Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

How it really should be in debt collection

Date: Sun, 12/04/2005 - 09:57

Submitted by anonymous
on Sun, 12/04/2005 - 09:57

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 44


Good morning everybody,

As I read the posts, I read a lot of horror stories about collectors who are committing numerous fdcpa don'ts. Why, I will never even try to understand. What made me a successful and well liked collector is certainly missing in all these cases. Allow me to share with all of you, the whole collections process through my eyes, how I realy think it should be.

I have always approached borrowers with an open mind. I don't know them, or what is happening with them, therefore the tone I take with them is neutral, calm, and unassuming. I have learned that being in debt does not make one stupid, I have in fact spoken with some very fascinating individuals with impressive lives and really cool jobs.

When talking to people at work, which is legal twice a month unless otherwise specified, never cop an attitude with them. They are at work, where there is already enough pressure surrounding them.

Suggesting a payment paln to a borrower can be a lot like sales, it does take a little finesse. I've found it beneficial to offer an array of suggestions, and then step off. It felt really satisfying on my end to sort of renew the borrowers' confidence by allowing some aspects of the resolution to be their idea. I also found it unnecessary to speak of consequences unless the borrower was resistant.

The bottom line is, I myself get upset when others approach me in a condescending manner and talk to me like I'm stupid, therefore I will not do that to others. The best qualitites of successful collectors are an open mind, empathy, a postitive attitude, and a realistic mind.

This is the way it should be.

God bless,

Ari


Quote:


When talking to people at work, which is legal twice a month unless otherwise specified,


there are only a few states which regulate how often you can call a debtor at their place of employment. almost all states allow collectors to call work as often as needed. and there is nothing in the fdcps laws which regulate contacts at work.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Sun, 12/04/2005 - 18:32

( Posts: | Credits: )


KP,

Yes, it is regulated in the fdcpa that calls to places of employment be kept to a bare minimum or a need basis. People can rarely accept calls of a personal nature where they work, it can get them fired.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Sun, 12/04/2005 - 20:28

( Posts: | Credits: )


Quote:

But, can they still call after you send a cease letter telling them not to call your home or work and request for written correspondence only?
thanks, shirley


most collection agencies will not correspond through a written means only. most likely, all collection activity will have ceased once you send a written c&d within 30 days of receiving their collection notice. and yes, they are allowed to contact you once more after they have received your c&d - only to notify you that collection has stopped against, and to notify you if legal action will be taken against.

keep in mind, a c&d only stop collection activity from that particular collection agency.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 12/05/2005 - 05:22

( Posts: | Credits: )


KP,

I don't know which section of it states that, I didn't read it word for word, but I did take a week-long class on it and every day after that, guidelines of it were ingrained in my head by managers on a daily basis.

Perhaps it's not exactly a law, but it is consideration because people do get fired if they allow themselves to be interrupted at work with personal calls.

Since the common goal is to recover funds for our clients, it is very destructive to get debtors fired, isn't it?


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 12/05/2005 - 05:51

( Posts: | Credits: )


ari, maybe it is a company policy which you heard about, or just common courtesy like you just said.

however, nothing in the fdcpa mentions calls to a debtor's poe. there are only just a COUPLE of states which have laws stating how frequent you can call a poe, all other states do not regulate at all.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 12/05/2005 - 05:54

( Posts: | Credits: )


Dear KP,

Part of my collections philosophy is not just about laws, it's also about concience. There have been instances where I just felt it was inappropriate to be on the phone with someone. For instance, an account came to me in the autodialer, and as i studied the account while waiting for the debtor, I read that she'd had recent surgery. When she finally came to the phone, she sounded deathly weak. I could not continue the conversation because she was in no state to discuss her money problems at that moment. I also got an account in the autodialer where the debtor answered, I could hear water running, and she said she was in the shower. I offered to call later because I felt that talking to a naked debtor was awkward.

These are just personal morals of mine, that there is a time and place for collections activities and those times and places should be meticulously selected. The more one tightens their grip, the faster their success slips away.

[color=Red]****Adult term removed - Jason[/color]


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 12/05/2005 - 08:13

( Posts: | Credits: )


Ari, KP

The debt collection industry really needs people like you. These aesthetical values followed by you can still make the collection industry look good in front of the consumers. But the sad part of the story is that nowadays, a majority of people in collection industry now go after money rather than values.

