Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

How many calls is considered harrassment?

Date: Thu, 01/12/2006 - 13:22

Submitted by anonymous
on Thu, 01/12/2006 - 13:22

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 39


I am getting numerous phone calls on my home and cell phone from a company. I am in the process of sending a debt validation letter and cease phone contact letter. I just received seven phone calls in a 90 minute period. Four phone calls were in a 15 minute period. Is this considered harrassment?


As per the federal laws in the fdcpa, collection agencies are not allowed to call you frequently in a particular day. Section 806(5) prohibits contacting the consumer by telephone "repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number."

Keep a log file of all the calls made to you by the agency. Record the dates and time so that you are in the process of filing a legal case against them. Send a cease and desist letter and make the first legal step to stop their calls. If they persist, you will have more charges of filing a case against them. Send your letter through certified mail with return receipt requested.


lrhall41

Submitted by david on Thu, 01/12/2006 - 14:00

( Posts: 1229 | Credits: )


I have kept a log from which number they call and if it is my home and cell. They have only left one message this whole time. I have sent out a cease letter today certified along with the certified number on the letter. I am covering all my bases. I would like to make payment arrangements with them but after all these phone calls that is going to be done in writing only.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 01/12/2006 - 14:39

( Posts: | Credits: )


It seems as if you got things well under control. It is very smart to keep a log and record what was said and the time the phone calls were placed. Keeping track of the frequency of the calls is also a good idea.

Keep us updated on what happens and let us know if they violate you cease communications letter.


lrhall41

Submitted by benjaminz6 on Thu, 01/12/2006 - 17:06

( Posts: 256 | Credits: )


It is very important that you give your personal information to only those who ensure its safety. Every company must set its privacy policies and safeguard the interests of the consumers. It is sad to know that some companies sell the data to others for making some extra money.


lrhall41

Submitted by david on Fri, 01/13/2006 - 12:31

( Posts: 1229 | Credits: )


1) They have the cell phone number because she provided it to the original creditor as an alternate phone number. eg. "Whats another number where we can reach you?".

2) A phone call is only considered "contact" if somene, even someone besides the consumer, actually answers. If you never answer then its just a ringing phone, not "contacting" someone.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 09:14

( Posts: | Credits: )


I have to go with Robert on this one. If they call 4 times on each phone and no one answers then it would not be considered harassment unless you filed your C&D letters. After you file your letters I think it would be considered harassment even if you did not answer since you specifically requested that they only contact you in writing. You need to cover your bases and you will be set. It would not hurt to keep record of when they call now but it will be more important after you have proof that they received those letters.


lrhall41

Submitted by DOLLARSandSINCE on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 13:34

( Posts: 1078 | Credits: )


calls ringing are not contacts
calls to third parties are not contacts
so if you answer the phone and say you are not you- that is not a contact

as for harrassment, fdcpa describes it pretty vaguely
you cannot tell them to not call, it must be in writing
a good company goes with the verbal request
but it is a number by number basis
don't call me means the number you're being called at; not your alternate contact numbers

a request to not call has to be made by the consumer
a good company will honor the request from a spouse
or not call if it's clear the employer won't put you on the phone

then again, they can get touchy with you and refuse to do so if you don't give them an alternate number
put it in writing is the best practice

perceived harrassment isn't harrassment
harrassment would clearly be that if a reasonable person would agree
you're not the best judge because you're upset when they call
if calls weren't so irritating they wouldn't be so effective


lrhall41

Submitted by on Fri, 06/29/2007 - 19:55

( Posts: | Credits: )


to everyone that has just said a call is not a contact until someone picks up the phone, you all need to go back and re-read the law.

Directly from the FDCPA, under section 806, a collector is guilty if they are--

Quote:

Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.

You will all notice that it does not require the call to be a contact for harassment to have taken place. Let's look at it in simple common sense terms. Lets say you look in the phone book and pick out a number, any number. You call that number at 11:31 am. Again at 11:34 am. Again at 11:38 am. Again at 11:49 am. Again at 12:17 am. You dont even know this person. They can claim harassment for this....and win. It happens, people. Not too long back, a CA was found by a court to be in violation of the FDCPA for calling someone six times in just over a week. I am at this moment dealing with a CA that follows the example I just posted, as many as five calls per day. In about a month's time, they have called more than 80 times. If you dont think that qualifies as harassment, then PLEASE, be the collector that calls me like that again....For all of you that claim "no one answering doesnt count...", better go back and study harder.

Also, not really sure about the third party comment, but the law has something to say about those too...

[quote]Any debt collector communicating with any person other than the consumer for the purpose of acquiring location information about the consumer shall --

(1) identify himself, state that he is confirming or correcting location information concerning the consumer, and, only if expressly requested, identify his employer;

(2) not state that such consumer owes any debt;

(3) not communicate with any such person more than once unless requested to do so by such person or unless the debt collector reasonably believes that the earlier response of such person is erroneous or incomplete and that such person now has correct or complete location information;
[/quote]

Quote:
if calls weren't so irritating they wouldn't be so effective

1--if they really were so effective, we wouldnt see all the CA's that have recently been in bankruptcy...

2--the end should never justify the means. If it does, then there is a problem.

