Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Advice on a payment

Date: Mon, 02/25/2008 - 08:38

Submitted by Tweety71
on Mon, 02/25/2008 - 08:38

Posts: 2061 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 34


Hello everyone. I have an account with Stokes and Clinton I guess they are attorneys located in Alabama...I misplaced the letter giving me the option to pay 114.38 by the 25th. Well I called first thing this morning and told them I could not send in the full payment of $ 114.38. I would however send in half of it today and the rest of it next week. I thought I spoke clear enough that the woman on the phone could understand me. Of course she argued with me saying that if it wasn't in by 2pm today the agreement was null and void. She wanted me to do a check over the phone. I said no. Anyway, she called back at my place of employment and told me she didn't understand me before and ask if I was sending in the full payment. I argued with her after a few minutes. She wanted to talk to my human resource/payroll dept. She agree to a hardship payment of 228.76 by the end of the month. I don't have that much. If I send in something, would they except it and if it's not the amount agreed on can they garnish my wages? I got her very flustered on the phone...I'm just afraid if I do send in something now they will still garnish wages?

I'll take any advice...

Thanks,


when you say misplaced,is it kind of misplaced,or permanently misplaced?if you find that letter,it will give you leverage.it sounds like a typical ham and egg ca.someone should be able to give more info,but finding the letter is key to me.


lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Mon, 02/25/2008 - 08:48

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


so what were saying is,they want more than the amount that was agreed upon correct?if so and you have the letter.they don't have much wiggle room here.


lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Mon, 02/25/2008 - 08:57

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


Actually, the letter was to pay the $114.00 today (2/25) which tweety cannot pay. So if they are asking for $228 at the end of the month, they are within their rights since the arrangment on the letter could not be met.

Tweety-If you dont mind me asking, what is total amount that you owe and what kind of debt is this?


lrhall41

Submitted by volleyballmom on Mon, 02/25/2008 - 09:01

( Posts: 4143 | Credits: )


I wouldn't stress too much either, they would have to get a judgment against you then get a court order to garnish you wages. Also, I would have my doubts on their credibility, myself, just on the fact it seemed she tried to scare you by asking for your payroll department. She knew darn well if she spoke with your payroll department it was pretty much a waste of time; I doubt any payroll department is going to start sending your money out to other people without the proper paperwork.

I think everyone pretty much agrees, send them what you can right now (by money order or cashiers check) with a letter advising what you can pay and when you can pay it. Send it CMRRR. If they return the contents and don't accept the payment, then you have documentation that you tried to work something out with them. This might be useful if they attempt to sue you. You might want to mention in your letter they are only to communicate with you directly concerning this matter, no third parties, and they are not to call you at work.

Just my suggestion.


lrhall41

Submitted by FloridaRon on Mon, 02/25/2008 - 17:29

( Posts: 1190 | Credits: )


Forgot to mention that you should find out if there is a wage assignment clause in the contract. If there is, you can easily revoke it with a letter stating that.

Since it sounds like this is a credit card, though, I doubt wage assignment is involved.


lrhall41

Submitted by FloridaRon on Mon, 02/25/2008 - 17:31

( Posts: 1190 | Credits: )


Somehow I missed this thread and just now read it....I agree with Ron. You were coerced and browbeaten into agreeing to the payment....since by law she can't talk to your payroll dept in a collection effort! It was purely to frazzle you into an agreement.

Do you have full validation on this account? Check the contact for that wage garnishment clause, if it is there, revoke it.

Do as was suggested earlier, write a letter to them proposing a payment arrangement you initially wanted to do. If they give you any flak or bring up the fact that you agreed to the hardship payment, respond with you were coerced and threatened into it by an illegal threat of speaking to your HR dept. They have to produce the tape to prove you agreed to the payment, that SAME tape that has them violating the law. :)


lrhall41

Submitted by goldenbast on Tue, 02/26/2008 - 09:33

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )


Wow, not sure how we started posting in that other thread.

Tweety this is in response to your comment about the woman trying to stress they were and attorney's office.