Your firm will never have a bad name because people like you are responsible in growing the company's name and wipe off the bad practices faced by most of the consumers.


lrhall41

Submitted by ben on Mon, 12/05/2005 - 10:54

( Posts: 2034 | Credits: )


Dear Ben,

Thank you for your kind words. I love people, I enjoy helping them and restoring their confidence. As long as this forum exists, I will be there. even long after I recieve my degree and go into the Marketing industry, my caring will never cease.

Best,
Ari


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 12/05/2005 - 14:02

( Posts: | Credits: )


Hi everyone,

I'm proud to announce that I've just been knighted! Actually, just an official samaritan now. :D

Now, anyone who needs immediate answers or assistance can send me an e-mail or an IM anytime!


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Mon, 12/05/2005 - 18:23

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


ari, i agree debt collectors really should have a good sense of what is right and wrong, despite what the laws state. i, however, also like to make the people aware of the laws, even if the laws do allow for some things people may tend to think of as 'harassing' or 'threatening'.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 12/05/2005 - 19:47

( Posts: | Credits: )


Congradulations Ari and welcome aboard!!! We'll look forward to seeing more of you around here!!! Its nice to have someone from the 'inside' that might be able to help us get a different perspective on things. My name is shirley and I'm the drama queen in the group. LOL! No, actually, I'm kidding, but I say this because I always seem to have alot going on. But this group has been right there for me, helping me deal head on with my different problems. I get through one, and two more are waiting on the side. But I have learned alot and am stronger for it. Anyways, its nice to meet you and we look forward to hearing some of your input on things. :) And getting to know you better. Shirley


lrhall41

Submitted by imkimssister on Mon, 12/05/2005 - 20:05

( Posts: 1301 | Credits: )


Dear Shirley,

Getting through one problem and having two more on the side is something everyone deals with! That's just the rigors of survival. While everyone's problems are different, that's still the general pattern of dealing with life. Get through one then take on the ones on the side. You're not alone. :)


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Tue, 12/06/2005 - 06:54

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


Title 15, Chapter 41, Subchapter 1692c does not say how many times you can call but does say the following:

(a) Communication with the consumer generally
Without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector or the express permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, a debt collector may not communicate with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt???
(1) at any unusual time or place or a time or place known or which should be known to be inconvenient to the consumer. In the absence of knowledge of circumstances to the contrary, a debt collector shall assume that the convenient time for communicating with a consumer is after 8 o'clock antemeridian and before 9 o'clock postmeridian, local time at the consumer's location;
(2) if the debt collector knows the consumer is represented by an attorney with respect to such debt and has knowledge of, or can readily ascertain, such attorney's name and address, unless the attorney fails to respond within a reasonable period of time to a communication from the debt collector or unless the attorney consents to direct communication with the consumer; or
(3) at the consumer's place of employment if the debt collector knows or has reason to know that the consumer's employer prohibits the consumer from receiving such communication.

Source: http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fdcpa/fdcpact.htm


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 12/07/2005 - 12:04

( Posts: | Credits: )


Of course they can't hide! However, how they are approached by us will determine how much they can be helped by us. You can be well within the fdcpa and still be precieved by a borrower as a jackass.
I called this one lady one time, she'd previously had her head bitten off by one of my former coworkers. She politely said she would respond by mail within thirty days, just as the collection letter said she could. I told her I was there to help, but the way my former coworker treated her turned her off to taking calls, even mine. She repeated her intent to respond by mail, all I could really do to help her was step off.
That's what I meant when I said that the more you tighten your grip, the faster you lose control. I take pride in certain accounts I worked because borrowers have thanked me for my patience and my help, I also gave them the time and space they needed to look at their budget and figure out how to fit in their rehab payments.
All good things to those who wait.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Fri, 12/09/2005 - 17:58

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


On the other hand, some people want a war! I came across one account in an autodialer, as I waited for her to come to the phone I reviewed her account and history of correspondence, turns out she'd been refusing to pay and demanding to be litigated from the get-go. I also saw in the special notes that she'd had a recnet surgery to remove cancerous tissue. I knew I had to walk softly.
When she came to the phone, I took a moment to mention the surgery and ask how she was feeling. After she reported that she was fine, I got down to business. I didn't play dumb, I just came out and asked her what she was hoping to gain by letting teh account go to litigation. It turns out she was disputing not only the balance, but past collector behavior. She would not agree to a discretionary compromise, and she detailed some ludicrous behavior coming from past collectors. She told me that if I would please forward her account to the legal department it would be a big help!
I thought to myself "Is this chick for real? She's got cojones wantingt o take on the USDOE!"
But all I said to her was "as you wish."


