logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Correspondence from Mel S Harris

Date: Thu, 11/06/2008 - 14:43

Submitted by ddstratton
on Thu, 11/06/2008 - 14:43

Posts: 6 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 5


I had received a summons to court from Mel S. Harris and Associates, representing Pinpoint Technologies, for a debt that I honestly do not believe is valid. I had previously sent a debt validation letter, and sent another copy to Pinpoint, Mel S Harris, and the court. I heard nothing for quite some time. A few days ago, I received a notice from the court that a pre-trial conference had been scheduled for December. Then today, I get a letter from Mel S. Harris stating that this is a Stipulation of Discontinuance, "without prejudice, and without cost to either party as against the other", and that I should also file a copy with the courts, as well as them doing so.

Does this mean that once this is filed, that the court suit is dropped? It's what it sounds like to me, but I'm a bit confused. I still have not received debt validation, by the way.


[size=6]to the best of my knowledge and i have done the research, PINPOINT is NOT licensed in the city of new york to collect debt. this is very very important and could have your case dismissed. do all the research and file a compaint with the NYC licensing website (i did) and document it. then ask the judge to dismiss with prejudice.

then threaten to sue all of them - SMELL HARRISS and PINPRICK, do your homework, talk to NEDAP consumer hotline and don't quit until these two miscreant companies have a giant bite out of their ****. they are very very evil, freeze money, lie, ruin lives, misrepresent facts in COMPLAINTS, and almost never ever have the documentation to back up their legal claims.

don't pay your money so their wives can wear designer clothing!!!
[color=DarkBlue][/color][/size]

[color=Red]****Adult term removed - Jason[/color]


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 11/19/2008 - 21:23

( Posts: | Credits: )


Answer to your question is there's no guaranty it will go completely way and here's why. When a court case is dismissed, or a court order is issued, "without prejudice", it means that a new case may be brought or a new order issued on the same basis as the dismissed case or the original order.
A "stipulation" is sign by all parties and means that ALL parties are in agreement on whatever is being stipulated to. Therefore, you would be agreeing with the opposing party that they can come after you in the future. You want the stipulation to say "with prejudice" because that will prevent the opposing party from bringing another action on the same claim.


lrhall41

Submitted by whystimpy on Fri, 11/21/2008 - 10:17

( Posts: 15 | Credits: )


Are they in the same state as you?If not,ignore them,they must sue you in the state you live in,or in Federal court.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 07/05/2010 - 19:11

( Posts: | Credits: )


If The Stipulation states "the attorneys for all parties to the above entitled action, that wheras no party hereto is an infant, incompetent person for whom a committee has been appointed or conservatee and no person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the action, the above entitled action and be, and the same hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party as against the other. The stipulation my be filed without notice with the county clerk." I receivd this in regards to a 24,000 credit card debt in the State of New York. I was served by the original credit card attorneys, I had my Credit Counseling Company try to settle for less than 50%, I do not have much, they would not settle. A few months later I got a letter stating that the attorneys changed from the original credit card attorneys to a seperate lawfirm from a collection agency. I was told to challenge all the fees and charges, which I filed twice, and then just a week ago I got this STIPULATION OF DISCONTINUING ACTION. It states on the cover letter that The IRS requires the credit card company to provide information about certain amounts that are discharged as a result of a cancellation of a debt on a from 1099.
This charge is under my name only, I work only 20 hours a week, and have no assets. My husband has stage 4 cancer and we have had to pay for his medical. I asked my credit conseling company, and they seem to think this will be dismissed due to the wording. But I won't know for sure until I get a 1099 in the mail next year. What do you thin is going on with this. I signed it and sent it back registered mail, could it be that they thought twice and being that I live in NY they can only garnish a part-time employee 10% and that I just didnot have anything so they will drop it?? What do you think I should do or what do you think is happening??? HELP


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 05/25/2011 - 20:05

( Posts: | Credits: )