Sufficient validation?
Date: Wed, 03/21/2012 - 12:36
In the letter I sent I requested that they provide me with:
- What the money you say I owe is for;
- Explain and show me how you calculated what you say I owe;
- Provide me with copies of any papers that show I agreed to pay what you say I owe;
- Provide a verification or copy of any judgment if applicable;
- Identify the original creditor;
- Prove the Statute of Limitations has not expired on this account;
- Show me that you are licensed to collect in my state; and
- Provide me with your license numbers and Registered Agent.
In my estimation, they did not validate this debt, only verified it. Am I right? Do I send another letter highlighting the information they failed to provide that I have a right to? I'm not sure how to proceed. Any help is appreciated.
I know some of the experts on this board will disagree with me,
I know some of the experts on this board will disagree with me, but there is no difference between "Validation" and "Verification". certain sites and crappy form validation requests suggest otherwise, but the FDCPA itself uses the term interchangeably (809.B).
that said, the threshold of validtion is pretty ambiguous and it looks as though your account has been properly validated. heck, even verified! the requests you made are not expressly required by the FDCPA. as far as the balance difference, its possible that they didnt send you the charge off statement.
You are not entitled to half the stuff in that ,letter....it is
You are not entitled to half the stuff in that ,letter....it is a copy of a crappy letter on this site and floating around the internet.
Read this thread on how to write a proper DV letter.
http://www.debtconsolidationcare.com/forums/showthread.php?t=152020
my take
i agree with username as you received statements belonging to the original creditor.that's validation.now however there is a difference between validation and verification.i could write up a statement in my own writing attesting that the debt is owed and it would be verified.basically though the OP'S assertion that this was not validated is incorrect as those statements are validation.i would contact the attorney and start negotiating.