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Fri, 12/09/2005 - 18:40

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


Absolutely! Student loans are government money! Bankruptcy will never eradicate a debt to the government. You know what else? And I hope Mom of Twins read this. Even failure to repay government money is not punishable by imprisonment! The worst punishments for failure to repay a student loan are garnishments, suspension of preofessional licenses for deadbeat doctors and lawyers, and litigations of accounts which means nothing more than balance in full, no compromise or waiver of collection fees.

The ONLY debt that is punishable by imprisonment is tax evasion. For the record.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Fri, 12/09/2005 - 18:59

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


That's right! What do you collect? By the way, i just read your introduction in the pub forum. I agree with you completely, many of these debtors are scaredand they need our help. I too would go for a fast payment plan over a slow balance in full any day. Above all, these "collectors" that everyone is complaning about who are breaking the laws are a real embarassment to us.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Fri, 12/09/2005 - 19:31

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


To Ari and Matt

Reading your posts, the community will get a new dimension about collection industry. And it is obvious that you both actually do fair collections.

But tell me, do you see other collectors by your side who tend to put a bad name to this industry? Don't you get shaken when you hear someone sitting next to you making this rude call?


lrhall41

Submitted by roxette on Sat, 12/10/2005 - 09:35

( Posts: 4009 | Credits: )


Not me, Roxette. The company I worked for were and still are fdcpa sticklers. After all, their clients were only Fortune 500 companies. Department of Education, Providian, Cingular, AT&T, DirectTV, Healthcare, all clients we could not afford to embarass with childish tantrums and nonsense words directed at people who were once their valued customers.
Never have I sat next to a violator. However, as I became a more seasoned collector, I would see the new hires come in and i would soon be able to tell which ones would make it and which would not.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Sat, 12/10/2005 - 09:44

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


Quote:

Not me, Roxette. The company I worked for were and still are fdcpa sticklers. After all, their clients were only Fortune 500 companies. Department of Education, Providian, Cingular, AT&T, DirectTV, Healthcare, all clients we could not afford to embarass with childish tantrums and nonsense words directed at people who were once their valued customers.
Never have I sat next to a violator. However, as I became a more seasoned collector, I would see the new hires come in and i would soon be able to tell which ones would make it and which would not.


Ari. I enjoy reading your posts. I have found them to be quite informative and interesting. You obviously have a caring and compassionate side which is evident in your posts. They have even given me some hope there are other decent people like yourself and Matt out there in the collections business.

However, I do have to take a little exception, with at least two of the clients you listed, Providian and Cingular.

Prior to filing bankruptcy in 1997 (a mistake I will never make again), I was having a lot of problems with Providian. The people calling from Providian were extremely arrogant and subject to tantrums and yelling if they didn't hear what they wanted to hear. They even continued to call after filing BK and were provided with the number for my attorney. Additionally, my wife had an account with Providian before we were married. My wife was trying to make an arrangement and pay it off. When she finally arrive at an acceptable arrangement, Providian sold the account to Aspire, who refused to honor the agreement which Providian had made.

Additionally, A FOIA request on another agency, Superior Asset, revealed a large number of complaints against both Superior and Cingular for violations of the FDCPA.


lrhall41

Submitted by LCW on Sat, 12/10/2005 - 13:10

( Posts: 1151 | Credits: )


Quote:

But tell me, do you see other collectors by your side who tend to put a bad name to this industry? Don't you get shaken when you hear someone sitting next to you making this rude call?


well, being rude isn't against federal or state law. luckily there aren't any collectors in my department who intentionally break fdcpa laws. if anything, it's usually a newbie who makes a dumb mistake that turns out to be harmless. although, i will admit almost all collectors i know will walk right up to the thin blue line and peer over it once in a while.


lrhall41

Submitted by CollectorMatt on Sat, 12/10/2005 - 13:42

( Posts: 95 | Credits: )


