creditor trying to fill "agreed judgment entry" for negotiated payment plan
Date: Tue, 09/29/2009 - 08:23
I thought this meant they would drop the lawsuit, but they have sent me a form describing the plan as part of a "Agreed Judgment Entry" they want to file to settle the case.
My downpayment more than brings the account current and the agreed monthly payments are more than those I was previously required to make under the original agreement. Why would they need to enter a judgment against me under these conditions?
I'm assuming this judgment will have a lasting negative impact on my credit report, is that correct? Should I just make the payment to bring the account current and file a response to the suit saying the account is current now? Can they still obtain the judgment anyway?
This type of judgment is not necessarily a bad thing. When a cr
This type of judgment is not necessarily a bad thing. When a creditor views this and see's an agreement for you to repay has been agreed upon many creditors will see this as hard times and like the fact you did agree to settle. The ATTY will drop the case entirely if you pay in full prior to going to court in most cases. In this situation the lawsuit is dropped and basically never happened.
I do think a judgment is a bad thing. I'd answer the summons and
I do think a judgment is a bad thing. I'd answer the summons and then negotiate further.
Is there anything special in the answer I should state about alr
Is there anything special in the answer I should state about already bringing the account current with a payment? Or once it has been filed, even if I pay enough to bring the account current, the judge wont care about that and will grant them a judgment?