Georgia court hearing against Mann Bracken
Date: Mon, 06/01/2009 - 13:36
Excellent. This is why it is good to file complaints with the st
Excellent. This is why it is good to file complaints with the state Attorney General.
"http://www.statesboro.biz/News/335/Mann-Bracken-s-Illegal-Debt-Collection-in-Georgia-May-Soon-Be-Over.aspx"
See: Mann Bracken In Trouble.
Apparently they have been bought out by Axiant.
Lots more info on Bud Hibbs site:
"http://www.budhibbs.com/collectorpages/wolpoff_abramson.htm"
Manless Brocken , Limited Liabilty Crooks
Five more days and counting for "JUSTICE" to be served on these crooks!
Does anyone know the final ruling on the State of GA v Mann Brac
Does anyone know the final ruling on the State of GA v Mann Bracken in Cobb County, GA?
Mann Bracken has even more class action lawsuits being filed aga
Mann Bracken has even more class action lawsuits being filed against them. Also racketeering charges also in the mix. Look at fivemilliondots.com for details.
Fred Hanna and Thugs are the new crooks in town. Watch out they
Fred Hanna and Thugs are the new crooks in town. Watch out they fabricate evidence and try exparte communications with Judges.
Yep. And the Georgia Supreme Court recently ruled in their favor
Yep. And the Georgia Supreme Court recently ruled in their favor when the Georgia Governor's Office of Consumer Affairs tried to get them to turn over documents revealing their shady debt collection practices:
A recent State of Georgia Appeals Court ruling (STATE v. FREDERICK J. HANNA & ASSOCIATES, P.C.) handed Frederick J. Hanna an (albeit) small victory that prevents the Georgia Office of Consumer Affairs (GA OCA) from obtaining records that may have shown that the debt collection law firm may have abused consumers, violated the Georgia Business Practices Act and the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act".
'The trial court defeated the OCA's attempt to compel the law firm's compliance with its investigative demand by dismissing the lawsuit OCA filed. The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding in part that it was an attempt to regulate the practice of law --- something that is entirely within the jurisdiction of the Georgia Supreme Court to do. This is a technical way to defeat consumer protection. I agree with Justice Melton's dissent, but we are in the minority. I note that this was a 4:3 decision. Not a landslide but, for now at least, the law in this state.' ~ Georgia Consumer Protection Attorney Joseph Segui"http://smarterotti.com/post/2010/06/12/Debt-C ... es-the-War.aspx