logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Difference between legal and illegal loans

Date: Wed, 05/21/2008 - 07:33

Submitted by goudah2424
on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 07:33

Posts: 7935 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 33


I've been noticing a lot of people seem to be fighting their loans the same, regardless of if they are legal or illegal.

This could have some bad reprucusions . . . . The loans that are legal could use the court system to collect. Illegal loans could never win a judgement, unless you ignored it.

When you are dealing with a legal internet company, you have a lot more channels to go through if there's a problem then with illegal companies.

If you need to revoke your ACH authorization, just send them a letter. They will not continue to debit your account. If they did, they could lose their license. Legal companies will usually follow the law to the T. They are not like illegal companies who will not stop until forced. You shouldn't ever be contacting the processor unless you have ALREADY revoked authorization with the company, and they are continuing to debit. It should not be the first step, it should only done after you've given the company a chance to do the right thing. Otherwise, the processors will soon stop helping because they are getting complaints about companies that can prove they've never even been contacted about the problem.

This is my thing - I want all companies to follow the laws - Each state's laws. I will not condone punishing companies that do follow the laws. I don't beleive in sabotaging companies that are following every law, when it's obvious they could get away with not doing so. These companies should be looked at differently then the illegal ones.

They need to be dealt with completely differnetly then illegal ones.


exactly,the one legal storefront of mine.ALL CREDIT LENDERS,yes they took a garnishment against me because i couldn't invoke the EPP.my income wasn't enough to do it at the time.all credit tried to work with what i could pay but chose to garnish,i didn't fight it.that is the only one that acted reasonably and legally.


lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 07:40

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


Another thing - When the lender is licensed, your state's regulatory authority has options to make them comply with the law if they aren't. It's illegal companies they have more trouble with.

With legal companies you have many avenues to go down if the company does something they shouldn't. It's the total oppsoite of the illegal companies.


lrhall41

Submitted by goudah2424 on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 07:43

( Posts: 7935 | Credits: )


Are any of these legal? I have not contacted ACH processors, but I have sent form letter to each that I have overpaid. I live in Massachusetts, where would I find them listed?
Cash Direct
Cash First
Arrowhead
Total Lending
Loan Shop
Loan Point
500 Fast Cash
One Click
CTC
ameriloan
Cash Net/NLS
M1Y
My Paycheck


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 07:58

( Posts: | Credits: )


I haven't checked, but by looking at those company names I'd venture the guess that none of them are licensed.

Another thing - You have to be careful when searching for a license. Sometimes it's under another name, like the companies corporate name. And sometimes companies are CSO's, not pdl's, and then they don't need a license, only a registration with the Sec of State.


lrhall41

Submitted by goudah2424 on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 08:06

( Posts: 7935 | Credits: )


I just spoke with the Central Regional Supervisor of the Department of Financing, she referred me to the consumer division and I left a message. I'm becoming confused about what type of license is actually required to lend IPDL in Ohio myself. I understood that as long as an IPDL had a license, they could loan to Ohio residents, looks like I may be wrong! Sorry guys if I've given out the wrong information, but for my own peace of mind I am checking with the Dept of Financing. lol :?


lrhall41

Submitted by Shazzers on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 08:59

( Posts: 17344 | Credits: )


Goudah is right about the processors. They are a means to stop companies that refuse to acknowledge your right to revoke authorization. However, with certain repeat offenders I would suggest revoking authorization and copying the processor. That way, if they do not respect it, your methods were well documented. That does not mean call the processor and expect them to bully a PDL into a PIF. Copying them as well will also make them more likely to comply and not ignore you. Just a thought.
I think it's correct to say that the problems are the illegal lenders, not the legal ones. With them, anything goes. Protect yourself accordingly.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 09:20

( Posts: | Credits: )


The Department of Finances just returned my call and this is what was told to me. Ohio residents can't be prosecuted by any Internet lender which does not hold a license in Ohio. They only regulate IPDL's who have a license in Ohio. I just wanted to hear it from the horses mouth. lol It's so easy to become confused about what is or isn't legal, etc. :?


lrhall41

Submitted by Shazzers on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 11:07

( Posts: 17344 | Credits: )


goudah. . I don't necessarily agree with not contacting the processors if the PDL is honoring the revocation. I had revoked, they were not debiting, but I didn't want to take any changes that they would at any given time. I wanted to take that power away from an organization and be in control of my own money. In fact, once I closed my account in February, I notified all my "legal" ACH's that my account was closed and I was not going to re-establish direct debiting on my new account. I now process through my own bank with them sending payments out of my account directly to the company that I want paid. An ACH revocation is on a volunteer basis and can be revoked at any time for any reason. There are other ways of making payments and that would be perfectly acceptable in repayment of a debt. Why tempt fate if you have an effective way of controlling it? I will, in all probability, never give free reign of my money, via my bank account, to anyone in the future. I see it as an extra measure, be it a legal or illegal debt.


lrhall41

Submitted by llw1995 on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 16:24

( Posts: 1422 | Credits: )


momw22000:
Quote:

I need help with this. I don't know what steps to take next. They keep telling me that the extension fees mean nothing as far as what i have paid so far.


Lisa, would you mind starting a thread so it won't be so confusing, then all your information will be in one place. We will help you the best way we can. :)


lrhall41

Submitted by Shazzers on Wed, 05/21/2008 - 16:49

( Posts: 17344 | Credits: )


I don't agree that you should punish a company that is doing what you ask. I feel that you should give them the chance to do the right thing, and if they don't, then contact the processor.

I feel it's playing dirty when you are dealing with a legal company that is doing everything it should under the law.


lrhall41

Submitted by goudah2424 on Thu, 05/22/2008 - 07:06

( Posts: 7935 | Credits: )


goudah . . .I did't have any legal PDLs as I am in New York. Like I stated in another post, I was told by the NY AG that prohibited was prohibited and I should move forward with my complaints. Are the legal PDLs charging a comparable interest amount or do they also have high interest rates? That is where my concern would lie.


lrhall41

Submitted by llw1995 on Thu, 05/22/2008 - 08:36

( Posts: 1422 | Credits: )


Right - I was just talking in general with legal companies. Legal companies will usually do what the law says and stop debiting when you tell them.

There are legal pdl's that charge a ton of interest. Some state's have no caps on the interest rate, so in those states the pdl's could charge whatever they wanted to legally.


lrhall41

Submitted by goudah2424 on Thu, 05/22/2008 - 08:44

( Posts: 7935 | Credits: )