Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Validating debt in Texas

Date: Thu, 06/12/2008 - 11:41

Submitted by anonymous
on Thu, 06/12/2008 - 11:41

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 12


How is the validation process different in texas as opposed to other states? I think I read that in texas, the collection agencies MUST reply in some way or form within 30 days if validation is requested.

My quesiton is: what happens if they dont reply?


I don't know what your process is, Das Boot, :)
but it all depends on your state law. If you're just going by the fdcpa, then use that. If they don't respond with honor, that's how you start creating your case to (a) sue them, or (b) respond if they sue you.

What's your situation? I have a little experience making DC's go away, if you wanna PM me I can share

If they don't reply? You're home free, alleged debt-wise. sometimes it just gets sold to another DC


lrhall41

Submitted by mudskipper3 on Thu, 06/12/2008 - 15:43

( Posts: 7 | Credits: )


Hmm, I did not reference Texas Finance Code in my initial DV letter because I was not aware it was stronger than the fdcpa and used a template I received from this site. :(

Would I need to have mentioned it in my DV letter for them to be bound by it? Or does it just make me look a bit scarier to mess with? lol

I know that the fdcpa does not give a time frame in which a CA must respond with DV information, but when I looked up the TFC it states:

"Not later than the 30th day after the date a notice of
inaccuracy is received, a third-party debt collector who initiates
an investigation shall send a written statement to the individual:
(1)denying the inaccuracy;
(2)admitting the inaccuracy; or
(3)stating that the third-party debt collector has
not had sufficient time to complete an investigation of the
inaccuracy."

Seeing that it says not later than the 30th day, if I do not hear anything from the collection agencies within said 30 days, does that completely invalidate the debt? Could they come back in a month or so and say "oh look what we found!"?


lrhall41

Submitted by on Fri, 06/13/2008 - 08:18

( Posts: | Credits: )


Sorry Cajun, I guess im confused.

Why do I have to send another letter explaining the TFC? Just because I dont mention this law doesnt make the CA exempt from abiding by it correct?

Ignorance of the law is not exactly the best defense and I dont see why I should be informing a CA of the laws of my state.

Im not fighting with ya, just curious :)


lrhall41

Submitted by on Fri, 06/13/2008 - 11:45

( Posts: | Credits: )


Yet another question... per the TFC, it says:

If the third-party debt collector states that there has not been sufficient time to complete an investigation, the third-party debt collector shall immediately:
(1) change the item in the relevant file as requested by the individual;
(2) send to each person who previously received the report containing the information a notice that is equivalent to a
notice under Subsection (c) and a copy of the changed report; and
(3) cease collection efforts


Is this essentially saying the debt is invalid? I could not find a point in the TFC where it says that they could validate it at a later time, jsut that the change must be noted and collection efforts ceased.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 06/19/2008 - 13:49

( Posts: | Credits: )