logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Chase Filed Suit

Date: Sat, 12/20/2008 - 20:05

Submitted by bebeisis
on Sat, 12/20/2008 - 20:05

Posts: 9 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 14


I received the summons today. I have 30 days to answer. I checked my file and the amount that I am being sued for is correct. The collection agency/attorney handling the suit is none other than MANN BRACKEN. I called their office in April 2008 to make payment arrangements. I couldn't pay the amount the wanted me to pay. I was not working then and I am still not working. If I don't enter into a consent judgement and I have to appear in court, will I need an attorney to represent me? I will need the website where I can find one at no or very low fee.

Your feedback is appreciated.


to Bebeisis: would you mind if I ask you what was the time frame that they filed suit against you from the last payment you made to them. I owe them a lot and everyday the mail comes I expect to see bad news. Thank you


lrhall41

Submitted by on Sat, 12/20/2008 - 23:13

( Posts: | Credits: )


you don't need an attorney to represent you though it would'nt hurt either. If the Mann Bracken attorney shows up, they'll probably just try to pressure you to settle first and if you don't have an attorney with you, they might even try to take advantage of you. Otherwise, if you aren't going to dispute it, just show up and own up to it then they'll get the judgment and start that process of trying to recover it.

After my judgment hearing, they put a hold on my checking account until I came to testify about my assets. They can do that, too before they even notify you about the hearing.


lrhall41

Submitted by ndmike25 on Sun, 12/21/2008 - 06:50

( Posts: 88 | Credits: )


The first thing you need to do is call the court house to find out if everything is actually filed. If the debt is within the SoL you may want to contact legal aide to find out what options you have when you go to court. You will need to bring all of your finance issues to court because the judge will set a payment plan that should be managable and they will have to accept that.

If they filed the suite with the debt past the SoL you will be able to get it dismissed.


lrhall41

Submitted by FYI on Sun, 12/21/2008 - 07:33

( Posts: 1950 | Credits: )


The last payment made was June 2007 so I don't think is past the SOL. I did sent them a DV letter in a timely matter and the responded in a timely matter.


lrhall41

Submitted by bebeisis on Sun, 12/21/2008 - 09:04

( Posts: 9 | Credits: )


The last payment made was June 2007. I didn't get a letter from Mann Bracken until January 28, 2008. I spoke with someone at their office in Aapril 2008. The summons arrived December 20, 2008. I hope that helps.


lrhall41

Submitted by bebeisis on Sun, 12/21/2008 - 09:07

( Posts: 9 | Credits: )


Was the payment made to Mann/Bracken or the original creditor? You say they responded to the DV letter in a timely manner? Did they provide proper validation, was there documentation proving this debt is yours and that they now own the debt? I can tell you that they are notorious for providing affidavits as validation which is NOT proper validation, it's hearsay unless it is from the original creditor.


lrhall41

Submitted by Shazzers on Sun, 12/21/2008 - 09:42

( Posts: 17344 | Credits: )


Was this for a credit card debt?


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 12/22/2008 - 12:56

( Posts: | Credits: )


My suggestion would be to talk to legal aide and find out what your options will be once you get to court. As long as they have the valid paper work they will be able to get a judgements. You will need to bring all details pertaning to your financial situation because the judge will set a payment plan that you and they will have to abide by.


lrhall41

Submitted by FYI on Mon, 12/22/2008 - 18:21

( Posts: 1950 | Credits: )


Can a lawyer refuse an offer to pay them for a debt on a monthy basis and and file a garnishment?


lrhall41

Submitted by on Tue, 01/06/2009 - 15:24

( Posts: | Credits: )


I have talked to someone at Mann Bracken and we're close to coming to a payment arrangement, however I refuse to agree to the amount that I can't pay monthly because I am not working. I advised him of that. I spoke with a lawyer from NACA, and he said that if I go to court the Judge does not dictate how much my payment will be. I also have read somewhere that the Judge will have a say in what my monthly payment will be depending on my finances, ect. Can anyone clear up this confusion?


lrhall41

Submitted by bebeisis on Fri, 01/09/2009 - 08:22

( Posts: 9 | Credits: )