the debt.

Who stated that all CA's are dishonest??


lrhall41

Submitted by Reesie on Wed, 10/31/2007 - 17:39

( Posts: 122 | Credits: )


wow FYI-is someone (YOU) accusing someone else of acting dishonest here? (unbelievable as a moderator on this site in my opinion!) --debt validation is a normal procedure from what I have learned here --how about when you have lived your life honestly and you still got treated wrongly by Ca's? TRY that example of comparison once in a while instead of assuming that everyone you call is the "underhanded "person who owes your company money!and you in your chosen profession can't understand why people don't trust anything you say? and you in your friendly moderator posts that you get paid for very little of course--give's you the right and authority to turn around and actually ACCUSE someone of actually being underhanded here ? Dang! I know business is bad in America!--but why? your unfounded false accusations about underhandedness insinuating liars that all CA's project?-- when I have actually known you to previously offer good info for people on this sight? Are your commissions down big time or what? Please !as a moderator on this sight I would ask that you don't infer in the future that people are being underhanded because they asked for validation !!!What were you thinking?!!! please respond because I can't believe you actually have an excuse for this one! Your comment--Monkey see monkey do?--I think more like "Gorilla thinks has power to attack but is ultimately not the smartest species in ape kingdom-- then tries to use muscle--and when it's not working --gets pissed because no one throws him a banana!" JMO! But when you yourself attack others on this sight-- I myself will keep responding regardless of whether you have buddies here or not!p.s. why did you actually accuse someone of acting dishonest here? Doesn't make sense on a help you get out of debt sight but hey we are in fact an open forum!! Thank God for that!!!!


lrhall41

Submitted by HANKYSPANKY42 on Thu, 11/01/2007 - 01:13

( Posts: 196 | Credits: )


FYI, you are a incredible oasis of information and advise, and I must say a very good person and I am pleased to be blessed by reading your posts. I meant no harm or disrespect when I made the commment "Its not being underhanded to protect one self". It is just that I have been and still am dealing with collection agencies for about 25 years and I know that I did and do not deserve any of the abuse that they tried to dish out but at the same time there have been very nice and professional collection csr's where treated me like a person. Thank you.


lrhall41

Submitted by Lukeskywalker on Thu, 11/01/2007 - 03:22

( Posts: 1909 | Credits: )


A person has the right to change their minds at anytime. Always. But I feel that it is important to communicate as well. When the lines of communication fail on either side then the walls start to crumble and someone if not both sides lose their credibility and that makes something that could have been solves simply more difficult.


lrhall41

Submitted by FYI on Thu, 11/01/2007 - 04:28

( Posts: 1950 | Credits: )


I think the dishonesty comments stem from the fact that op gave a collector a inactive debit card number which would make them lose face should it be used and could also cause op fees if that card is honored by op's bank.I think op has the right to change their mind at any time and can request validation as well.


lrhall41

Submitted by cajunbulldog on Thu, 11/01/2007 - 05:00

( Posts: 4850 | Credits: )


Do not ever give them a debit card or access to your checking account. They will clean it out and then what are you going to do, go before a judge and say "well gee I owe them $2,400 but agreed to only let them have $1,600...they took too much". If you have the money, the judge won't give it back.

NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER give postdated checks or electronic access to your bank accounts.

New


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 11/01/2007 - 06:21

( Posts: | Credits: )


how about if they say the offer is only good for that day and you need to give them a check by phone or the offer is void? Happens everyday. That's how they get these CA into paying them that day, they scare them with a lawsuit. The consumer has no way of knowing iif he/she will get sue'd so they usually cave in and give the info the CA is requesting over the phone!


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 11/01/2007 - 06:42

( Posts: | Credits: )