Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Cease and Desist Letter

Date: Sun, 07/27/2008 - 17:21

Submitted by anonymous
on Sun, 07/27/2008 - 17:21

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 12


If I send a C&D letter to the CA's, and send a copy to the OC(they have charged off, but not sold the accounts) saying that I will only settle with them(reason I didn't initially because I was working through a debt settlement company who didn't to their job), what are the chances the OC will pull the accounts back?


If you intend on settling with them you may not want to send a cease and desist letter because you cut the line of communication off and like Nascar said they could just sue you out of spite. You are dealing with a fair amount of debt and no reason to provoke a lawsuit. I would suggest that if you intend on settling with them send a DV letter and once they validate the debt contact them by phone and work some sort of settlement arrangement out.


lrhall41

Submitted by mobile0311 on Mon, 07/28/2008 - 07:26

( Posts: 1817 | Credits: )


If you send a C and D letter to a CA they will continue to send you letters to settle by mail with offers and even prizes if you pay them enough. CAs rarely sue. There are many who threaten to sue but few who follow up on it. They are after the easy money. Most CAs are cube farms with dozens of collectors with hundreds of cases. They work on commisison.


lrhall41

Submitted by Frogpatch on Mon, 07/28/2008 - 11:44

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )


In this case, I think they'll try to sue as the amount of money involved is pretty big. But debt validation will kill them off right away or make them do what they intended to do all along.

I'd say let them try and sue and then let them try and validate the debt in front of the judge. You of course have to file discovery motions before the trial and that may stop it dead if they don't have the right docs.

Quote:

CAs rarely sue. There are many who threaten to sue but few who follow up on it. They are after the easy money. Most CAs are cube farms with dozens of collectors with hundreds of cases. They work on commisison.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 07/31/2008 - 01:05

( Posts: | Credits: )


If the OC still owns the accounts, I wouldn't gamble on them not being able to produce every scrap of paper that pertains to your accounts in court. In the world we live in with electronic storage measured in Terabytes and warehouse after warehouse filled with hard copies, you can bet they still have access to those documents. Now if you were dealing with a 2nd or 3rd JDB, chain of custody would likely be limited to a manilla folder with your name and amount on it. With a debt this fresh, I think settling is the best option.


lrhall41

Submitted by NASCAR_Devil on Thu, 07/31/2008 - 03:59

( Posts: 4671 | Credits: )


Nascar is right about easy access to all the proof they need as long as this wasn't ID theft or something. Since you are basically still dealing with the OC and the CA that collects specifically for them then they would have access to all those documents. Banks tend to keep those documents for years. As an example I had an issue with 5th 3rd bank over a transaction that had occured in 1996. I didn't become aware of the issue until something like 2002. It took a lot of forceful communication on my part but I eventually forced them to pull all the statements that were generated in 1996 in order to prove that they made a mistake. It took them a while but they did have everything archived.

I can't remember the exact numbers anymore but 5th 3rd bank was trying to collect something like $500.14 from me for an account that supposedly was overdrawn. I specifically went into the bank and closed the account with a zero balance since I was moving out of town. Since I moved they could not locate me to inform me that the account was supposedly overdrawn. I got a call from a collector on the account years later. After forcing them to do all the research it was obvious what happend. For some reason the bank charged me 14 cents after the account was closed. They then proceeded to tag me with months and months of fees. Stupid 5th 3rd. Anyway I got them to reverse eveything but it took me about 3 months of arguing to do it. Of course they insisted that I owed them the 500.14. I told them if they could not prove it then I would pay nothing. Finally I got them to pull the records which settled everything.


lrhall41

Submitted by DOLLARSandSINCE on Thu, 07/31/2008 - 08:23

( Posts: 1078 | Credits: )