I just ran into something at the new agency I work at here in Pensacola. I've read some posts in this forum about debt re-aging, and I've come across an account today, a past due payday loan in a relatively small amount, that was maybe a year and a half old if memory serves me correctly. Anyway, as I spoke to the borrower she told me she had paid it off, twice. FOr the first time she admitted to the embarassing blunder of bouncing a check, but then she went to Cashland and paid off the loan in cash. Willing to accept the truth instead of money in a situation like this, I gave her my company phone and fax and advised her to send proof of payment. I certainly hope that if she is being truthful, and this is not just a remaining balance that she missed, that this is just a clerical error on behalf of the client. It won't look good if my agency is inadvertently doing business with dishonest clients.
This is a new thing I'm starting to suspect. It may not be the collection agency doing bad business, but they may not realize that they have a contract with a dishonest client. My new place of employment, Protocol, are good people, but are a small agency and contract with retailers, credit cards, banks, and pawnshops. I hope that there isn't one bad seed in there that could poison us.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Wed, 12/21/2005 - 17:09

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


Attention everybody! I never believed this to be true, but it is! Payday loans! You write a postdated check to a pawnshop in exchange for cash??!! What are you thinking?? Don't be so desperate! IT CAN BE CONSIDERED A FELONY IN A COURT OF LAW!! Writing a postdated check to a business that inevitably bounces? They've got you on a sticky wicket! You guys, I would never! I would prefer to do without that have this nightmare! Vampires are real! We all need to steel ourselves!


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Wed, 01/18/2006 - 19:02

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


Loan sharks is what they are, and thats putting it mildly. And its a vicious cycle that once you get into it, it's hard to break! I have never done this but my brother in law does it all the time. He writes the advance payday loan checks, plus has done the car title loans. He's lost two cars doing this (back to back just a few months apart). And has a car now, that he's about to lose because he's behind on the title payments. The sad thing about it is, its his dead sisters car that she left for her son. Right away, he put the car in his name and took the title to the pawn shop. What makes it worse is, he doesn't even work, he gets a check from the government once a month and its spent before he even gets it.

Another incident, my husband worked with a man that pawned his car title and got behind on the payments. The repo man came out, started loading up the car. He {husbands work buddy} came outside of his house about the time they were driving off. He started chasing repo man with a gun and was shooting. Repo man got out of his truck, shot and killed work buddy. Wife said he was only behind one payment. This was in the news. man is dead, repo man is in no trouble, title loan place has car. I'm not saying work friend was right in what he done, not at all...but people do we really need to put ourselves in these situations?

I have posted about this subject before and this subject just really BURNS me up. People, the loan sharps ARE NOT OUR FRIENDS. repeat after me. THEY'RE NOT OUR FRIENDS. I am convinced this is one of worst things 'financially' going on in America today. I really wish people would think twice and consider their options before going into these loan shark joints. They are feeding on you. They know your luck is down and thats what they do, they take advantage. Do you think they're surprised when you can't pay them back??? no, in fact, they count on it. Nothing good comes from this. You're desperate, you feel you have no other way--you feel pretty good when 'they're helping you' and laying that money on you...then they turn into your worst nightmare. Please friends, think long and hard before getting involved with these people. I'm not judging you if you have, just do whatever it takes to get yourself out from under them.

shirley


lrhall41

Submitted by imkimssister on Wed, 01/18/2006 - 20:50

( Posts: 1301 | Credits: )


That's one hell of a story about your husband's coworker! You are so right in what you are saying. There is absolutely no need for us to stoop to such desperate measures that we find ourselves on the wrong side of the law. I would personally prefer do just do without for a little while. I've had to before and it's not so bad!

They are loan sharks through and through, and what they do is damaging to our economy. If we are to get together and put our country back on it's feet, let us write to our congressmen about this. It really is up to us to think about what is in our best interests as citizens and put that in writing to our lawmakers. That is how democracy works.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Thu, 01/19/2006 - 07:34

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


I just really hope that if nothing else, the people that come into this forum will read and hear the stories behind these loan shark companies and steer clear of them--for their own good! That after reading some of the hardships and heartaches that these places have caused for some of the people here, that they will definitely think twice before going that route. And for the ones that are already have, that they will get out from under it as quickly as possible, while they can before it snowballs and backs them into a corner. shirley


lrhall41

Submitted by imkimssister on Thu, 01/19/2006 - 09:22

( Posts: 1301 | Credits: )