Robbing a bank can be an effective way to get money, do you suggest we do that too?


lrhall41

Submitted by skydivr7673 on Fri, 06/29/2007 - 20:26

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


I think the courts use the "reasonable person" standards when deciding harassment. So if a reasonable person would consider it harassment, the law does too. But what one person considers reasonable, another may not, so it's still very vague . . . . But as skydiver said, if you feel you are being harassed, the best person to contact would be an attorney. They can best advise you on if you have a case. If you go to naca.net you can find an attorney in your area that handles debt collection matters.


lrhall41

Submitted by goudah2424 on Fri, 06/29/2007 - 21:12

( Posts: 7935 | Credits: )


what is with dodging debts while spending money on cell phones, having manicures, weaves, shopping, internet, starbucks, playstations, a cruise here and there, what has America come to?


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 07/30/2007 - 12:22

( Posts: | Credits: )


where did anyone say they were running, or hiding?? What about getting a weave or taking a cruise?? You two mutts really need to get a hobby. Tell me, boys, do I have a weave? No, I am a guy. How many cruises have I been on?? Anyone, anyone? HMMM....So, tell me about manicures...?

The truth of the matter, something that most collectors are apparently allergic to, is that I do not have one single legitimate debt in collections. I dont have any credit cards. I have no personal loans. I have a truck payment which is not in collections, and a mortgage which is also not in collections. And yet, retards like you two still contact me or put crap on my credit report from states I have never even lived in. TEll you what--when you geniuses can actually get YOUR act together and do YOUR job the right way, and follow the law EVERY time, then you will have earned the right to ****and moan about others. Until then, seek life elsewhere. I have experienced ID theft, and jumped through every hoop that has been asked of me, and even then people like you two clowns cant get it right.

oh yeah, running, hiding?? Like using fake names when youre on the phone with people, right? No, I am certain that you two NEVER have done that.....all that hiding you yourselves do must be tiring, huh??

[color=Red]****Adult term removed - Jason[/color]


lrhall41

Submitted by skydivr7673 on Mon, 07/30/2007 - 16:30

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


Have any of you who, who hide from your bills, read the loan agreement you signed to steal the money? Agreeing to accept something and return it equals stealing when not paid or returned as promised. People on these boards should apply maybe half of the energy used on here to find a way to pay their bills. Try working a job for pay vs being online whining. Now if someone is being called who did not borrow anything then they can complain. Unless they are using the number one excuse of someone stole my identity. :lol:


lrhall41

Submitted by on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 15:42

( Posts: | Credits: )


Aha....and our friend "guest" reveals their true identity. A payday lender, or an employee of one.



sounds very familiar to me - like a guest who has been coming around for some time now.

Guest, while we all appreciate a good healthy debate, accusing our membership of being thieves and unemployed deadbeats who spend money on things they can't afford is not conducive to healthy debate. It only alienates you and promotes ridicule.

Have a nice day. :-)


lrhall41

Submitted by SUEBEEHONEY70 on Sat, 08/04/2007 - 05:28

( Posts: 4583 | Credits: )


well help them be codependent and whine amongst the best of you dodgers. Why doesn't someone direct them on how to pay the debt instead of helping them lookup a phone number so they know not to answer it. Shame on you debt dodgers, but it is nice to know you all don't mind making up the difference due to their not paying. Could you all pull together and pay their debts for them so we don't have marked up items, higher rates, etc.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Sun, 08/05/2007 - 17:17

( Posts: | Credits: )


hi, just browsing boards and ran across this one. looks like your guest was telling people that when others fail to pay their debts: The result is higher prices and apr (which is interest rates) to everyone else.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 03/03/2008 - 18:17

( Posts: | Credits: )


I've recently have recieved calls, from a CA, about an oustanding debt, that has been on my credit, for AT LEAST 4 to 5 years now. Now the CA is calling to "collect." Even if a debt is THAT old,can a CA STILL call about it? I never recieved calls, about this debt, until now.


lrhall41

Submitted by sdchargers_63 on Tue, 03/04/2008 - 05:11

( Posts: 1798 | Credits: )


Also getting harrassment phone calls from a number 800-684-8439. When I called they said it was a Resort, however they are received numerous calls of harrassment complaints. It seems someone is making calls from this number, but plead that it is not them. The calls are coming three times a day and it does not stop. Any suggestions?


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 03/19/2008 - 07:40

( Posts: | Credits: )


I am the Assistant General Manager at Ocean Crest Resort in Moclips, WA. Our 800 number is 1-800-684-8439. We get many calls from people complaining about bill collectors calling from this number. This is an incoming 800 line only. We cannot make any calls from our resort on this number. In fact, that 800 number frowards to a local number that our switchboard cannot select to make an outbound call. I have worked with our Long Distance Carrier, Sprint, who supplies the 800 number, our Local Carrier, Centurytel, and the FBI to try to stop whoever is making calls and having our 800 number display on caller ID's. The problem is that it is not illegal, according to the FBI and the Fraud Departments of both telephone companies. We ask that if you get any calls from 1-800-684-8439, please report it to Washington State Attorney General's office. Perhaps they can get somebody to put an end to this. We have tried, but the AG's office will not help businesses. If you, as a consumer, initiate the investigation, perhaps they will do something.

We are very sorry for any inconvenience, please be assured that we have done everything we can.

Sincerely,
Jess Owen
Assistant General Manager
Ocean Crest Resort


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 09/17/2008 - 21:44

( Posts: | Credits: )