Statute of Limitation Question.

It is based on where you currently live.

Thanks for the prompt reply. Maybe I should move to Mississippi to really F' with them. ;)

[Edit]
What's with the inconsistent and (gender) inaccurate avatar images?

lol. The avatars are random. A computer has no idea of your gender, unless you put it on your profile. And even then, there isn't a good way to compare that gender with the gender noted on an avatar and apply accordingly - it's a logistical nightmare. You can select your own avatar since you are a member, go to Edit Profile.

[quote=ChrysHenderson]A computer has no idea of your gender, unless you put it on your profile.[/quote]
Indeed, I was hoping that the gender being set in the profile would have been deduced through my word choice. The forum profile doesn't seem to retain that specific information correctly for some reason.
[quote=ChrysHenderson]And even then, there isn't a good way to compare that gender with the gender noted on an avatar and apply accordingly[/quote]
That's not entirely true. It would be very simple for the forum author (the programmer who created it) to provide a simple conditional. For example: if the profile is marked male: choose images from this directory. If the profile is marked female, choose from another directory. Otherwise, display a default nondescript avatar.

Chances are, since it doesn't seem to be retaining the gender information (and some other ancillary bits), the board isn't configured correctly.


Hmm, there was a rather lengthy fourth post I was going to reply to as well, but it doesn't seem to be here any longer. Was it removed for some reason?

I believe it was a mere copy/paste from another website, which is against the TOS of this forum.

Of course you are correct in your astute explanation.

Ah, protection against plagarism is certainly a good thing. Unless, of course, the poster employed proper quoting standards to acredit the original source --- or would that have still violated the ToS?

It seemed like there was a lot of information, and it could be been pertinent, but now I'll never know.

It was a loooooong quote. The "proper quoting standards" would have been a short synopsis of what a reader could expect to find if they go to that site, and an explanation of why they should. A sentence or 3 that specifically deals with a situation responded to is ok, but generally just copy-pasting an entire page without attribution will likely be construed as a copyright violation should the copyright holder decide to aggressively pursue their rights.

It's not only against the TOS, it's unethical and against copyright laws.

Indeed.

Is there a place to make suggestions concerning the website? Having that flash video play on every-single-page is not beneficial. It should exist solely on an introductory page, or an about section. It wastes system resources having it loaded, and played, everywhere one goes in the site.