logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Debt collector saying they will sue

Date: Thu, 08/19/2010 - 12:30

Submitted by anonymous
on Thu, 08/19/2010 - 12:30

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 10


I was just told by a debt collection company that i was going to be sued for not paying on a overdue medical bill due to the fact that I have no income. They gave me no information on when they will serve me (or if they will) and i had only heard from them one time in the past 3 months since it went to collections. What can I do to prepare myself/get anything ready? The company is Premier Credit in Chattanooga TN


If they are collecting medical, I would guess they are licensed and will follow thru. It can be tough to get good medical accounts.

Since this is a small claims case and a "small" amount, it does not make sense to get an atty. Just go in and state the facts, they should allow for a small payment plan.


lrhall41

Submitted by PDLOwner on Fri, 08/20/2010 - 06:36

( Posts: 1049 | Credits: )


well, let me ask this--who owns this debt?

If the CA owns the debt, then they can tell you that youre going to be sued. If they are hired by the medical provider and they dont own the debt, they cannot tell you "you will be sued" because that isnt their decision to make. You said the debt has been in collections for 3 months, this leads me to believe that the CA doesnt actually own the debt. An easy way to tell is who they are telling you to send payment to. If they dont own the debt, they will usually tell you to make the check payable to their client. This isnt foolproof but it can provide a good indication.

EDIT--also, you need to check to see if they are licensed. Dont believe that they are because they are collecting medical debt. I recently had a debt collector try to collect on a bogus medical bill, and they are located in my state.....and they arent even licensed in the state.


lrhall41

Submitted by skydivr7673 on Sat, 08/21/2010 - 04:29

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


Technically, it is all in the wording. So many collectors spout off, "I will sue you" or "we will sue you". Well CA's cant sue...it would have to be sent to a law firm to be litigated. Also so many will say this even though there is no intent or CA not routinely refer accounts out for judgements. Those are violations too.


lrhall41

Submitted by SOAPLADY on Sat, 08/21/2010 - 05:01

( Posts: 17315 | Credits: )


Also look into their enforcement options in your state. If you are unemployed there is no income (at least for now) for them to garnish. How is your asset situation vs your states exemptions. Check out the "worst case" scenario. If you cant pay it whatever you do DONT agree to pay it. It just makes things worse for you in the short term.

Its entirely possible that at least for the interim they will have no means to collect. Dont get the idea that just because a judge tells you you have to pay them you HAVE to pay them. Short of a garnishment or bank levy the judge has no means (and usually not the inclination) to try and pry money from you for the benefit of the plaintiff.

Once you get a job again be ready for them to swoop back in and try and garnish their little (nonexistent) hearts out.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Sat, 08/21/2010 - 08:53

( Posts: | Credits: )