logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

When the cc company calls for the first time

Date: Mon, 07/05/2010 - 10:14

Submitted by kevinbass38
on Mon, 07/05/2010 - 10:14

Posts: 14 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 20


I have stpped payingon my cards. I want to wait 90 or more to negotiate a settlement. What do I tell the cc co. when they call to avoid a lawsuit?


[QUOTE=kevinbass38;719559]I have lost my job and my rates have gone to 29.9 I cannot find work and even if i do it will be just enough to pay rent and food. I[/QUOTE]

sounds to me like you know what to say then :)

but i'd leave off the interest rate part cause they might strong arm you into a lower interest rate and get you to pay if you ever have money


lrhall41

Submitted by blackbeasst on Mon, 07/05/2010 - 15:20

( Posts: 196 | Credits: )


well, what you tell them is the truth...the reason you cannot pay. I do not believe in this strategic default business. It seems very dishonest. I paid mine until the month when I couldnt find a way to pay it all. Then I let it all go tumbling down.

i will differ slightly with bb on this one in that you may not need to settle. perhaps if they gave you a workout plan with a low interest rate it would be good enough for you.

due to the amount of debt I had, none of that would have been any more than a temporary band aid.


lrhall41

Submitted by dantheman on Mon, 07/05/2010 - 18:58

( Posts: 860 | Credits: )


I just spoke to Chase again and they said that in 4 days, my case will be sentto " pre litigation." I have been reading quite a bit in the forums about people going 90, 120, and 160 and up to3 years behind on payments. Why does it seem that my case is going directly to court. I have the money to settle at 30% but they countered my 30% offer with 50% and now it seems it will go to court. Will I then lose my chance to negotiate? How fast will this thing realistically go to court.


lrhall41

Submitted by kevinbass38 on Sun, 08/22/2010 - 17:44

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


"I do not believe in this strategic default business. It seems very dishonest....." I agree with you in part there Dan but I myself have no problem with my current "strategic" default. Yes I have a "hardship" with lack of money but its nothing "they" would condsider a hardship. Truth to tell I think most people with a real hardship like job loss, very bad illness, very sick loved one or what have you probably have little means to even settle at the percentages that you typically seem to see from the major creditors. And probably even less motivation.

The reason I dont see anything personally wrong with it is that when the banks raise your rate despite no late payments or change your interest rate just because "they can" (and yes this is just what BoA told me on the phone) or any manner of detrimental changes to your account despite not being behind its just a "business decision" but when consumers default and just ignore judgments (if they can) or file bankruptcy thats "dishonest".

I can tell you right now that personally I would never even had considered defaulting like I am right now or declaring BK like I will if things dont work out like I want in the end if they hadnt unilaterally *&%$ me despite over 20 years of perfect credit behavior.


lrhall41

Submitted by rown on Mon, 08/23/2010 - 09:07

( Posts: 70 | Credits: )


"Why does it seem that my case is going directly to court...."

It most likely isnt. While no one really knows the triggers for creditors to sue its apperently very VERY rare for them to even entertain the thought prior to chargeoff unless you have some very very recent balance transfers or cash advances.

What is NOT rare though is for them to try and frighten you and most people get nervous at the word "litigation". Unless you have some nice non exempt assets they can see on your credit report or public data base search on you they are most likely just blowing smoke.

They are using it for leverage "if you dont take our 50% offer we MIGHT sue. Also notice they said "pre litigation". Anyone know what that is? I dont. I THINK I know what it MIGHT be according to the context but notice they didnt say "we will sue you in 30 days".

could they sue you? Yes. Will they sue you? I have no idea nor does anyone else. But the odds are against it at this early stage Id say.


lrhall41

Submitted by rown on Mon, 08/23/2010 - 09:13

( Posts: 70 | Credits: )


Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinbass38
I just spoke to Chase again and they said that in 4 days, my case will be sentto " pre litigation." I have been reading quite a bit in the forums about people going 90, 120, and 160 and up to3 years behind on payments. Why does it seem that my case is going directly to court. I have the money to settle at 30% but they countered my 30% offer with 50% and now it seems it will go to court. Will I then lose my chance to negotiate? How fast will this thing realistically go to court.


Maybe someone else can answer this but does Prelitigation dept mean they are to court? It sounds like it is just another dept within Chase.


Cookycris-at 90 days FIA wasn't offering settlements to me either but they did later. At 90 days they are still hoping you can figure something out.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jill Adams on Mon, 08/23/2010 - 09:46

( Posts: 96 | Credits: )


Quote:

Originally Posted by cookycris
jill- i know you probably posted it somewhere on here before but how many days were you when fia settled with you? thanks for your help


I was bad at taking notes, I don't recommend that :) But I remember they first offered us 40 or 50% and we were past 90 days I would say closer to 120. We declined but didn't counter because we didn't have the funds. Then I would say around 150 days or so they either offered 30% or my husband offered 25% and they countered at 30%. I can't remember which way. We declined because we didn't have the funds. At the end of the month after 180 days they charged off. It went to recovery and we tried to get our 30% offer back as we were going to take funds out of retirement but they said we were too late. They offered something I don't remember what but it was more than 30%. It ended up going to collections where we settled at 40% one lump sum.

I really think they will come down for you. I just think it will be slim that they do it before 120 days or maybe even more.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jill Adams on Mon, 08/23/2010 - 14:12

( Posts: 96 | Credits: )


Greetings to all,

Just a couple of thought to share.....

1. The ccc's don't give a damn about your interest rate going from 9.9% to 29.9%.

2. If you are going through a job loss or whatever, your first responsibility is survival.
Senor Ramsey says it best; food, shelter, utilities and transportation.

3. If you know the brick wall is coming up fast, then you've got to take action before you hit it. I have no problem with a preemptive strike while you have a few assets left (cash).

4. For what it's worth, Chase-me down/run over me along with BOA-the snake should be the easiest to settle with.

5. Chase will settle from 60 days on and the snake from about 100 days on.

6. Pre-litigation sounds like a bluff to me. We are all in pre-death you know!

Was you balance a result of a cash advance or balance transfer?

Repectfully yours,
King " Kash" Jabba Labba


lrhall41

Submitted by King Jabba Labba on Mon, 08/23/2010 - 19:50

( Posts: 507 | Credits: )