You lame request for debt validation will not save you

HEY DEUTSCH BANK! I KNEW WE COULDN'T GO A WHOLE DAY WITHOUT SOME PDL DRIVEL.PLEASE WHEN WE EXCERCISE OUR RIGHTS AS CONSUMERS,YOU GUYS GO ON SOME STEPFORD WIVES RANT.OH AND I AM STILL WAITING FOR AN EXAMPLE ON THE OTHER POST.WHEN HAVE YOU EVER WON?I WILL WAIT FOR MY ANSWER.

Blah blah blah, AGAIN!

OH,AND LET'S NOT FORGET ABOUT IF WE GO TO COURT.
I PRESENT THE RECIEPT.FOR I WON'T SEND A DV WITHOUT A SIGNATURE REQUIRED.IF YOU TRY TO GET A JUDGEMENT EVEN ONE DAY AFTER THAT SIGNATURE,I CAN TURN AROUND AND FILE AN ACTION AGAINST YOU.CHEW ON THAT. :D

Quote:

It amazes me that these idiots post once and never return to defend what they say. Doesn't this person know that they can't proceed with collection until they properly validate. That tosses the "quick lawsuit" out the agency window.

would the storfronts usually accept a payment arangement rather than going to collections? arent collections going to usually end up costing them money anyway?

CHECK HOW I DEAL WITH A COLLECTION AGENCY.THIS CLOWN POSTED ON THERE.JECMT TOOK HIM OVER THE COALS.SO HE HAS TO POST HIMSELF.NICE GRAMMAR,I GUESS YOU DON'T NEED SKILLS OF ANY KIND TO BE A COLLECTION FOOL. :lol:

Well, once again, another slow day down at the CA. Still, I do find these posts entertaining. They're ususally just reworded versions of the same mindless drivel.

I guess they think they make us cry when they come here and post this garbage.

Wonder which law school "No Nonsense" went to? Doesn't seem to know what a summary judgment even is, and they aren't automatically awarded.

[quote=No Nonsense Collector]Do you not think the judge will not ask you, "do you owe this debt?"[/quote]

I think if he doesn't ask that question, he's dumber than you. Wonder what he'll say if I answer truthfully "I don't know, because the CA wouldn't validate the claim as required by law, even after several requests"?

[quote=No Nonsense Collector]Go ahead, perjure yourself and end up in jail.[/quote]

Look, dumbass, I ain't gonna 'splain this to you again.

[quote=No Nonsense Collector]Life would be much easier if you would just pay up.[/quote]

And you'd have much more money if you'd just get a job. Lots of people have them, and they have more money than you do.

No Nonsense Collector! I've been hoping you'd post again. You still haven't answered my question from the last post. What happens when I motion to show cause during discovery by requesting validation (the judge will approve as it is physical evidence of everything the judge wants to know, and when the judge approves the motion it becomes a request by the court) will your agency be able to produce the validation then?

He won't ever answer you JCEMT, because he can't..at least not truthfully. If he were to answer you, he would have to admit that the CA would then either have to produce the documentation, or get the case thrown out never to be sued upon again. He doesn????????t want to own up to that one simple truth.

What I'm getting at is partially that, if the plaintiff fails to show cause by producing said validation the defendant could motion for dismissal with prejudice. However the agency could validate to save and at the same time prove it's case. Why wouldn't they do so in the first place when the debtor requested it to begin with? When I request validation and it is given to me, after reviewing everything and make sure it is correct I will contact the CA right away to start talking about how we are going to handle the debt and try to get it paid off ASAP.

why is anyone still trying to talk to this troll? He only does this to waste everyone's time and everytime people keep posting in his threads, youre just giving him what he wants!

Question about validation letter.

You know how a collection letter states that if they do not hear from you within 30 day they assume the debt is legit. Can you ask for validation long after the 30 days have expired?

As I understand things, you can demand validation at any time. They don't maybe have to provide it after that thirty-day period. But they're going to have to provide it at some point, even if only in discovery should they decide to sue.

I believe in Texas, and possibly other states (someone chime in ) they do have to respond in 30-days. But for the most part, as wulf said, they will have to provide it at some point and after they receive your DV letter, they are to cease all collection activity.

Yeah, I agree with UncleWulf. As I understand the law, the CA can assume anything after the 30-day mark; however, the fdcpa has a paragraph that states if a consumer does not excercise the right to dispute within the 30-day period it can't be considered by a court as admission of liability. So, what this means to me is a CA still has to validate the debt if it does go to court.

And as we all know, a court or judge has the final word, not a CA. Even though, some would like to think they do.

I know I asked this question before, but don't remember if it was answered: Am I correct in my interpretation?

..I'll clarify to say that in my post, when I said "they" I mean the CA...not the consumer. Sorry. :?