Please, she's just arguing about words with you. What is she trying to imply, your particular debt is the only one they are collecting on?

If they are an attorney's office actively collecting debts, then they are a collection agency. They are bound by the fdcpa just like a CA would be. Attorney's offices that do function as CA's also violate the FDCPA as would a crooked CA, I think there are a couple of threads in the forum that would back me up on this.

And Yes they can sue you, but so could a CA. Their lawsuit isn't any more mystical or powerful that a CA's would be. Believe me when I say this, an attorney from legal aide got a lawsuit against me dismissed, that was filed by a collector attorney, because they did a botched job with the backup paperwork. I'm sure they were banking on the fact I wouldn't show up or follow up and they would get a default judgment.

The more I hear about your story, the more I feel she's just trying to scare and intimidate you. Don't be. Be firm and assertive when you deal with them, I wouldn't be rude or disrespectful unless they are, and make sure you can back yourself up with the FDCPA when needed.


lrhall41

Submitted by FloridaRon on Tue, 02/26/2008 - 09:35

( Posts: 1190 | Credits: )


tweety,as long as your'e making payments and staying in contact with them.i don't see how they can do anything like a garnishment.keep the faith my friend.


lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 06:12

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


This company is making me mad....They keep calling after I sent a letter telling them NOT to contact me especially at work! They have called 4 times and each time it's a different extension I need to ask for! :evil: Just had to vent! I'm starting to think they are shady- they always say the "law office of stokes and clinton"......wouldnt you think that I would need/should talk to 1 person only? :P


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 03/10/2008 - 08:54

( Posts: | Credits: )


no need for sorries,did you send them some sort of payment at last month's end?if you did just send another when you can.that is all you can do.jcemt should be along to help with the legal advice. i know it's irritating,but as long as your making payments whatever they are.they shouldn't be able to do what they are doing.


lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Mon, 03/10/2008 - 09:02

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


Tweety, I think we should be saying "Sorrys" to you. Sorrys you are going through this.

OK, this might be an obvious question; however, did you send that letter CMRRR? I'm sure you did, just want to make sure. Are you able to document they continue to call you at work? Do you have a caller ID on your phone at work? A cell phone with a camera? Can you take a picture of said CID with your cell phone? Any witnesses that can back up the fact they are calling you at work?

I think you see where I'm heading with this.

From everything you tell us, you have tried to negotiate in good faith with these people. That doesn't seem good enough for them and they want to demonstrate this by violating the fdcpa.

If I were in your situation, I would be ready to start playing hard ball! I would be checking www.naca.net and locating an attorney in my area that specializes in FDCPA violations. Attorney collection agencies can be sued for FDCPA violations just as "regular" CA's can. I might start thinking about going that route.

That's just what I would do. I'm curious to see what others think about this situation.


lrhall41

Submitted by FloridaRon on Mon, 03/10/2008 - 09:46

( Posts: 1190 | Credits: )


You know, I'm just amazed at what CA's think when they start calling relatives and leaving messages. Especially when they have your CORRECT home phone number, as it has not been changed in several years! I had a CA call my mother's house the other day, leaving a long message on her answering machine for me advising they were an attorney's office and I needed to call them ASAP. I looked in my caller ID and saw their number in it, as they called my phone number at about the same time (like within two minutes of each other) yet they left the message on my mother's phone number and not one on my phone. So they knew they had my correct phone number, so I don't understand why they called my mother's house! My mother does not need to know all my personal business, nor does she need to be harassed by a CA when they have my correct contact information!

I think it important to note, this was the very first communication I have had from them also, other than the letter in the mail I got the day before the call. So it's not like I was avoiding their phone calls as they only called once.

Needless to say, I sent a DV letter and in it I put my first fdcpa violation warning to them. Once could be an honest mistake; however, if they do it again, then they are indicating to me they have a clear disregard for the law.


lrhall41

Submitted by FloridaRon on Sun, 04/13/2008 - 12:26

( Posts: 1190 | Credits: )