Tape recording conversations
Date: Thu, 02/16/2006 - 07:26
Submitted by Not so Lucky
on
Thu, 02/16/2006 - 07:26
Total Replies: 11
Majority of US states allow recording conversation with one part
Majority of US states allow recording conversation with one party consent. How many persons are involved in the conversation does not matter here. Any of them can start recording without informing others.
However if you are from any of these 12 states, then you should inform the other participants that you are going to record the conversation. If they still continue speaking that means they do not have any problem with it. But those who are not willing to get their voice recorded, can stop the conversation or disconnect it. Check if you belong to these states-
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Massachusetts
Maryland
Michigan
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
Pennsylvania and
Washington.
Citizens of these states will be breaking law if they try to record any conversation without the consent of all the participants. Brat, if you find any such activities, consult a lawyer to inquire how can you fight it legally.
different laws different states
In California the law states that a beep every few seconds is enough to imply recording is in progress but in some states they must notify you by either a recorded message or voice prompt .... Yes you can refuse to be recorded at anytime
click the link to check your state laws
http://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording-guide
Good addition Piptay :D I think if you belong to the state th
Good addition Piptay :D
I think if you belong to the state that permits recording with one party consent, you can still deny to be recorded, but you cannot bring any legal action, right?
Does anyone know the law in Ontario regarding taped conversation
Does anyone know the law in Ontario regarding taped conversations or where I can get information on it?
Thanks!
Hi Guest, The only thing I have read about Canada is, "Can
Hi Guest,
The only thing I have read about Canada is,
"Canadian federal law requires one-party consent for telephone call recording. Please refer to provincial laws for more information."
I am still looking for more information on the provincial laws, I'll let you know here if I find anything.
~Mary
interstate calls: which law applies?
Which law applies if someone places a call from a one-party state to a two-party state?
Also, when a phone number doesn't accurately reflect the location of a caller or callee, can I assume the physical location of the person is what matters? (I'm thinking of cell phones, those number-disguising operations some telemarketers use, call forwarding, etc.)
If you state that you are going to record the conversation, no r
If you state that you are going to record the conversation, no room is left for confusion, right?
Presumably not, I'm not recording the conversation, so that does
Presumably not, I'm not recording the conversation, so that doesn't help me.
If call is placed from a one-party state to a two-party state, which state law applies to whether the conversation can be recorded without the knowledge and consent of both parties?
And does the physical location of the party determine which law applies? Neither party necessarily knows the physical location of the other, only -- at most -- the phone number displayed by Caller ID or the number the call was placed to.
Does anybody know?
The laws will be applicable of the state where the consumer is r
The laws will be applicable of the state where the consumer is residing. The collection agencies follow the licensing rules of the state where the consumer is in.
From what I have read it can be a little grey when crossing stat
From what I have read it can be a little grey when crossing state lines on wether the state law applies or federal law at this point.
Federal law is only one party must be aware of the taping.
I read a couple of cases off of the link I provided in the other posts where the Federal law did prevail but these were mainly dealing with journalist.
Tim