Need advice on suing CA for FDCPA violations......
Date: Wed, 06/11/2008 - 13:24
I guess what else I am trying to say is that enough proof, the v
I guess what else I am trying to say is that enough proof, the voicemails? They are clear as day and she calls out that she is from the Law Office of Norman G. Kalina and then gives you a number to call back and it is ACA Recovery, Inc.
Make sure that those recordings are admissible in a court of law
Make sure that those recordings are admissible in a court of law, for your state, or do you already have that information? If so, seems to me that would be more than enough evidence, however, all the information you can provide is always advisable. Perhaps someone with more knowledge on this subject shortly to advise. :)
The voice mail would be a recording where the other party is pri
The voice mail would be a recording where the other party is privy to the knowledge they are being recorded as they know it is a voice mail. If this Kalina person does not work within the same office as ACA as a retained attorney then the original poster probably has cause for civil action.
DISPUTE and get VALIDATION
Can these idiots show proof that you owe the not the original creditor????? Does the collection agency have "legal assignment" of the original debt????? I bet not!!! Do not ever give a debt collection company money under no circumstances
You do not have to prove anything to the debt collector. It is the other way around.
Removed by Shazzers
Reason: No solicitating permitted, against TOS rules.