logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Universal Savings Bank, Midland Funding and Frederick J Hanna

Date: Fri, 03/26/2010 - 09:17

Submitted by anonymous
on Fri, 03/26/2010 - 09:17

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 7


Hello everyone! I'll try to make this short and to the point. I'm being sued by Frederick J Hanna on behalf of Midland for a debt they claim was originally owed to Universal Savings Bank. Hanna claims to be an assignee of Universal Savings Bank in the court papers. I've never been given ANY kind of validation of debt after I originally requested it over a year ago. It seems now that Universal Savings Bank has been liquidated. What does that mean for me? How can they be an assignee of a company that no longer exists? Universal Savings has been removed from my credit report but Midland is still there. Isn't it a violation for Midland to report unverified information to the credit bureaus? I've answered the lawsuit and request for discovery with a big fat denial. I've also requested my own discovery that I'm fairly confident they cannot supply. I guess my main question is about Universal Savings Bank being liquidated and what it means for my court case.

Please help.
Thanks


Ask the court clerk how to file a countersuit...you would countersue for continued collection activity after a demand for validation...did you ever dispute the midland listing on your credit reports? If so and they verified then that is also continued collection activity....I am betting they represent Midland.

During Discovery ask for all documentation (contract, agreement, statement) and also ask for proof they are acting on behalf of the original creditor as I bet they are only acting on behalf of Midland. Ask for proof that Midland is the holder of the account either a sales slip or whatnot....


lrhall41

Submitted by goldenbast on Tue, 03/30/2010 - 12:05

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )


Thanks, They've also just sent me a form letter offering to settle the debt. Does that count as contact after a validation request has been made? Isn't that a violation as well? I've already sent my discovery and requested everything you said. On the request for discovery they sent me it says they are Midland acting for Universal. Is stating that they represent a company that no longer exists a violation as well? I get the feeling they are crooked as hell and hoping I'll just roll over.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Tue, 03/30/2010 - 13:40

( Posts: | Credits: )


The settlement offer is considered continued collection activity. On your discovery did you ask for proof they are collecting for Universal?

Did they try to pop an affidavit in the case? They very well may, keep an eye out for it and be sure to object to it as hearsay....you want to ask whoever singed it how they could possibly have personal knowledge of this account...were they there when you signed the account? Were they there when you used said account? etc.


lrhall41

Submitted by goldenbast on Wed, 03/31/2010 - 19:43

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )


I got served a summons in Georgia and filed an answer to the Court and had my day in Court yesterday. A lot of people were there making deals, two had attorneys. I stuck to my guns and they dismissed the suit without predjuice. There was another guy there and I coached him what to do and they dismissed his as well. They have pre typed papers of dismissal ready just in case someone like me shows up.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Fri, 03/25/2011 - 16:06

( Posts: | Credits: )