2 Party Recording Rules
Date: Sat, 02/28/2009 - 08:08
Submitted by desperatelyseekingsanity
on
Sat, 02/28/2009 - 08:08
Total Replies: 2
When a CA calls (or you call them) and their phone system says "this call may be recorded, blah, blah, blah...this is considered meeting the disclosure requirement that the call is being recorded.
Obviously that meets the requirements for those state that have the 1 Party Recording Rule...so THEY can tape YOU...
In a state that is a 2 Party Recording state, if this SAME message is disclosed, does this allow BOTH PARTIES to record...ergo...meaning, I don't have to say back to the CA that "I, too, am taping this recording"?
Does any one know if Illinois is a 1 or 2 party state?
Obviously that meets the requirements for those state that have the 1 Party Recording Rule...so THEY can tape YOU...
In a state that is a 2 Party Recording state, if this SAME message is disclosed, does this allow BOTH PARTIES to record...ergo...meaning, I don't have to say back to the CA that "I, too, am taping this recording"?
Does any one know if Illinois is a 1 or 2 party state?
By the CA having that disclosure, it covers both parties. Here
By the CA having that disclosure, it covers both parties. Here is a list of the 2-party states:
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Illinois
Massachusetts
Maryland
Montana
Nevada (as of Jan 1 2008)
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania
Washington
Submitted by desperatelyseekingsanity on Sat, 02/28/2009 - 08:27
( Posts: 1129 | Credits: )